NewsBot
New Member
- Messages
- 111,281
- Reaction score
- 2,947
Free agency will bring about some changes, but when it comes to the Cowboys, has the front office put enough clues in place to spoil the surprise?
One of the great things about having a front office that is disciplined enough to stick to their plan is that after a while – you can start see the method to their madness. By now, many are privy to the idea that the Cowboys don’t spend a lot of money in free agency. They have a simple formula – plug holes in free agency, but build the team through the draft. It’s a really good formula that appears to be working. Using free agency to fill gaps allow you to draft as pure as possible rather than forcing a selection based on need. The Cowboys try to attend to as many of their basic needs as they can during the free agency period so they are free to pluck off the best talent from the tree that is the NFL Draft. And it’s been a plentiful tree full of delicious treats, but before we get to all that goodness, let’s try to dial in what the Cowboys will do in March when free agency hits.
As I like to do from time to time before I put on my fortune teller hat, let’s have a looksy at the Cowboys free agent movement over the last two seasons and see if there is anything we can learn from it.
2015
Starting from most urgent to less critical, here are the snap counts that the team would need to replenish from the 2014 season.
Wide Receiver (1487)
It may have not felt like it, but the Cowboys had some gaping holes at the wide receiver position entering the 2015 season. The contracts of Dez Bryant, Cole Beasley, and Dwayne Harris had all expired. Most people fully expected the team to bring back Bryant and Beasley, and sure enough – they did. All that was really left was replacing Harris’ snaps who signed with the New York Giants. While he didn’t log many reps on offense, he was a significant contributor on special teams. Dallas would find his replacement by signing undrafted free-agent, Lucky Whitehead.
***Large snip***
Continue reading...
Last edited by a moderator: