BTB: NFL 2011 Combine: Cowboys Draft Strategy Taking Shape?

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,028
Reaction score
25,008
NFL 2011 Combine: Cowboys Draft Strategy Taking Shape?
by rabblerousr on Feb 25, 2011 2:53 PM CST in Dallas Cowboys 2011 Draft


http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2011...-combine-dallas-cowboys-tyron-smith#storyjump

Tyron Smith's Combine weigh-in should make the Dallas Brass breathe a little more easily.


To my mind, a couple of pieces of news have emerged in the past week that served, at first, to muddle, and then to clarify, Dallas' draft strategy. The first of these is the contention, uttered by several scouting types, that there will be a significant run on offensive linemen in the first round. Indeed, Wes Bunting's most recent mock draft has seven big uglies going in round one; Pro Football Weekly's mock has tabbed eight first round O-linemen. As a result, players such as Villanova's Ben Ijilana, Danny Watkins of Baylor and Florida's Mike Pouncey, who once stood a good chance of being on the board when the Cowboys picked at # 40, now seem as if they will already be on charter flights to their new team's training facilities by the time the Dallas is on the clock.

The problem here is that the top offensive line candidates are currently being slotting neatly between picks 15 and 33 (PFW has the first OL snapped up at 13; Bunting has Tyron Smith going at 10, but the next OL doesn't come off the board until pick 19). In other words, all the top players at Dallas' most alarming position of need aren't grading out high enough to justify picking with their first pick but aren't likely to be available at their second. For a team that simply must draft a quality offensive lineman--preferably in the first couple of rounds--this is an unwelcome development.

Many draftniks have suggested that Jerry Jones should try to trade down, into the realm where the dancing elephants are likely to be picked. This, of course, is based on a couple of assumptions: that a willing trade partner is available, and that they wouldn't be turning their backs on a blue-chip player (or players) at #9 just to get an O-lineman. Three weeks ago, I was sure that the optimal strategy would be to go for one of the blue chip defensive lineman (or, if by some miracle he was available, LSU's Patrick Peterson) at #9, and try to get the best available OL at the top of the second round. Now, because so many of those top-of-the-second-round OL types have risen, this strategy seems less tenable.

But, so does trading away a chance at a top-tier player. What to do?...
 
This draft is deep in DL not as much in OL especially in the top end.

I would definitely trade down some to pick up an extra 3rd and pick OT in the 1st round. DL in the 2nd round. CB/OL in the 3rd round.

this will shore up potentially 3-4 spots in our roster and possibly have 2-3 starters and 3-4 contributors immediately.
 
So this is saying Tyron will go 10, but Dallas will reach bigtime with 9? lol
 
LatinMind;3858006 said:
So this is saying Tyron will go 10, but Dallas will reach bigtime with 9? lol

We need to trade down to 10 to get this guy...:laugh2:
 
The draft this year will be a little different in that in the past the team with the first pick was allowed to negotiate a contract with their pick before the draft but this year with the CBA unsettled and a possible rookie wage scale, will that still be the case? If not, could it affect who Carolina picks?

Could there be any ripple effect?
 
It could work both ways at present, Bob. Without a new contract, things would proceed as last season. With a new contract, their just might be a cap on drafted players as well. That could open up movement due to less signing stigma to deal with also.
 
btcutter;3858001 said:
This draft is deep in DL not as much in OL especially in the top end.

I would definitely trade down some to pick up an extra 3rd and pick OT in the 1st round. DL in the 2nd round. CB/OL in the 3rd round.

this will shore up potentially 3-4 spots in our roster and possibly have 2-3 starters and 3-4 contributors immediately.

No, I'm tired of the trade down crap...all for "potential" players......ONLY trade down if a few places, no more than 12 to 15 ranges. And I don't even like that far. I would rather have one sure fire player than 3 or 4 potential players.

Unless we can get another 1st round, this year or next. Then I will be ok with it.
 
jazzcat22;3858232 said:
No, I'm tired of the trade down crap...all for "potential" players......ONLY trade down if a few places, no more than 12 to 15 ranges. And I don't even like that far. I would rather have one sure fire player than 3 or 4 potential players.

Unless we can get another 1st round, this year or next. Then I will be ok with it.

it all depends..you dont trade down just for the heck of it..and you dont just stand pat just for the heck of it
 
I tend to agree w/ jazzcat22. It is always nice to get extra picks, IF you still get someone who can play!.. This guy isn't another Jacob Rodgers is he???...
 
CalCBFan;3858312 said:
I tend to agree w/ jazzcat22. It is always nice to get extra picks, IF you still get someone who can play!.. This guy isn't another Jacob Rodgers is he???...
People need to review their History before asking these kinds of questions. USC has produced far more good to great NFL OTs than they have produced bums.

In fact, 3 former USC Tackles are in the Hall of Fame and I won't be shocked if Tony Boselli doesn't end up as #4 in the near future.
 
Give me Patrick Peterson, Cam Jordan, or Tyron Smith in the 1st and im happy
 
TheDallasDon;3858368 said:
Give me Patrick Peterson, Cam Jordan, or Tyron Smith in the 1st and im happy

That's a pretty good list alright...:)
 
Hostile;3858356 said:
People need to review their History before asking these kinds of questions. USC has produced far more good to great NFL OTs than they have produced bums.

In fact, 3 former USC Tackles are in the Hall of Fame and I won't be shocked if Tony Boselli doesn't end up as #4 in the near future.

Nice post, Hos...I even have flashback regrets of a series of misshot offensive line picks by Bill Parcells as well.
 
TheDallasDon;3858377 said:
Forgot ill take Robert Quinn also

For that one, you'll have to wrestle with Rob Ryan about Anothy Spencer's role.
 
CCBoy;3858379 said:
For that one, you'll have to wrestle with Rob Ryan about Anothy Spencer's role.

Hahaha, on a serious note im sure Ryan could draw up some stuff to use all three guys Ware, Spencer, and Quinn and mabey some plays where they are all own the field at the same time
 
That was the hardest I laughed in a long time; thanks! That was absolutely hysterical (we need to trade down to 10 to get this guy) . . .too funny!!!!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,691
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top