BTB:Taking Any Supplements?

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,435
Reaction score
757
by KD Drummond on Jun 17, 2011 3:00 PM CDT in Dallas Cowboys General

58457_Ohio_St_Tressel_Reaction_Football.jpg

Could Ohio State tackle Mike Adams be a back up plan for the Cowboys if things go wrong with the Doug Free situation?
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2011/6/17/2225319/taking-any-supplements

Without the opportunity to tangibly discuss free agent targets, Cowboys fans have probably analyzed the 2011 draft picks to the point of knowing everything from shoe sizes to nervous ticks. Labor talks are progressing, but no one should feel confident that a deal will be in place until a deal is actually put in place. There are plenty of perceived roster holes however, as well as room for depth chart improvement within the Cowboys wheelhouse. One way to address some of those concerns would be to select a player or two in the supplemental draft. Word is that despite the lockout, the supplement draft will take place sometime next month, according to ESPN's Adam Scheffter. With Jim Tressel recently resigning from pro football factory Ohio State University, the pool of potential supplemental draft eligible players grew. Are there any supplements the Cowboys, and more specifically Jason Garrett, would be interested in taking?

The supplemental draft has been around since 1977. It allows entry from players who either didn't meet the filing deadline for the actual draft, or have lost their eligibility since the deadline. Draft order is determined by a weighted system that divides the 32 teams into three groups; teams with six or less wins, other non-playoff teams, and teams that made the tourney. There is a lottery for each group that determines the internal pecking order, so Dallas could conceivably make a claim ahead of the Panthers for instance. Teams submit bids to the Commissioner with the round they would pick that player. If no other team places a bid on that player at an earlier spot, the team is awarded the player and has to give up an equivalent pick in the following year's draft.
 
cowboyjoe;3975301 said:
Could Ohio State tackle Mike Adams be a back up plan for the Cowboys if things go wrong with the Doug Free situation?
If someone decides to swipe Free from us, I wouldn't really consider that "going wrong." We might be scrambling for a tackle this year, but we'd gain a 1st and 3rd next year.

I don't think anyone will do that though.
 
peplaw06;3975331 said:
If someone decides to swipe Free from us, I wouldn't really consider that "going wrong." We might be scrambling for a tackle this year, but we'd gain a 1st and 3rd next year.

I don't think anyone will do that though.


not if the new cba reverts to 4 year free agency rules, he'll walk for nothing
 
Wow, thought that was Brewster for a minute.... maybe longer...
 
ukinto8;3975352 said:
not if the new cba reverts to 4 year free agency rules, he'll walk for nothing

If the new CBA reverts to the old rules, they will also add a new tag period to protect the teams assuming the old rules.
 
Draft scout has him listed as the 29th best prospect in the 2012 draft and the second best OT, as a projected 2nd rounder FWIW. I don think much of this list. They have Chris Galippo of USC rated as the 27th best prospect and I dont think he can play at all.
 
Trading Doug Free because we have Tyron Smith would be stupider IMO than trading Miles Austin because we have Dez Bryant.


Why? because Miles is a WR, and Doug is a proven top-10 LT in the league right now, I've seen a few people rank him around 7, 8. If Tyron hits his potential he will be better than that, but he may also bust. Makes no sense to me, but once again I didn't understand the few mentals who called for trading Miles' last year because Dez has slightly more potentially than him.
 
Romo 2 Austin;3975437 said:
Trading Doug Free because we have Tyron Smith would be stupider IMO than trading Miles Austin because we have Dez Bryant.


Why? because Miles is a WR, and Doug is a proven top-10 LT in the league right now, I've seen a few people rank him around 7, 8. If Tyron hits his potential he will be better than that, but he may also bust. Makes no sense to me, but once again I didn't understand the few mentals who called for trading Miles' last year because Dez has slightly more potentially than him.

It's stupider than using the word stupider.
 
Romo 2 Austin;3975437 said:
Trading Doug Free because we have Tyron Smith would be stupider IMO than trading Miles Austin because we have Dez Bryant.


Why? because Miles is a WR, and Doug is a proven top-10 LT in the league right now, I've seen a few people rank him around 7, 8. If Tyron hits his potential he will be better than that, but he may also bust. Makes no sense to me, but once again I didn't understand the few mentals who called for trading Miles' last year because Dez has slightly more potentially than him.

Can you please have at least one comment without throwing Miles Austin's name in it? Everybody on here knows your opinion about him, you dont need to continue to say the same thing on every thread
 
Romo2Dez88;3975518 said:
Can you please have at least one comment without throwing Miles Austin's name in it? Everybody on here knows your opinion about him, you dont need to continue to say the same thing on every thread

Obvious answer of no is obvious.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,678
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top