Wasn't luke the 3rd stringer for the Commanders back in the day of the Ole Ball Coach
Kangaroo Active Member Messages 9,893 Reaction score 1 Dec 2, 2007 #21 Wasn't luke the 3rd stringer for the Commanders back in the day of the Ole Ball Coach
thekavorka Well-Known Member Messages 1,787 Reaction score 34 Dec 2, 2007 #22 now THIS is a play fake. completely fooled the defense (and me). http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d804bbd0c about 42 seconds into the video (beginning of the 2nd quarter)
now THIS is a play fake. completely fooled the defense (and me). http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d804bbd0c about 42 seconds into the video (beginning of the 2nd quarter)
windward NFL Historian Messages 18,740 Reaction score 4,579 Dec 3, 2007 #23 Bob Sacamano;1807280 said: he's been very good these past 2 years wierd Click to expand... It's unfortunate Galloway never got to play with Romo. Imagine what he could have done then. NFC Pro Bowl receivers IMO TO Driver Galloway Fitzgerald
Bob Sacamano;1807280 said: he's been very good these past 2 years wierd Click to expand... It's unfortunate Galloway never got to play with Romo. Imagine what he could have done then. NFC Pro Bowl receivers IMO TO Driver Galloway Fitzgerald
joseephuss Well-Known Member Messages 28,041 Reaction score 6,920 Dec 3, 2007 #24 burmafrd;1807298 said: He would not have done it for us. Click to expand... Why is that? I think he would have fit well in Garrett's offense.
burmafrd;1807298 said: He would not have done it for us. Click to expand... Why is that? I think he would have fit well in Garrett's offense.