hra8700
Active Member
- Messages
- 841
- Reaction score
- 119
If one kicker is 10/10 is he necessarilly better than a kicker that's 5/10?
Not if the first kicker kicked 10 20 yard field goals and the second kicker kicked 10 50 yard field goals.
Distance matters.
Based on this graph that shows average field goal percentage of every kicker in the league for the last 10 years:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3597/3689279396_ab3d5f712a_o.png
I calculated based on the distance of every one of his kicks this year that he should have made slightly over 24 of his 31 field goals. He made 24.
Thus, if you account for the DISTANCE he was asked to kick, he is an average kicker.
No need to replace him.
Not if the first kicker kicked 10 20 yard field goals and the second kicker kicked 10 50 yard field goals.
Distance matters.
Based on this graph that shows average field goal percentage of every kicker in the league for the last 10 years:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3597/3689279396_ab3d5f712a_o.png
I calculated based on the distance of every one of his kicks this year that he should have made slightly over 24 of his 31 field goals. He made 24.
Thus, if you account for the DISTANCE he was asked to kick, he is an average kicker.
No need to replace him.
