percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
Here's how last year's play selection broke down, on passes thrown 1-20 yards. This is air yardage, or how far the ball travels before the catch.
2006 (Romo)
Passes Thrown 1-10 Yards: 164 attempts (72%)
Passes Thrown 11-20 Yards: 64 attempts (28%)
Of the 229 passes thrown 1-20 yards, 164 (or 72%) were of the shorter variety (1-10). This isn't as one-sided as it seems when you consider that the longer routes gain more yardage. It was actually pretty good balance. Now fast forward to 2007.
2007 (thru 4 games)
Passes Thrown 1-10 Yards: 33 attempts (50%)
Passes Thrown 11-20 Yards: 33 attempts (50%)
Huge change in philosophy with the new OC. At first glance, it seems like good balance, but it isn't really, because it gives defenses little reason to worry about the shorter routes. The Bills' staff planned their defensive approach to last night's game basing it on these numbers. We played right into their hands, until we adjusted on the last two drives. In this way, the Bills did us a favor.
In our RB's, we have receiving weapons which we have seldom used the past two seasons. We may even have a decent pass-catching FB in Anderson. We can incorporate more of the shorter routes with the wideouts that worked so well last year, and it will open up the longer stuff. The yards are still there, whether they come in chunks or small bites.
We're lucky this change in the way teams were defending our passing game happened last night, and not next week vs. NE.
2006 (Romo)
Passes Thrown 1-10 Yards: 164 attempts (72%)
Passes Thrown 11-20 Yards: 64 attempts (28%)
Of the 229 passes thrown 1-20 yards, 164 (or 72%) were of the shorter variety (1-10). This isn't as one-sided as it seems when you consider that the longer routes gain more yardage. It was actually pretty good balance. Now fast forward to 2007.
2007 (thru 4 games)
Passes Thrown 1-10 Yards: 33 attempts (50%)
Passes Thrown 11-20 Yards: 33 attempts (50%)
Huge change in philosophy with the new OC. At first glance, it seems like good balance, but it isn't really, because it gives defenses little reason to worry about the shorter routes. The Bills' staff planned their defensive approach to last night's game basing it on these numbers. We played right into their hands, until we adjusted on the last two drives. In this way, the Bills did us a favor.
In our RB's, we have receiving weapons which we have seldom used the past two seasons. We may even have a decent pass-catching FB in Anderson. We can incorporate more of the shorter routes with the wideouts that worked so well last year, and it will open up the longer stuff. The yards are still there, whether they come in chunks or small bites.
We're lucky this change in the way teams were defending our passing game happened last night, and not next week vs. NE.