Byrd/Newsome>Street?

[pacboyX]

What do you guys think? I can see us having 4 rb, but a wr may suffer..

 

[Vanilla2]

Nope

 

[Vanilla2]

There's a reason these guys are playing now while street was in there earlier

 

[lane]

byrd looked like dez on that td..

 

[Irvin88_4life]

Street made a great catch against the ones earlier in the game. Street is better then Newsome and Byrd and its not even close

 

[speedkilz88]

Street has a chance to develop into a Terrence Williams type #2. I just can't see either of the other guys ever being more than a 4th option unless those other guys left in free agency. You have to remember that Byrd and Newsome have been in the league for a couple years already.

 

[8FOR!3]

Nah Street is the real deal, but LaRon Byrd does seem like he's legit.

 

[perrykemp]

I don't see them carrying 6 WRs -- there are just too many other areas of weaknesses -- basically all of them on the defense side of the ball. The team is going to have to make up for quality with quantity on defense which is why they will go with 5 WRs and just 3 RBs.

 

[TwoCentPlain]

I don't see them carrying 6 WRs -- there are just too many other areas of weaknesses -- basically all of them on the defense side of the ball. The team is going to have to make up for quality with quantity on defense which is why they will go with 5 WRs and just 3 RBs.

What exactly is the point of carrying a player on defense if he can't even play worth a lick?

 

[jobberone]

RB-Murray and Dunbar get dinged a bit often although RBs are going to get dinged by and large. Contrast that need to maybe carry 4 RBs with the need to carry more defensive players. And you don't keep non-NFL talent over NFL talent in general. Sometimes you get stuck.

WR-more valuable than a RB and you need four guys who can play. I think Byrd and Newsome have the size you like and can play in this league. Dez, Williams, Beasley, Street, Harris. You take Byrd or Newsome for the 53 and try to get the other to the PS.

 

[Richmond Cowboy]

I don't see them carrying 6 WRs -- there are just too many other areas of weaknesses -- basically all of them on the defense side of the ball. The team is going to have to make up for quality with quantity on defense which is why they will go with 5 WRs and just 3 RBs.

Your avatar looks like a perineum.

 

[perrykemp]

Your avatar looks like a perineum.

Looked up 'perineum' on Wikipedia and was horrified with the diagams.

Vaguely remembered the word from one of my kid's childbirths and now I remember why.

 

[pacboyX]

RB-Murray and Dunbar get dinged a bit often although RBs are going to get dinged by and large. Contrast that need to maybe carry 4 RBs with the need to carry more defensive players. And you don't keep non-NFL talent over NFL talent in general. Sometimes you get stuck.

WR-more valuable than a RB and you need four guys who can play. I think Byrd and Newsome have the size you like and can play in this league. Dez, Williams, Beasley, Street, Harris. You take Byrd or Newsome for the 53 and try to get the other to the PS.

I could see Newsome making the PS, but Byrd has shown too much. I know he has been in the league 2/3 years but he is still young.

 

[Craig]

Street is their third best WR from what i can tell. He looks against 1s as the others do against 2s and 3s.

 

[DFWJC]

What do you guys think? I can see us having 4 rb, but a wr may suffer..

They're keeping Street for sure.
You have to factor In that he's a rookie in his 1st preseason. He's done really well.

 

[SportsGuru80]

I would keep Byrd