rkell87;3308563 said:wait, wait, wait. your 16 so you really didn't see aikman play and most likely didn't watch too much football to see elway play and i know you didn't see bradshaw play and now you tell us that you have seen manning play what? like 4 times? how can we take your opinion on any of these players?
Romo 2 Austin;3308739 said:If people want to always use this argument I will use it here. When has he not had a #1 WR? When has he not had a dominent O-Line? He had a great run game for years, and always an above average D.
Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark current
Harrision and Wayne for years.
Romo 2 Austin;3308088 said:3 rings > 1 ring. Aikman > Manning
Nightshade;3308853 said:I would have argued that Manning was one of the best. But I believe that ones performance in the biggest game matters. He played poorly in his second attempt at getting a ring. Elway and Montana obviously better choice.
BraveHeartFan;3309025 said:I can certainly understand that but how can you knock Manning for his poor play in his 2nd Superbowl appearance, after he's helped his team win won, but then say Elway is a better choice and completely disregard his 3 poor Superbowl performances prior him helping his team win 2 at the end?
If by mark you mean people able to appreciate that they have the privilege of watching the entire career of one of the greatest players in the history of the game, then yeah, I guess so.Romo 2 Austin;3309100 said:he can because everyone on this forum is a Manning mark.
I can't knock anybody for saying Elway is the best, QB, player, 1st pick, whatever. Until the last few years, I thought Elway was the best QB I'd ever seen, and right there with a few others as the best player of all time.BraveHeartFan;3309025 said:I can certainly understand that but how can you knock Manning for his poor play in his 2nd Superbowl appearance, after he's helped his team win won, but then say Elway is a better choice and completely disregard his 3 poor Superbowl performances prior him helping his team win 2 at the end?
??? There's only been one guy saying Aikman is better.Z mann R2;3309140 said:LOL @ the Aikman homers in here.....I LIVE for the Cowboys. Will ALWAYS love them even through the worst. And I LOVE Aikman. But Peyton Manning is IMO the greatest QB we've all seen....
Top 3 QB's all time:
Manning
Montana
Elway
in that order
Z mann R2;3309140 said:LOL @ the Aikman homers in here.....I LIVE for the Cowboys. Will ALWAYS love them even through the worst. And I LOVE Aikman. But Peyton Manning is IMO the greatest QB we've all seen....
Top 3 QB's all time:
Manning
Montana
Elway
in that order
Romo 2 Austin;3309143 said:Manning is not better than Staubach, Montana, Graham or Elway. and i'd list another 5 but i'd get **** on even more.
masomenos85;3309159 said:Just out of curiosity, what makes Otto Graham better than Peyton Manning?
By your logic Dilfer was better than Romo. He won more in the postseason and he has a SB ring.Romo 2 Austin;3309161 said:10 championship appearances in 10 seasons makes him the greatest of all time in my book and no I have never seen him play, QBs get judged by winning, he won. Alot.
Peyton on the other hand is 9-9 in the postseason, and has one superbowl ring but is hailed like he is a savior. He is all that, but he isn't all that with a bag of chips. that bag of chips being alot of post-season success. The above QB's had that(incl; Aikman and Bradshaw) they were all that and a bag of chips, Manning is just all that.
Cover 2;3309163 said:By your logic Dilfer was better than Romo. He won more in the postseason and he has a SB ring.
Romo 2 Austin;3309161 said:10 championship appearances in 10 seasons makes him the greatest of all time in my book and no I have never seen him play, QBs get judged by winning, he won. Alot.
Peyton on the other hand is 9-9 in the postseason, and has one superbowl ring but is hailed like he is a savior. He is all that, but he isn't all that with a bag of chips. that bag of chips being alot of post-season success. The above QB's had that(incl; Aikman and Bradshaw) they were all that and a bag of chips, Manning is just all that.
and you realize romo plays like farve right? there is so much i wanna say but i just don't have time.Romo 2 Austin;3309172 said:/sigh/ Romo will win 3 SB's before he hangs 'em up. I bet you it. Romo is the QB that impresses me the most, if I could fully emulate anyones style it would be his, his ability to extend a play when needed most is insanely impressive. Romo is the funnest QB to watch, not a guy who looks like herman munster who doesn't have any more mobility than a 78 year old woman.
Now to clarify for the people who take every word I say and quote it and say im ********; Im not saying Romo is better than Peyton Manning. Im saying he is more impressive, TO ME. I would rather play like Romo than Manning, Romo can do everything you ask a QB to do. Manning can throw accurately.
He can throw accurately, he can extend plays, he can do anything you ask a QB extremely well. Favre is a top 10 QB of all time. He is overrated though since some people say he is a top 3-5.rkell87;3309196 said:and you realize romo plays like farve right? there is so much i wanna say but i just don't have time.
ill say this...your right...manning can throw accurately, but thats about the only thing right in your argument. yes romo is exciting to watch but if that is what makes you think makes a good QB then you don't have an appreciation for the position.
Romo 2 Austin;3308526 said:No I just get furious when I turn on the TV and every 4/10 commercials involves the same person, for Billy Mays it was hilarious for Peyton Mannings its like go away.