No….for startersRunning, not passing.
right i guess you missed his first 6 season developing the dude basically was HiIl over with the saints traded from TB to sf and then developed by one of the best qb coaches ever..took him until his 7th year to even get significant snaps and was 5-5 , his 8th year his first full years as 16 game starter the 9ers were great 14-2 , he played well but daks rookie year was better statistically than that as well as 13-3 and he was ROY. seriously the dak troll hate and the selective memory of some of you border on the insane.. daks every bit as good as young ever was and he wasn't on that 9er team.Steve Young was a freaking stud. I love Dak but he’s not in his league.
That's a very good comparison. McNair was probably a better passer, and runner but good comparison. I think Dak is sharperI will say taking away Dak running the ball takes a lot of his game. He’s no burner but he’s effective when he does. Having him as a drop back passer is ridiculous. He reminds me so much of Air McNair and that’s his game.
right i guess you missed his first 6 season developing the dude basically was HiIl over with the saints traded from TB to sf and then developed by one of the best qb coaches ever..took him until his 7th year to even get significant snaps and was 5-5 , his 8th year his first full years as 16 game starter the 9ers were great 14-2 , he played well but daks rookie year was better statistically than that as well as 13-3 and he was ROY. seriously the dak troll hate and the selective memory of some of you border on the insane.. daks every bit as good as young ever was and he wasn't on that 9er team.
.studd maybe at the end but Daks first 6 years and Youngs first 7, no comparison.
Not even worthy of a convo.
Why? We entertain your gay *** nose tackle post every year.Not even worthy of a convo.
Soooo, how long does Dak sit if he has a Joe Montana in his prime playing in front of him. Honestly, Blue, your post was simply dishonest.right i guess you missed his first 6 season developing the dude basically was HiIl over with the saints traded from TB to sf and then developed by one of the best qb coaches ever..took him until his 7th year to even get significant snaps and was 5-5 , his 8th year his first full years as 16 game starter the 9ers were great 14-2 , he played well but daks rookie year was better statistically than that as well as 13-3 and he was ROY. seriously the dak troll hate and the selective memory of some of you border on the insane.. daks every bit as good as young ever was and he wasn't on that 9er team.
.studd maybe at the end but Daks first 6 years and Youngs first 7, no comparison.
Ah, you poor thing. You don't comprehend the difference between a comparison post between an all time great QB and an above average one, and a post/thread about shoring up weak positions? Wow. I take it you haven't been a football fan for very long.Why? We entertain your gay *** nose tackle post every year.
This is like comparing Farve and Rogers. Rogers did squat his first three years too because he was playing behind a HOF QB. When you have Montana you’re going to ride the bench as well.
As I stated I love Dak, but he’s no Young. Young is a HOF QB, two times league MVP, and the Heisman runner up. I hated the dude but he could play.