peplaw06
That Guy
- Messages
- 13,699
- Reaction score
- 413
MikeCowboy3189 said:Patrick Ramsey Pt II? You really haven't paid attention to Jordan Palmer. I go to UTEP...
InmanRoshi said:Its all about getting the ball from point A to point B.
Velocity on the ball is just one part of the equation. Other factors include vision to find the WR quickly, ability to quickly make the decision and quickness of release. You can compensate for any weakness in one area by being superior in others. If strong arm is all that mattered Ryan Leaf would have turned out better than Peyton Manning. Personally, I think arm strength is grossly overvalued, which goes a long way to explain why first round picks at the position go bust at a 50% clip. If you stare down a WR and release the ball slowly, it doesn't matter how hard you can throw it. Its going the other way.
CaptainAmerica said:Sure, a QB can compensate for weaknesses, but the best QBs in the game today are those guys like Manning, Brady, Rothlisberger, Palmer, and to some degree Leftwich and yes, even Bledsoe, who have the big-time size and the big-time arms.
Two-year starter. Very tall with a thin build. Needs to upgrade his overall strength. Pocket passer with average quickness. Can slide from pressure, but is not very elusive. Doesn't look to run. Holds the ball a bit low, but has a fairly quick release. Lacks a strong arm. Doesn't rifle the long outs, but he's an accurate passer with a good feel for touch. Sails some throws and hangs some deep balls. Leader. Eyeballs his primary target at times, but shows the ability to come off and find alternates. Generally makes good decisions. Had a good Orange Bowl.
skicat1898 said:If Romo cannot take advantage of Glenn and TO's ability to stretch the field,,, our running game will suffer,,,, and our running game needs all the help it can get.
Mr Cowboy said:Have you ever seen Romo throw the deep pass or a deep out? Or are you just going on an assumption.
I have seen him in camp numerous times, and I have seen him make all the throws. Sure his arm strength is not what Bledsoe's is, but he can make all the throws. The thing is, Bledsoe seems to be throwing fastballs on all his throws because he waits to the last moment so the reciever is clearly open, while Romo makes the throws before the reciever is out of his break. And on the deep throws, he throws the ball sooner that's why it doesn't seem like it is going as far as Beldsoe. Again, Bledsoe waits til the last second, that is why he takes so many sacks.
Merlin said:Guys that lack arm strength have to learn how to underthrow the bomb and let the receiver come back and make the catch. They will never hit a receiver in stride more than 40 yards away but underthowing is an effective way to counter a lack of arm strenth.
Romo has perfected that stop fade though or whatever you call it.
IndyCowboy said:It's my opinion that Romo would really thrive in a West Coast style of offense.
Who knows who the next coach in Dallas will be after Parcells and I don't dislike Romo at all but I think a great win/win trade would be to trade Romo to Atlanta for Matt Schaub.
Schaub is a very good 'downfield passer' that would kick azz in this current offense imo. Kind of a younger, more mobile Drew Bledsoe.
Now Atlanta is scared like hell to trade him but if they got a guy like Romo back that could run their WCO better than even Vick himself, that should be intriguing to them as well. Just a thought.
ANALYSIS
Positives: Has a tall frame with adequate muscle thickness, a big bubble with thick thighs and long, thick calves … Shows adequate quickness in his retreat from under center, showing balance standing tall in the pocket … Throws with an over-the-top motion and shows good quickness through his delivery … More effective throwing the short- and medium-route tosses … Good decision maker who will throw the ball away rather than force it into traffic … Has adequate poise in the pocket and will sacrifice his body and take the hit when his receivers are covered … Good leader and hard worker who is well-respected by his teammates … Shows touch and accuracy on his short balls and the ability to stick the pigskin into tight areas (knows when to fire the ball and put touch on passes) … Has a good feel for pressure, knowing when to step up or roll out of the pocket … Is improving his timing and anticipation skills to make sure he hits his receivers in their stride … Takes control in the huddle and will speak up when he needs to … Shows quick hands and catches the ball well while serving as the holder for extra points and field goals.
Negatives: Has good quickness, but will get "happy feet" at times and will tuck the ball away too early (will stand tall in the pocket, but needs to show more patience when running as ball security {fumbles} have been a problem) … Shows marginal arm strength in his long-ball attempts, lacking the ideal zip needed on his passes to be effective with the deep throws … Has an effective overhead delivery, but seems to drop to a three-quarter when pressured, causing him to rush the ball at times … His long tosses tend to sail on him the farther he has to throw it … Has improved his ability to scan the field, but will revert to locking on to his primary target, failing to locate other receivers (will also check down too early) … Will lose accuracy on his throws when forced to pass on the move … Despite his size, he has limited weight-room numbers (225-pound bench press).
ravidubey said:Arm strength is one of the things that separates the best QB's from the rest. It's one reason Romo went undrafted.
Bledsoe has a cannon-- that 52 yarder to Glenn probably went 55 yards in the air given the pocket and the angle and Bledsoe tossed it like it was a college three pointer.
Bledsoe's arm lets him hang in the pocket a split second longer than weaker-armed QB's; the flip side of this is the false confidence this gives Bledsoe to wait too long when the play is covered.
The deep outs (10-20 yards upfield on the sideline) are where arm strength makes the most critical difference. If your QB can throw that pass correctly and accurately you will win games because it's tough to defend and even harder to turn into a negative play.
If the QB has a weak arm, then rip that play out of the playbook because you'll see skipped passes, drops, medicine balls, and the occasional pick returned for a TD otherwise.
InmanRoshi said:Brady doesn't have a big arm, which is why he fell to the 6th round.
I don't believe Manning and Roethlesberger's arm's are much more than adequate. Neither one of those QB's are throwing 15 yard sideline outs.
If there is one common trait that all the best QB's have its accuracy and quick decision making skills. Its exponentially more important than arm strength, but its hard to gauge empirically .. which is why scouts fall back on arm strength because its not so esoteric and its something they can get their hands around.
peplaw06 said:I'm sorry...![]()
Idgit said:On purpose?
IndyCowboy said:It's my opinion that Romo would really thrive in a West Coast style of offense.
Who knows who the next coach in Dallas will be after Parcells and I don't dislike Romo at all but I think a great win/win trade would be to trade Romo to Atlanta for Matt Schaub.
Schaub is a very good 'downfield passer' that would kick azz in this current offense imo. Kind of a younger, more mobile Drew Bledsoe.
Now Atlanta is scared like hell to trade him but if they got a guy like Romo back that could run their WCO better than even Vick himself, that should be intriguing to them as well. Just a thought.