Can we save $ and cut jarwin to sign shultz?

dont need jarwin. Did he even play yesterday?
Don't get enamored with Schultz because he can catch. He is wide open....he should catch it. Not minimizing that part of the game...but he cannot block a traffic cone. Our best drive running the ball is when we took him out and lined up extra OL in the backfield and at TE. We need to find a more complete TE. With Daks limitations...we have to become a more consistent running team
 
Don't get enamored with Schultz because he can catch. He is wide open....he should catch it. Not minimizing that part of the game...but he cannot block a traffic cone. Our best drive running the ball is when we took him out and lined up extra OL in the backfield and at TE. We need to find a more complete TE. With Daks limitations...we have to become a more consistent running team
Part this true. He’s just catching easy open passes.
 
Yes they could. But will they pay Schultz market value? I dunno, even with a super low first year cap hit of min+ signing bonus.
 
Schultz missed block after block yesterday rather let him go play Jarwin and get another young TE who can block
 
Schultz missed block after block yesterday rather let him go play Jarwin and get another young TE who can block
Just what we need
One less weapon
We can’t keep Schultz because of money but it’s easy to find a blocking TE
It’s much harder to find a pass catching TE and that’s why Schultz is gonna get paid good money
 
Jarwin is a better blocking TE and a better router runner.


Because he's not blocking.
He’s not suppose to be blocking if he’s running a pass route
If all you want from the position is a blocker then put a offensive lineman there and take the TE out of the pass game
I want the receiving weapon more than the blocking weapon
I can find half a dozen guys on the roster to stick out there to do nothing but block
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,693
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top