Cap-tastrophe? The Skins' cap problem could be this big

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Sorry for re-post.....................

WarPathInsider.com:

Cap-tastrophe?
The Skins' cap problem could be this big

By Rich Tandler
Editor-in-Chief
Date: Feb 20, 2006

Tandler's Commanders Blog Ver. 02.20.06--The Commanders gambled when they signed some of their key players over the past few years. They may be on the verge of losing that gamble and the team could have a decidedly different look in 2006.

You can reach Rich Tandler by email at WarpathInsiders@comcast.net

Over the weekend, two almost identical articles by Pete Prisco of CBS Sportsline and Len Pasquarelli of ESPN.com came to almost identical conclusions in regards to the Commanders salary cap situation. They both claimed to have talked to a trio of cap experts from various places and these experts told them that the Commanders were in a cap situation that was so untenable that they may be forced to make drastic cuts to get under the cap. The Commanders, they say, may be forced to play the 2006 season with 15-20 rookies making the minimum in order to get in compliance with the cap rules. There would have to be an unprecedented bloodbath in regards to the roster.

As those two writers are notorious for their frequent anti-Commanders biases, their pieces were immediately met with derision from all around Commanders nation. “There they go again,” was the common refrain.
 

Cajuncowboy

Preacher From The Black Lagoon
Messages
27,499
Reaction score
81
Gryphon said:
Sorry for re-post.....................

WarPathInsider.com:

Cap-tastrophe?
The Skins' cap problem could be this big

By Rich Tandler
Editor-in-Chief
Date: Feb 20, 2006

Tandler's Commanders Blog Ver. 02.20.06--The Commanders gambled when they signed some of their key players over the past few years. They may be on the verge of losing that gamble and the team could have a decidedly different look in 2006.

You can reach Rich Tandler by email at WarpathInsiders@comcast.net

Over the weekend, two almost identical articles by Pete Prisco of CBS Sportsline and Len Pasquarelli of ESPN.com came to almost identical conclusions in regards to the Commanders salary cap situation. They both claimed to have talked to a trio of cap experts from various places and these experts told them that the Commanders were in a cap situation that was so untenable that they may be forced to make drastic cuts to get under the cap. The Commanders, they say, may be forced to play the 2006 season with 15-20 rookies making the minimum in order to get in compliance with the cap rules. There would have to be an unprecedented bloodbath in regards to the roster.

As those two writers are notorious for their frequent anti-Commanders biases, their pieces were immediately met with derision from all around Commanders nation. “There they go again,” was the common refrain.

Anti-Commander bias? Are these guys the antichrist? Do they hate everyone? I know they are anti Cowboy.
 

RiggoForever

Benched
Messages
875
Reaction score
0
cajuncowboy said:
Anti-Commander bias? Are these guys the antichrist? Do they hate everyone? I know they are anti Cowboy.

Lets face it, the press outside our local regions hates our teams. I think there is something about Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder that rubs people the wrong way who are not fans of their respective teams.
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
Gryphon said:
Sorry for re-post.....................

WarPathInsider.com:

Cap-tastrophe?
The Skins' cap problem could be this big

By Rich Tandler
Editor-in-Chief
Date: Feb 20, 2006

Tandler's Commanders Blog Ver. 02.20.06--The Commanders gambled when they signed some of their key players over the past few years. They may be on the verge of losing that gamble and the team could have a decidedly different look in 2006.

You can reach Rich Tandler by email at WarpathInsiders@comcast.net

Over the weekend, two almost identical articles by Pete Prisco of CBS Sportsline and Len Pasquarelli of ESPN.com came to almost identical conclusions in regards to the Commanders salary cap situation. They both claimed to have talked to a trio of cap experts from various places and these experts told them that the Commanders were in a cap situation that was so untenable that they may be forced to make drastic cuts to get under the cap. The Commanders, they say, may be forced to play the 2006 season with 15-20 rookies making the minimum in order to get in compliance with the cap rules. There would have to be an unprecedented bloodbath in regards to the roster.

As those two writers are notorious for their frequent anti-Commanders biases, their pieces were immediately met with derision from all around Commanders nation. “There they go again,” was the common refrain.


http://img142.*************/img142/6329/orly7qr.jpg
 

TheSkaven

Last Man Standing
Messages
7,021
Reaction score
5,775
Here is the full article, for those who are interested. It doesn't sound good (for them).
Notebook: Commanders close to tipping from cap
Feb. 17, 2006
By Pete Prisco
CBS SportsLine.com Senior Writer

How would you like to be Eric Schaffer, the cap man for the Washington Commanders? Your boss is the combustible Dan Snyder and your cap is a mess, so much so that two cap experts from other teams who looked at it say it's as bad as they have seen.

We pity poor Schaffer, who isn't to blame. It's not his fault Snyder throws money around as if he prints it, snubbing the reality that cap jail will eventually swallow his team whole.

"I'm glad I'm not Eric," said one of the cap experts. "That thing is a mess."

According to NFLPA figures, the Commanders have $115.4 million committed in salary for their top 51 players in 2006. The cap is expected to be $92 to $95 million. That means they have to trim $20 million or so. And that's not counting the $2 million or so the team will need to sign its rookies (thankfully, they don't have a first-round pick to pay, or that would be higher).

The Commanders have done a decent job trimming their cap down in recent years, but this time it might not be possible -- certainly not without a new collective bargaining agreement. A new agreement could help relieve some of the cap problems, but even with one, the Commanders face a daunting task.

"If they reduced everybody to a veteran minimum, and that won't happen, they'd still be $4 million over the cap," said one of the cap experts. "That's before cutting anybody."

So how did it get this bad? The Commanders have paid out big money deals under Snyder, and some of them have blown up in the team's face, leading to the chase factor. You chase bad deals with more bad deals to compensate.

Thus, they have trouble.

When room got tight in the past, they extended players' deals to create room, spreading bonus amortization out over the years. Eventually, though, it becomes time to pay the piper.

That time is now.

We would liken the Commanders' plight to a family that keeps putting off paying the credit card balance by paying minimums.

"All the deals, all the overpaying for years and moving money into future years has caught up to them," said the cap expert. "Last year they had to move $7 million in money into future years. That catches up to you at some point."

One cap expert said the Commanders might be forced to let good players walk, and could be forced to field a team with as many as 20 rookies -- or more.

If there's a new CBA, the Commanders might be able to get out from under the cap troubles a little easier, although it still will be a lot of work.

"Can you imagine the dynamics of what Schaffer is going through?" one cap expert said. "He has to go to Snyder and Joe Gibbs and tell them they have to cut players. That has to be ugly."

Cap hell. It's as ugly as it gets in the NFL, and it's a jail that's hard to get paroled out of.

Still think the Commanders will be playoff contenders?

Gibbs has his work cut out for him this season. Maybe auto racing never looked so good.

Around the league
There is talk making its way through the league that the NFL and the players association are close to agreeing on a new collective bargaining agreement. There has been steady progress the past week, giving hope to both sides. The NFL has called a special owners meeting for next week in Dallas. All the doom and gloom of the past year regarding a potential agreement has suddenly been replaced by optimism.

"There has been some good talks this week," said a league source. One issue that seemed to be clouding the talks was the improved revenue sharing between high- and low-revenue teams. But the word is the owners will wait until after a getting an agreement with the NFLPA before worrying about that problem.

The players want a higher percentage of the total revenue, which is believed to be one point that the two sides are close to agreeing on. Don't be shocked to see a new agreement in place in the next week. If that happens, the free-agency period should begin March 3 as planned. With no agreement, the opening of the free-agency period could get pushed back to April.
A guy who should be a hot free agent when the period opens, based on talks with some league personnel, is Steelers receiver Antwaan Randle El. He can do a lot of things, but here's something to consider: He isn't a down-the-field deep threat. Randle El is outstanding on the medium-range routes, but he doesn't have burning speed. He's more quick than fast. At one point during last season, the Steelers were lamenting that they didn't have the vertical threat after letting Plaxico Burress leave.

Randle El is a quality receiver, and he did have 10 plays of at least 20 yards, so there is some big-play ability there. It's just that he's not a vertical threat, even though he averaged 15.1 yards per catch.

A lot of his success comes from the way the Steelers scheme up their offense. They use a lot of bunch formations in passing downs as a way to get receivers open in crossing routes. A lot of times this leads to busts in coverage and wide-open receivers. That helped the team lead the league in yards per attempt. That number is more about scheme than speed.

Randle El is an interesting player in this free-agent market. He will help any team that signs him, but don't expect him to be a No. 1 receiver. He is a quality return man, which helps his value. But if you pay him top receiver money, do you want him returning punts and kickoffs? I like the guy, but if you're the Steelers, what do you do? Do you pay him or let him walk? Hines Ward is their go-to guy. They let Burress go last year, so the feeling is they likely will let Randle El go too if the price gets too high.
Look for the Jaguars to make a strong push to sign free-agent Saints center LeCharles Bentley. The team would love to move Brad Meester -- who played guard his first two years in the league -- back there to replace disappointing Vince Manuwai, who is a restricted free agent.

Bentley would bring nastiness to an offensive line that needs it, and word is the Jaguars have him high on their wish list. The Saints would love to keep him but are believed to be unwilling to put the franchise tag on him. That would be fine with Bentley, who would love to test the market; word is he prefers leaving.

Right tackle Maurice Williams recently said that he played much of last season with sore shoulders. Williams didn't use it as an excuse, but he didn't play as well as he had in the past, and he said that won't be the case in 2006.

If the Jaguars are to get to the next level, they have to be better along the offensive front. Quarterback Byron Leftwich is a long strider who needs space to make his throws. In fact, one defensive coordinator who has faced Leftwich said part of their plan of attack is to get pressure inside so he can't take the big step. "When that happens, his passes tend to sail," the coordinator said. "That's when he gets in trouble." It's also a reason why a player like Bentley in the middle of the line makes a lot of sense.

The Jaguars are also believed to have a strong interest in Carolina Panthers outside linebacker Will Witherspoon, who played for Jack Del Rio when Del Rio was the Panthers' defensive coordinator three years ago.

Del Rio, by the way, is still in talks on a contract extension. Word is he's asking for over $4 million per year. That's a good starting point, but he won't be getting that from Wayne Weaver. Look for the two sides to agree on a deal in the $3.2 million range with some incentives included. Del Rio is the lowest-paid coach in the league at $1.2 million, and clearly deserves a raise. But Weaver will be reluctant to give him the mega-deal he wants. One playoff appearance doesn't warrant that, but Del Rio does have this team headed in the right direction. Fair is fair, so he will get a new deal. It just won't be in the stratosphere.
If teams are looking for a run-stuffing defensive tackle, check out the name Ma'ake Kemoeatu. He is a 350-pound power player who started for the Ravens last year. He won't bring much in terms of a pass rush, but he is a force against the run.

Bentley, one of the NFL's strongest centers, raved about him after facing him during the 2005 preseason. He said Kemoeatu is the strongest player he faced. That's high praise. He's an ascending player, which makes him a good value on the market.
There have been plenty of snickers around the league at Mike Tannenbaum being named New York Jets GM. Tannenbaum is not considered a football guy, which has some real football guys scratching their heads.

Tannenbaum did have one important thing going for him in his power play -- yes, that's what it was. He was a good friend of new coach Eric Mangini. That meant something. Now Tannenbaum has the task of dealing with a serious cap issue.

"That guy's ambitious," said one league source. "It's not a surprise he pulled a coup. That's his nature." Tannenbaum has made a meteoric rise from intern to general manager. It was only a few years ago that some in the New Orleans Saints organization considered him the coffee boy.

This isn't to say Tannenbaum can't get the job done. But once again it's proof that when front office personnel and coaches tell the media they have no business writing things because they don't understand the game, we can point to the abundance of lawyer types now taking over the football side of things. Does law school make someone any more qualified to make football decisions than journalism school? I didn't think so.

By the way, the Jets have hired a new senior director of football administration. They planned to talk to John Idzik, the Arizona Cardinals director of football operations, but they canceled when they decided to hire an attorney from a prestigious law firm in Washington D.C.
The 49ers have interviewed 15 people for the front office position they are creating, but they haven't made a hire. They thought Mike Reinfeldt, the Seahawks vice president of football administration, would take the position, but he declined.

Others who have interviewed are Ray Anderson, the executive vice president of the Falcons; Bob Wallace, executive vice president of the Rams; and Bob Ferguson, former general manager of the Seahawks.

The 49ers are said to be looking for a person with 20 years experience in the league since they have such an inexperienced front office. Coach Mike Nolan is said to be pushing for an addition. Word is he has had some clashes with Paraag Marathe, the director of football operations.
The five-year extension signed by San Diego defensive tackle Jacques Cesaire is a pretty good one for a guy who doesn't start. It includes a $1.25 million signing bonus and has escalators and incentives that can earn him $5.75 million more. For example, if he plays in 60 percent of the snaps and has 6½ sacks, he can earn some of that incentive money each year. He also has a $750,000 Pro Bowl bonus in each year.

Cesaire started five games last year at defensive end. His best game came in the season finale against Denver, when he had seven tackles, five solos.
The Jets have told cornerback Ty Law he won't be back next season. He's due a bonus of $11 million in March, and there's no way the cap-strapped Jets can pay that.

Now comes the interesting question: Does anybody give him a big-money deal? He went to the Pro Bowl at 32 after getting 10 interceptions, but he's clearly not the same player he was a few years back. Any team looking at Law will likely want to give him a one- or two-year deal. Anything more than that would be risky.
Saints GM Mickey Loomis said this week the team hasn't made a decision on bringing back quarterback Aaron Brooks. The reality is that decision has been all but made. Just look at the numbers. Brooks will count $8.48 million against the cap this year with a base salary of $6.5 million. The team can save about $4.5 million on its cap by releasing him.

The Saints are expected to take a quarterback with the second overall pick in the April draft, with Southern California's Matt Leinart considered the favorite to land in that spot. Some of Brooks' Saints teammates have said they don't expect him back.
Re-signing Kyle Vanden Bosch was a top priority for the Titans, and they have to be thrilled they got the deal done Thursday. But if reports of a $15 million guarantee are accurate, that's a lot of money for a guy who has had both his knees surgically repaired.

Vanden Bosch is a try-hard player who exemplifies what coaches want. Jim Schwartz, the Titans defensive coordinator, loves the guy. But that's an awful lot to pay out for a player who came to the Titans on a one-year, $550,000 deal last spring. It's not like he's a speed rusher or anything.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
"If they reduced everybody to a veteran minimum, and that won't happen, they'd still be $4 million over the cap," said one of the cap experts. "That's before cutting anybody."

It's not the base salaries that are the problem. They have only three players with base salaries higher than $1.7 million. Their problem is the $19.51 million in roster bonuses that they thought they'd be able to prorate once the CBA was extended. They can still get under the cap, but they'll have to cut 12 players (no starters, unless you count the kicker and punter) and get 12 more players to renegotiate and extend their contracts just to put them about $530,000 under the cap -- which is barely enough cap room to sign the draft picks they'd have right now. They'll basically have no money to sign anyone but rookies for the entire offseason. And they won't have too many options left that would create any more cap room.
 

parchy

Active Member
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
3
AdamJT13 said:
It's not the base salaries that are the problem. They have only three players with base salaries higher than $1.7 million. Their problem is the $19.51 million in roster bonuses that they thought they'd be able to prorate once the CBA was extended. They can still get under the cap, but they'll have to cut 12 players (no starters, unless you count the kicker and punter) and get 12 more players to renegotiate and extend their contracts just to put them about $530,000 under the cap -- which is barely enough cap room to sign the draft picks they'd have right now. They'll basically have no money to sign anyone but rookies for the entire offseason. And they won't have too many options left that would create any more cap room.

This news made my night. Thanks, Adam.
 

Pokes28

Member
Messages
365
Reaction score
0
And that is assuming a $95 million dollar cap. The cap could be $94 million or even as low as $93 million.

If you really want to see the Skins hurt and still have league stability, wish for this:

1. No CBA breakthrough that pushes back the start of the NFL year.
2. As low a cap as possible. $93 million would crush the Skins
3. No new CBA prior to the draft (the skins would most likely not have the room to participate and would have to trade their picks to future years)
4. A new CBA in May giving the league stability for the next 5 years.

David Harrell - Pokes
dwh
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Pokes28 said:
And that is assuming a $95 million dollar cap. The cap could be $94 million or even as low as $93 million.

According to Pro Football Weekly, the latest figure teams were given is $93.25 million. That could be the preliminary figure they'll have to work with. The final figure is usually slightly higher, so it might end up less than $94 million -- if PFW's report is accurate.


3. No new CBA prior to the draft (the skins would most likely not have the room to participate and would have to trade their picks to future years)

The Skins will have more than 51 players signed, so they'll be able to use their draft picks. The only time the cap becomes a draft issue is when teams have fewer than 51 players signed, because then each draft pick adds $235,000 to the cap.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
RiggoForever said:
Lets face it, the press outside our local regions hates our teams. I think there is something about Jerry Jones and Dan Snyder that rubs people the wrong way who are not fans of their respective teams.

With Snyder its more or less due to poor PR dept. Snyder hasn't been afraid to throw temper tantrums at the press and give them little access to the organization. And before you think being secretive is a good thing, the Patriots give the media a ton of access and return the proper calls, they just don't allow the team to get distracted. It also doesn't help when you hire fanboys up in the media boxes and they go up and blatantly cheer for the Skins (a hardcore no-no in the world of sports journalism)

With Jones, there's the old adage in the media of "when in doubt, write about Dallas." That's because people either love Dallas or hate them. Since most media members are fans of other teams, they typically wind up disliking Jerry because they just don't like the Cowboys. However, for years Dallas has been outstanding in the concessions they make to the press (they went full out in Emmitt's chase for the rushing record that season) and I've seen some media members begrudgingly lay off on Jones.

Rich......
 

2much2soon

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
89
And yet certain media sources state the deadskins are in the running for top shelf FAs from TO to John Abraham to Ray Lewis.
What gives?
Someone on either side of the discussion is completely clueless.
 
Top