phildadon86
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,607
- Reaction score
- 37,797
Guess that means they wont be going after Barkley now.
cleveland just gave chiefs cornerback terrance mitchell 3 years for 12 million.
good grief. he is awful
As in Carlos Hyde, decent back but it would not preclude them from taking barkley.
It's patch work. They added a whole bunch of nothing if you ask me. Nothing to be scared about. Taylor, Landry and Hyde, oh my...NOTCleveland acquired an entire offense in one FA.
As long as they get a replacement for TT in the draft they look solid for 3rd place lol.
3 year 15mil total. Nice.
Hyde and Johnson ain't a bad duo
So much cap space and so many draft picksCleveland acquired an entire offense in one FA.
As long as they get a replacement for TT in the draft they look solid for 3rd place lol.
3 year 15mil total. Nice.
Hyde and Johnson ain't a bad duo
25-26 year old with 4 ints last year. I think that was more than all our corners combined.cleveland just gave chiefs cornerback terrance mitchell 3 years for 12 million.
good grief. he is awful
I think it does
I think they're going QB at 1 and Nelson at 4
I think that is the right decision for them
It's patch work. They added a whole bunch of nothing if you ask me. Nothing to be scared about. Taylor, Landry and Hyde, oh my...NOT
25-26 year old with 4 ints last year. I think that was more than all our corners combined.
It's patch work. They added a whole bunch of nothing if you ask me. Nothing to be scared about. Taylor, Landry and Hyde, oh my...NOT
I know, I heard you. I think the only way they become relevant is by taking Barkley.Hence my 3rd place comment, I don't think all the pieces were that great, but they did sign a lot of offensive guys.
I know, I heard you. I think the only way they become relevant is by taking Barkley.
I think it could be Chubb and a QB.
Could be
Nelson is a safer pick and they need OL help
