skinsngibbs4life;1200463 said:
You mean "fan". It's kind of hard to sum up the entire fan base by one person.
NIBGoldenchild;1201177 said:
Don't tell me you actually expected the thread starter to use logic and common sense with a thread title like that? lol
So, what you two protesters are saying is that the original thread starter over there had no support for his idea. It is only one guy, no one agreed with him? Is that right?
Without even reading the rest of the responses, looking only at the fact there are 3 pages, I think I'd like to put money on that. But I'm guessing that you won't.
Just for the sake of providing an English lesson, two or more in agreement would qualify as "fans" in any case. It doesn't have to be the entire fan base to qualify as "fans." Not by a wild stretch. Not only that, but the thread starter here could also be laughing at the sarcastic responses the thread starter there, of which I'd also bet there are a few. I mean, he did not specifically announce what the intent of hsi laughter was. Did he? Two or more would again be "fans" of course. Or do you disagree?
In fact, (though I highly doubt this) the thread starter's intent by his title could have been to get two or more negative responses to his laughter here, at the thread starter over there, of which the two of you now qualify as "fans."
I'm pretty sure I'm talking you both out of taking a bet on this. Shucks.
No charge for the lesson boys.