Clemens is no different than Bonds

[GTaylor]

And there is more damning proof against Clemens than there is with Bonds. Bonds' trainer refuses to indict Bonds while Clemens trainers flat out said they injected hgh into him. Thus far, the negative reaction against Clemens has been strong but let's see if it stays that way.

Sorry I disagree. Bonds admitted to using steroids, his testimony was the premise for Game of Shadows. Only thing they have on Clemens is the trainer's testimony. Then there are the pictures of Bonds before and after.

Clemens is a jerk and I'm no fan of his, but when it comes to being a butt there's Bonds then there is everyone else...not that it excuses Clemens, he deserves to be ripped by the media and held accountable.

 

[mr.jameswoods]

Sorry I disagree. Bonds admitted to using steroids, his testimony was the premise for Game of Shadows. Only thing they have on Clemens is the trainer's testimony. Then there are the pictures of Bonds before and after.

Clemens is a jerk and I'm no fan of his, but when it comes to being a butt there's Bonds then there is everyone else...not that it excuses Clemens, he deserves to be ripped by the media and held accountable.

You are wrong. Bonds has yet to knowingly admit using steroids. Game of Shadows doesn't state Bonds admitted using steroids. The book claims excerpts from his 2003 Grand Jury testimony. It just states Bonds admitted using a clear substance and a cream which were flaxseed oil and an arthritic balm as told by his trainer Greg Anderson. That is not the same thing as Bonds admitting he used steroids. We can assume those were steroids but that's not the same as him admitting he used them.

Clemens' trainer testified that he used human growth hormone and that he injected him with it. Bond's trainer has denied ever providing or injecting him with steroids. Greg Anderson went to jail rather than admit he gave Bonds illegal substances. Anderson was released from jail about a month ago. Thus far, the evidence against Clemens is far worse.