Cajuncowboy;1528744 said:SOmething odd about that ring though. It's nice and all, a real good looking ring, but normally, when a team wins the Sb, the ring also indentifies in some way the number of SB wins. With the Cowboys each ring either has 1 or 2 or however many diamonds representing the number of wins. The Colt's have won two SBs (the first one against us )
I guess the obvious question is does that win belong to Baltimore or to the Colts franchise?
5Stars;1528820 said:Anyone got any pictures of the eagles Superbowl ring/s..??
Wait, never mind! Major brain fart!
Erik_H;1528645 said:Does it normally have the owner's name on the side? Or is that new?
Could it be that each ring is persoanlized and that's Irsay's ring?
Cajuncowboy;1528744 said:SOmething odd about that ring though. It's nice and all, a real good looking ring, but normally, when a team wins the Sb, the ring also indentifies in some way the number of SB wins. With the Cowboys each ring either has 1 or 2 or however many diamonds representing the number of wins. The Colt's have won two SBs (the first one against us )
I guess the obvious question is does that win belong to Baltimore or to the Colts franchise?
Doomsday101;1528824 said:Missing from the ring were the diamonds that teams typically use to symbolize the number of championships won by the franchise.
In the Colts case that would be two, counting their 1970 victory when the team was still in Baltimore. Irsay opted against that for two reasons.
"We look at it as being the first one for the Indianapolis Colts," Irsay said. "And there was no need to bring up any friction."
You're definitely in the minority with that opinion. It's a very clean look. Not sure what there isn't to like about it, other than it's not a Cowboys SB ring.Bob Sacamano;1528928 said:it's fugly
seriously
5Stars;1528820 said:Anyone got any pictures of the eagles Superbowl ring/s..??
Wait, never mind! Major brain fart!