His details are often wrong and misleading.
Yes, both CW and Sua-Filo got beat multiple times, however...
The video often shows plays where they maintained their block for over 4 seconds.
In some it was 6 seconds. The expectation for pass protection is 3 seconds before things start to break down.
At 4 seconds or more it's considered the fault of the play-design or QB or receivers for not getting open (i.e. A coverage sack).
There were several plays where the defender being blocked by CW or XS-F was the 3rd or 4th defender to get to the QB.
Connor Williams played 688 regular season snaps. About 69 of those were at RG with 619 at LG.
He also played 133 snaps at LG in the playoffs. Despite that, in the video there were multiple plays of CW at RG.
Why would anybody use plays at RG to evaluate a rookie that played 752 snaps at LG but only 69 at RG?
CW also played LT in college meaning he has not spent much time on the Right Side.
It seems like the guy making the video is lazy.
Many plays not the best examples of CW or XS-F being the primary cause of the sack.
Many plays where they maintained their block for over 4 seconds.
It appears that when he is narrating is the 1st time that he has actually studied the play.
If you analyze game footage, it normally requires a few rewinds and by then you know
if the defensive player was Kawaan Short or Dontari Poe.
It's a great concept that he is going to make videos and explain what happened; however,
much like PFF is a great idea, the executing and results leave much to be desired.