Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
Golden Tate works for me.
Bob Sacamano;3325953 said:Golden Showers work for me.
SLATEmosphere;3325640 said:Thanks for the news CL
I firmly believe Martellus is going to be sent packing to Cincy in the 2nd when a guy we really like somehow tumbles at their spot.
Maybe even our 3rd,5th(from the tradeback),Carp and Spears for the Phins 2nd?
Imagine if those deals both happened AND we traded down.
4 2nd round picks?
Talk about reloading your roster.
stasheroo;3326019 said:I was thinking the same thing - about round 1.
If someone Dallas really covets is there at #21, I wonder if #27 and Marty B would be good enough?
MarionBarberThe4th;3326135 said:Marty makes the most sense. He still holds value around the league and we have depth behind him.
Ive been on a Marty and 27 to Cincy for 21 and like 4th thing for a while.
21 is an awesome spot for us to be. We have to get ET, Iupati, or Anthony Davis there.
Oh and Golden Tate is a playmaker.
21- Anthony Davis, ET, or Iupati
R2- Trade Crayton and 59 to Miami for 43 and a 6th and draft Golden Tate
UnoDallas;3326163 said:21 would be perfect for us
even NE might take Marty all they got at TE
Algee Crumpler 10 year guy
Robbie Anone 1 year UDFA
Rob Myers 1 year UDFA
R
dbair1967;3326044 said:Seriously?
IMO thats an awful deal for the Cowboys.
MarionBarberThe4th;3326135 said:Marty makes the most sense. He still holds value around the league and we have depth behind him.
Ive been on a Marty and 27 to Cincy for 21 and like 4th thing for a while.
21 is an awesome spot for us to be. We have to get ET, Iupati, or Anthony Davis there.
Oh and Golden Tate is a playmaker.
21- Anthony Davis, ET, or Iupati
R2- Trade Crayton and 59 to Miami for 43 and a 6th and draft Golden Tate
If all it would be is #27 and Bennett, that's completely fair to move up six spots. It would cost a second and/or third to get that done if you were utilizing draft choices only.CanuckCowboysFan;3326530 said:you're kidding right? if Dez was on the board at 21 or ET you wouldn't make that trade? God help us.
CanuckCowboysFan;3326530 said:you're kidding right? if Dez was on the board at 21 or ET you wouldn't make that trade? God help us.
You would not trade Bennett for a second round choice right now? If the answer is yes, then that trade is equitable.dbair1967;3326597 said:Not unless we're getting something else back. Trading Bennett just to move up 6 spots is stupid IMO. The guys too good a talent.
Alexander;3326596 said:If all it would be is #27 and Bennett, that's completely fair to move up six spots. It would cost a second and/or third to get that done if you were utilizing draft choices only.
Alexander;3326600 said:You would not trade Bennett for a second round choice right now? If the answer is yes, then that trade is equitable.
dbair1967;3326625 said:There's no way we'd have to trade our 2nd rd pick to move up 6 spots from where we are now. Technically it could probably be done for our 3rd only. Myabe even less than that.
dbair1967;3326624 said:Like I said IMO, trading him to move up 6 spots and getting nothing else back is stupid IMO.