805BoysInBlue
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,235
- Reaction score
- 9,951
Who said that?Apparently until the Cowboys have 20 all pro's, that's just not enough support for the QB.
Who said that?Apparently until the Cowboys have 20 all pro's, that's just not enough support for the QB.
How do they rank in points scored?No it doesn’t. There were 37 passes dropped. That’s a hell of a lot of drops. 3rd most in the league.
Yes. More attempts means more chances for drops.To keep it in perspective Dak was the 4th in attempts this year too
CeeDee dropped his balls!Agreed. Even Lamb. Thats gotten much better as the seasons gone on.
2.1% drops for SF (Purdy).No but natrually more throws are going to correlate to more drops....unless you're SF apparently. Just 9 drops for the entire season is crazy.
One always gives reference to the truth. Penalties also affected momentums in games earlier in the season. The team has improved...that can also be noted as well.Why do you always post negative things? And aren't you being a critic by posting it?
Hater.
Easy fella'...he sure was good this season. I'll fess up.CeeDee dropped his balls!
This QB has improved all season as did his numbers. Prescott ended up pretty productive. The team itself came together over the entire season.You must not know how to process stats. It absolutely provides context. Doesn't EXCUSE a "drop" but it also may explain why we have so many more than the AVERAGE. Every team will have drops...the # vs attempts provides context.
Unless you're a cheerleader who doesn't care about math.
Check out #225 on https://cowboyszone.com/threads/how-good-is-dak.519979/page-12#post-13316732CeeDee dropped his balls!
I would hope Purdy doesn't have a bunch of dropped balls seeing as he throws tons of screens and very short, extended handoff passes. Purdy isn't consistently slinging it down the field, where drops happen more often rather than near the line of scrimmage.2.1% drops for SF (Purdy).
Next best is Steelers (Pickett) at 3.5%.
Just blowing away the rest of the league. If there were sports journalists, they'd do a story on it.
That’s the narrative but it really isn’t true.I would hope Purdy doesn't have a bunch of dropped balls seeing as he throws tons of screens and very short, extended handoff passes. Purdy isn't consistently slinging it down the field, where drops happen more often rather than near the line of scrimmage.
I guess it just depends on what source you use, they showed on tonights game that the Chiefs were 3rd in dropshttps://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/nfl/nfl-teams-with-most-dropped-passes-this-season-bm10/
The critics aren’t’ going to like this.
its the inaccurate passes that cause the WRs to contort aand not be able to catch the ballhttps://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/nfl/nfl-teams-with-most-dropped-passes-this-season-bm10/
The critics aren’t’ going to like this.
SF is run first team. Cowboys are a pass first team.That’s the narrative but it really isn’t true.
For passes behind the LOS
Purdy - 14% of his passes
Dak - 15.2%
Passes 0-10 yards down field
Purdy - 42.3%
Dak - 48.2%
These two guys are hitting short/medium/long depth passes at about the same rate. Only real difference is that Dak has about 150 more attempts on the year than Purdy does.
Whichever source, the Cowboys are at the top.I guess it just depends on what source you use, they showed on tonights game that the Chiefs were 3rd in drops
Yes, Somehow it must be Dak's fault.https://sports.betmgm.com/en/blog/nfl/nfl-teams-with-most-dropped-passes-this-season-bm10/
The critics aren’t’ going to like this.
Naturally more throws means your running game sucks.No but natrually more throws are going to correlate to more drops....unless you're SF apparently. Just 9 drops for the entire season is crazy.
Regardless of how drops are determined, they use the same rule for every team.B.S.......completely.
Okay, how do you determine drops? Wouldn't it make sense that:
Drops=Targets- Receptions?
If not, then why are we saying that:
Catch percentage=Receptions/Targets
However, the Cowboys offensive players were targeted 605 times and had a total of 428 receptions for a total catch percentage of 70.7%
Now, assuming that targets refer only to those passes that could legitimately be caught, then this would assume that there would be
605-428 = 177 drops.
That is a difference of 177- 37 =140 passes that were thrown but not caught but not considered dropped.. How do we refer to those passes. Well, some of them could be INT's but teh Cowboys only had 10.
What are the requirements for a pass to have a target and an incompletion to be a drop?