Twitter: Cowboys, Chiefs and Bills turnovers this season

[Traye1]

You all take comfort in this while ignoring the fact that our QB missed 5 games and is now leading the NFL in INTS.

We're up there with the Chiefs and Bills directly because of Dak's turnovers.

I guarantee the Cowboys were nowhere near the Cheifs and Bills in this stat until Dak came back and starting turning the ball over like crazy.

Cooper Rush had 3 turnovers in 5 games. Dak had 3 turnovers in the first half last night!

True...but he's making it up with points scored! In his 2 losses he's averaged ppg and gave his team big leads in each loss. I'll take it...

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

What you remember is how you got in your feels when called out about your blatant anti-Dak hypocrisy. Rush was out there playing a training wheels passing game and you and your ilk were calling for him to become the full time starter. When they asked him to do more, against Philly, we saw the results. He has a backup ceiling and it showed. I know how much that bothers you.. which makes me chuckle. Give Dak a defense playing at that level and this team would be 10-0 since his return. Every sane fan knows that.. Which of course disqualifies you..

Us that were here know how you spoke about Rush.

That's why it's hard to take "winning is all that matters" when it comes from you seriously. Because that wasn't the case when Rush was the QB for you.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I thought you meant half the difference between Dak and Cooper.

come on now. don't spin.

btw, the difference as it stands today is 1.2 interceptions per game vs. 0.8 interceptions per game. a less than half interception per game difference.....basically one interception difference every two games.

point differential!!! average with Rush was 19.8 offensive output, vs. 34.8.... the differential is 15 points per game.....we only scored less than Rush's highest output in one game, 24 against detroit....

so you would rather have 0.5 less interceptions per game but 15 points less?

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

The same goes for Rush then. He had at least 3 drops picks against Cincy and 2 picks were called back from penalty......


All that being said I don't care who is responsible or who to blame. The turnovers have to stop if this team wants to go anywhere this postseason. I think we can agree on that

And also against the Bengals, went almost the entire 2nd half without leading the offense to scoring, until Maher kicked the GW FG in the final seconds. That game would have been a loss if the defense was playing then like they have been playing over the last few weeks. For as much as some want to keep on selling the notion of Rush being the main reason for the Cowboys going 4-1 with him,

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

come on now. don't spin.

btw, the difference as it stands today is 1.2 interceptions per game vs. 0.8 interceptions per game. a less than half interception per game difference.....basically one interception difference every two games.

point differential!!! average with Rush was 19.8 offensive output, vs. 34.8.... the differential is 15 points per game.....we only scored less than Rush's highest output in one game, 24 against detroit....

so you would rather have 0.5 less interceptions per game but 15 points less?

I'd rather not have a QB that leads the NFL in INTs despite missing 5 games.

Why you guys are okay with that is beyond me.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

Us that were here know how you spoke about Rush.

That's why it's hard to take "winning is all that matters" when it comes from you seriously. Because that wasn't the case when Rush was the QB for you.

no, he was realistic about Rush...knowing that Rush was going downhill fast and that we would end up with a losing record if Rush continued to be the QB.... you want to argue that he had 5-1 record and then would have gone 10-2 perhaps since you often extrapolate like that.... but reality is rush got continuously worse culminating in his last two games as down right pathetic performances which one we won because defense dominated and scored almost as much as the opponent.

so yeah, he cares more about the team, because he knew rush would doom this team. you care more about being right, because you want rush to be the QB of the team....knowing deep inside he gave the team no chance.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

I'd rather not have a QB that leads the NFL in INTs despite missing 5 games.

Why you guys are okay with that is beyond me.

again would you rather have a QB with no interceptions and half the output in points?

I am not OK with interceptions...nice spin though...but a fail nevertheless.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

no, he was realistic about Rush...knowing that Rush was going downhill fast and that we would end up with a losing record if Rush continued to be the QB.... you want to argue that he had 5-1 record and then would have gone 10-2 perhaps since you often extrapolate like that.... but reality is rush got continuously worse culminating in his last two games as down right pathetic performances which one we won because defense dominated and scored almost as much as the opponent.

so yeah, he cares more about the team, because he knew rush would doom this team. you care more about being right, because you want rush to be the QB of the team....knowing deep inside he gave the team no chance.

4-1 with Rush eats at you.

You guys truly wish we would've lost all those games so you can pretend that only Dak can do anything with this team.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

again would you rather have a QB with no interceptions and half the output in points?

I am not OK with interceptions...nice spin though...but a fail nevertheless.

I'm not doing these hypothetical with you anymore

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

I'd rather not have a QB that leads the NFL in INTs despite missing 5 games.

Why you guys are okay with that is beyond me.

I'd rather have an offense which doesn't have to constantly rely on the defense to hold teams to under 20 points and one TD per game. Which is in no way going to put a team in better position to make a deep run in the playoffs than those INTs will.

 

[phildadon86]

I'd rather not have a QB that leads the NFL in INTs despite missing 5 games.

Why you guys are okay with that is beyond me.

I don’t think anyone is ok with with. At all. What I do think is even if he wasn’t leading the nfl despite missing 5 games you’d be on here griping about something else.

I saw earlier you were saying you’d trade the interceptions for less points scored? 4 weeks ago you were in the thread complaining about Dak not throwing for 300 yards..so. Yeah that’s not true either.

Whatever Dak does you will say something. It’s fine. We all know it. You have great takes on other things football that you’re actually objective about so those are the ones I’ll be conversing with you on.

Anyone that says Dak is at fault for all 3 turnovers last night is beyond helping. But hey that’s ok for you to believe. All I know is. I saw our players dropping like flies last night and the least of my concerns right now are daks ints and more so getting healthy for the playoffs. Especially on the OL and DL.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

I don’t think anyone is ok with with. At all. What I do think is even if he wasn’t leading the nfl despite missing 5 games you’d be on here griping about something else.

I saw earlier you were saying you’d trade the interceptions for less points scored? 4 weeks ago you were in the thread complaining about Dak not throwing for 300 yards..so. Yeah that’s not true either.

Whatever Dak does you will say something. It’s fine. We all know it. You have great takes on other things football that you’re actually objective about so those are the ones I’ll be conversing with you on.

Anyone that says Dak is at fault for all 3 turnovers last night is beyond helping. But hey that’s ok for you to believe. All I know is. I saw our players dropping like flies last night and the least of my concerns right now are daks ints and more so getting healthy for the playoffs. Especially on the OL and DL.

124 yards away.

I think I'm more right about things than I am wrong about things. Yous should know this seeing as how you're going to lose a bet to me.

 

[starfan1]

no because if you watch other games you will see all QBs have almost INTs.

Why you guys even humor that agenda driven hater is beyond me

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

4-1 with Rush eats at you.

You guys truly wish we would've lost all those games so you can pretend that only Dak can do anything with this team.

Does it eat at the Anti-Dak crowd, who were making up scenarios of what would happen if Dak comes back and the team starts to lose games? Did they want the Cowboys to lose upon Dak's return to prove their narrative about Cooper Rush being better or the offense being better with Cooper Rush?

 

[phildadon86]

124 yards away.

I think I'm more right about things than I am wrong about things. Yous should know this seeing as how you're going to lose a bet to me.

Yup. Just as expected. You care more about being right than reading what I wrote. Or this teams success. Congrats. Zeke didn’t hit 1000 yards. You’re soooooo smart. I wish I could be like you.
Feel better? Only a narcissist would feel the need to completely devalue what someone just wrote to say “I was right”

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

4-1 with Rush eats at you.

You guys truly wish we would've lost all those games so you can pretend that only Dak can do anything with this team.

no, it doesn't I am very greatful. but I am also a Dallas over Bash Dak, knowing we had no chance to continue the success if Rush was to play rest of the year. I am a realist, not an agenda driven Bash Dak over Dallas crowd.

If we had lost all those games, I would have wished for Dak not to return so that we end up with a top 5 pick and ability to pick a QB perhaps.

therein lies the difference between Bash Dak over Dallas crowd and the rest of us

 

[CanadianCowboysFan]

Why you guys even humor that agenda driven hater is beyond me

good point

 

[Oz-of-Cowboy-Country]

I'd rather not have a QB that leads the NFL in INTs despite missing 5 games.

Why you guys are okay with that is beyond me.

We are not okay with it. But we are smart enough to not worry about things we can't change or control. So we don't harp on it like you do.

 

[RonnieT24]

Us that were here know how you spoke about Rush.

That's why it's hard to take "winning is all that matters" when it comes from you seriously. Because that wasn't the case when Rush was the QB for you.

Aint no "Us." Just you and a couple of your fellow moronic anti-Dakkers got mad because you got called out for canonizing Rush and his 150 yards a game passing attack while putting up 20 points a game. If the defense was playing like it has the last three weeks Rush would have gone 0-5 and you know it. But you can't bring yourself to acknowledge it.

 

[DFWJC]

Our lack of fumbles has helped!