cowboyjoe;4033672 said:Cowboys currently $6.7 million over cap, must re-do contracts of Romo, Austin and Ware to get under by 3p Friday.
cowboyjoe;4033672 said:richiewhittRichie Whitt
Cowboys currently $6.7 million over cap, must re-do contracts of Romo, Austin and Ware to get under by 3p Friday. #Cowboys
39 seconds agoFavoriteRetweetReply
Cowboys22;4033679 said:Does that include all the signings including Elam? If so then they are in great shape because they can create much more room than that.
EGG;4033682 said:Would have been smart to redo those contracts last year, being an uncapped year, and paying out the majority of the contracts.... supposedly this is what Washington did, enabling them to wash away their past cap sins.
EGG;4033682 said:Would have been smart to redo those contracts last year, being an uncapped year, and paying out the majority of the contracts.... supposedly this is what Washington did, enabling them to wash away their past cap sins.
cowboys2233;4033674 said:Championship!
Cowboys22;4033701 said:Yes, but teams were told all along they would be held accountable for everything they did in the uncapped years and that those dumped cap dollars would be brought forward once the cap came back. That did not happen and a few select teams that didn't head the warning benefited greatly. It is the biggest injustice with the new CBA. If they were going to do that, they should have given all teams 24 hours to release players in the same fashion so that everyone could start the new CBA on the same footing.
burmafrd;4033680 said:and the world is round. About as surprising.
zrinkill;4033711 said:What does that even mean?
I will Be so glad when they flush.
cowboys2233;4033719 said:more simplistic and obvious for you in the future.
zrinkill;4033724 said:Only thing that is simplistic and obvious is your trolling.
cowboys2233;4033713 said:I'm with you, especially if they said those cap dollars would still exist. That is total BS and really makes a mockery of the whole system.
Cowboys22;4033738 said:I have seen AdamJT post several times and even saw it in an article that teams were told numerous times that any salary dumps during the uncapped years would have to be accounted for under a new salary cap. Somehow, they didn't include that in the new CBA and didn't allow teams that headed the warnings to even up with the teams that did not.
Cowboys22;4033701 said:Yes, but teams were told all along they would be held accountable for everything they did in the uncapped years and that those dumped cap dollars would be brought forward once the cap came back. That did not happen and a few select teams that didn't head the warning benefited greatly. It is the biggest injustice with the new CBA. If they were going to do that, they should have given all teams 24 hours to release players in the same fashion so that everyone could start the new CBA on the same footing.
EGG;4033784 said:Wow, I had not heard that,,, that's freaking ridiculous. Why would everybody vote to let the cheaters off the hook?
Cowboys22;4033951 said:It was either overlooked or a concession by the owners. This is the 2nd time the skins have been bailed out. The first was when the owners voted in 2009 to opt out of the old CBA. Had they voted the other way, the skins would have been close to $40 million over the cap and would have had like 2 days to get under it. Once the owners opted out, it created the uncapped year and the skins were off the hook. They proceeded in the two uncapped years to undo all the salary cap damage they had been built up and it was all washed away with the new CBA. So, they got bailed out twice and are now sitting there close to $20 million under the cap after all those years and all those ridiculous signings.
