NeonDeion21
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,500
- Reaction score
- 1,065
According to Broaddus, the Cowboys are falling in love with Upshaw and his versatility.
GloryDaysRBack;4376539 said:did you hear this on the radio?
jblaze2004;4376555 said:spencer looked better in college then upshaw. Idk if he is in play at 14. Seems like a reach. He is a good all around guy but is not a beast rushing the passer. Basically he seems like another spencer. Just a rookie. Maybe he has a better motor. IDK.
But he is probably the most ready to play SOLB as a rookie.
MichaelWinicki;4376592 said:Well said.
JeffInDC;4376654 said:Remember, Spencer played DE in college, NOT OLB. So, that's like comparing apples to oranges.
SDogo;4376620 said:Yeah...............on January 14th.
And again, we have Upshaw, his name is Spencer.
Dough Boy;4376691 said:I'm not a fan of Upsahw @ 14. I would not pull the trigger but I see the logic if Spencer walks and DeCastro is gone.
I will say this. I think Upshaw and Ingram have a higher & more consistent motor than Spencer. For what it's worth, I would keep Spencer for 4-5 million/year.
And I think Ingram has more versatility. He's played DT, DE and OLB.
MichaelWinicki;4376850 said:Yep to a certain extent.
The only difference is that I would consider one of the top corners at #14 also.
If the top corners are gone and DeCastro is gone, I'm looking to trade down.
unionjack8;4377665 said:god i hope not, that would set us back immensly. The guy is AVERAGE
RS12;4376513 said:When i watch him I see a solid guy, more solid than Spencer, but not a difference or play maker. 14 has to be a difference maker not an upgrade.
DAL @ PHI
LAR ARI
22%
IND TEN
13%
CAR @PHI
10%
