Cowboys inactives

Brown, Iupati, Humphries, and Buchanon are inactive for the Cardinals..

And yall complaining about Tapper

Lol
 
Wood said:
I think they see Taco as long term play here and probably feel from confidence standpoint it would be detrimental to make him inactive.
Click to expand...

I don't think giving up on Tapper is a good idea regardless. He's as young as Taco and has as high of a ceiling. Definitely not a progress stopper. If you want to let young guys develop in place of progress stoppers, sit Moore and Mayowa.
 
GloryDaysRBack said:
Brown, Iupati, Humphries, and Buchanon are inactive for the Cardinals..

And yall complaining about Tapper

Lol
Click to expand...

And they'll still be more prepared and make more splash plays than this team. I firmly believe if we win this game it will be because we got out of our own way just enough.
 
JoeyBoy718 said:
I don't think giving up on Tapper is a good idea regardless. He's as young as Taco and has as high of a ceiling. Definitely not a progress stopper. If you want to let young guys develop in place of progress stoppers, sit Moore and Mayowa.
Click to expand...

I think this team is beyond the stage of just playing the young guys to get experience for the future. We have enough talent on offense to do some serious damage in the playoffs. Right now the best players, those producing the best, should be on the field.
 
texbumthelife said:
And they'll still be more prepared and make more splash plays than this team. I firmly believe if we win this game it will be because we got out of our own way just enough.
Click to expand...

I don't see you breaking the CowboysZone pre-game huddle anytime soon.
 
Risen Star said:
I don't have an issue with Taco. He's your 1st round pick. It's Mayowa that bothers me.

This is pars defect discrimination.
Click to expand...
I like the Tap man but Mayowa was the only other DE besides Lawrence that was able to generate any type of pass rush against the Donkeys.
 
Risen Star said:
You mean Kellen Moore right?
Click to expand...

Haha he should never be active. What I meant was Damontre Moore, though I don't think he should be inactive since he's probably sadly our best RDE. I just don't see the point of sitting a young guy with potential for another young guy with potential. Moore and Mayowa are likely not in our long term plans. Sit one of them if your goal is to develop your young guys. I'd prefer to sit Mayowa. He'll be gone next year and isn't much better than the rookies.
 
JoeyBoy718 said:
Haha he should never be active. What I meant was Damontre Moore, though I don't think he should be inactive since he's probably sadly our best RDE. I just don't see the point of sitting a young guy with potential for another young guy with potential. Moore and Mayowa are likely not in our long term plans. Sit one of them if your goal is to develop your young guys. I'd prefer to sit Mayowa. He'll be gone next year and isn't much better than the rookies.
Click to expand...

Mayowa not Moore. There's no reason why he can't be a long term player here.
 
It's not like they are sitting Deacon Jones. Outside of Lawrence, these guys are all the same at DE.
 
I don't actually get the love for D. Moore.

Did I miss something? Dont get me wrong, I'd love for him to be a player, just seems like some serious undeserved hype.
 
You have to ask... What kind of awful pictures of Jason Garrett does Alfred Morris have in his possession??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 9,077 (members: 33, guests: 9,044)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,577
Messages
13,819,756
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top