Jane Slater of NFL Network reports the Cowboys will rest Ezekiel Elliott against the Giants in Week 17.
I would play him for at least a series, just to keep his head in it.Yep..Just heard it on NFL network. I think its a stupid move. He needs to get at least "some" carries. We never seem to learn..........
This team isn’t the third string level of talent on those early 90s teams. Zeke is the the most important part on offense he needs a week w/o being run into the ground.I wonder,.....Did the 90,s Cowboys rest star players in that 16th game? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
He leads the NFL in carries by 48 and in total touches by 50.Yep..Just heard it on NFL network. I think its a stupid move. He needs to get at least "some" carries. We never seem to learn..........
I wonder,.....Did the 90,s Cowboys rest star players in that 16th game? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I agree this is totally different then pre season. In preseason they were not in football shape and didnt have any game time reps. This is the end of the season and we have Nothing to gain in this gain but we have a lot to lose if Zeke, Cooper martin Smith or even Dak gets hurt. Our offense has struggled but we all can agree it is worse without these guys. They have been practicing resting them this game IMO is a smart move.Yeah nothing for them to really gain in this game.. Looks to be cold and snowing right now. Dak probably won't play the whole game either.
And Garrett didn't seem to care when he was using him in the 4th quarter of that Colts game when it was out of hand. Also last year's Philly game when it meant nothing.Yep..Just heard it on NFL network. I think its a stupid move. He needs to get at least "some" carries. We never seem to learn..........
I think if they came out at full power and made it a commitment to have a solid drive or two, like you would in the 2nd exhibition game, it would have helped.No game is “meaningless”... work on the offense to get it as proficient as you can before the playoffs.
Pretty sure his head will never be out of itI would play him for at least a series, just to keep his head in it.
The only way this makes a ton of sense is if they really had a roster crunch for the 46 and want to activate a player or two that normally would not be.

Makes no sense until you start thinking that perhaps who to play and not to play isn't coming from him alone.And Garrett didn't seem to care when he was using him in the 4th quarter of that Colts game when it was out of hand.
