dargonking999
DKRandom
- Messages
- 12,578
- Reaction score
- 2,057
If we could have used our 2nd, instead of clevands. I would be all over this
but we might lose out on a WR, because of it
but we might lose out on a WR, because of it
Bizwah;1474092 said:Now, we got screwed.
cowboyfan4life_mark;1474061 said:So we moved down 4 spots, gave up 87 and 159 for a 2008 1st rounder.
peplaw06;1474102 said:
InmanRoshi;1474037 said:Trade up for #26 ... #36, #87 (3rd) and #159 (5th)
InmanRoshi;1474037 said:Trade up for #26 ... #36, #87 (3rd) and #159 (5th)
One of them wasn't ours originallyBizwah;1474116 said:We gave up two first day picks......I don't like doing that.
peplaw06;1474165 said:One of them wasn't ours originally
So if I told you we'd have to give up our 3rd and 5th for a first rounder (probably top 5-10 next year) in lieu of filling one of those spots on the first day, you wouldn't do it?Bizwah;1474187 said:Like I said earlier.
We still need help at so many positions to really solidify our roster.
FS
DT
WR
CB
OL
How can we do this now?
We have one more pick in the first day.
Bizwah;1474156 said:With all the youth we need to add, trading away three picks (to a division rival) is a bad idea.
IMO we still need starters at FS and CB (I think Henry's spent and Glenn is too old). We have NO DEPTH at DT. We NEED youth at WR and the OL.
Too many needs to force the issue....and we did force the issue. I think we could've traded for another pick lower down.....for a lot less. Jerry just panics when his guy is on the board.
Joe a Cowboys fan;1474198 said:I think we still have good options for FS Biz and maybe DT and WR. Cover corners are pretty much gone and OL we might just gamble some more on.
Bizwah;1474187 said:Like I said earlier.
We still need help at so many positions to really solidify our roster.
FS
DT
WR
CB
OL
How can we do this now?
We have one more pick in the first day.