Cowboys Rookie of the Year - Nick Folk

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Agree completely but must admit when it first announced we drafted Folk all I could wonder was why since we had Gramatica. Well, now we all know, as if we didn't know after the Bills game, how good a pick Folk was. He's solved our FG problems so well that I early in the season stopped leaving the room or closing my eyes when our FG kicker came in cause I just know whoever the kicker was he would miss. Thank God for Folk.

Also really liked Deon Anderson and sorry he had to go on IR. Have no doubt he will really improve after participating in our offseason weight conditioning program. I expect him to be our starting FB for several years since he can block and also contribute to our passing game. Wonder if he can also run with the ball.

Cowboys Awards: Rookie of the Year

9:32 AM Wed, Jan 23, 2008 | Permalink
Albert Breer http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips
The third in a seven-part awards series ...
K NICK FOLK
Here’s a third consecutive award that really wasn’t that hard to sort out. With a rookie class that included a bevy of developmental prospects, it’s Folk in a walk here. And he really may have wrapped this one up on Oct. 8, the night he went from anonymous to Pro Bowl candidate.
That was the night, in a hostile environment in Buffalo, he hit what Terrell Owens called a 106-yard game-winning field. It was actually back-to-back, 53-yarders, but they might as well have had three-figure distance the way they made Folk’s legend grow. There really wasn’t much tailing off from there, either. Three of Folk’s five misses were from 50-plus yards out, another was blocked, and none of them were in the second half of any game.
If any rookie steps in and becomes the answer at a position of tumult, they deserve to win a category like this. And that’s just what Folk did. If there’s anything to complain about, it’d have to be distance on his kickoffs, which didn’t help the questionable cover units much.

RUNNERS UP
FB Deon Anderson:
When Oliver Hoyte went down, the UConn product became a starter, and was the team’s primary fullback for a 6-game stretch, proving to be more than adequate in the role. And he was a key special teamer before going on injured reserve for the final eight games of the year.
OLB Anthony Spencer: Sure, he was displaced in the starting lineup by Greg Ellis. But he was a very, very solid first-teamer for six games, and flashed the pass-rushing ability he was drafted for. That pass rush was never more dangerous than when Spencer was put out there with Ellis and DeMarcus Ware.
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
Anderson going down had a much greater impact on our running game then the writers articulated to fans.

Our Cowboys offense started having trouble when Anderson went on IR.
 

ddh33

Active Member
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
2
I agree. I thought Deon Anderson outplayed Oliver Hoyte this season.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
ddh33;1923015 said:
I agree. I thought Deon Anderson outplayed Oliver Hoyte this season.

Same here, I look forward to getting him back next season.
 

JPM

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,301
Reaction score
1,236
Doomsday101;1923022 said:
Same here, I look forward to getting him back next season.
I look forward to him competing with Owen Schmitt.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
JPM;1923034 said:
I look forward to him competing with Owen Schmitt.

I would like to get him but I have big doubts the Cowboys will take a FB in day 1 of the draft.
 

Big Country

Rolling Thunder
Messages
3,761
Reaction score
40
Doomsday101;1923038 said:
I would like to get him but I have big doubts the Cowboys will take a FB in day 1 of the draft.

why do you think that doom?

If he's worth it, why not
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
ddh33;1923015 said:
I agree. I thought Deon Anderson outplayed Oliver Hoyte this season.

That wasn't Wade's analysis - he RARELY commented on stuff like that but he clearly said that if Hoyte was available he would play instead of Anderson
 

ddh33

Active Member
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
2
abersonc;1923051 said:
That wasn't Wade's analysis - he RARELY commented on stuff like that but he clearly said that if Hoyte was available he would play instead of Anderson

I know it. I suppose Wade could have been emphasizing that a player doesn't lose his job due to injury. Could be that Hoyte did a lot of little things that I just don't notice or appreciate as much. Likewise, could have been that Deon was doing a bunch of little things wrong. Either way, I actually felt better when Deon was on the field. I do think that Hoyte was more hurt than was let on...
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
aardvark;1923050 said:
why do you think that doom?

If he's worth it, why not

Because I think Dallas will be looking for BPA than fill a need and I think there will be some areas that the team will be looking at other than FB. I'm not opposed to getting Owen Schmitt I just don't see Dallas doing it.
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Wade said that but when Anderson first took over. Later as Anderson improved and began catching passes from Romo, we all knew Anderson would eventually be our starter. Too bad Anderson got hurt and Hoyte filled in pretty good as a blocker. Anderson will really benefited from participating in our offseason weight conditioning program. Additionally he will have a lot more opportunity in minicamps and preseason to improve his blocking technique in our system and Houch will sure help him. I don't really don't see us drafting a FB in the first 3 rounds cause we gotta more important needs; i.e. WR/CB/RB/ILB. I think starting in the 4th round we'll draft BPA except for maybe TE or even a 2nd CB or WR who shouldn't be there when it's our turn.
 

Big Country

Rolling Thunder
Messages
3,761
Reaction score
40
Doomsday101;1923076 said:
Because I think Dallas will be looking for BPA than fill a need and I think there will be some areas that the team will be looking at other than FB. I'm not opposed to getting Owen Schmitt I just don't see Dallas doing it.

But... if he's the BPA available at the time Dallas picks...

Git - R - Done!!!;)
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
aardvark;1923815 said:
But... if he's the BPA available at the time Dallas picks...

Git - R - Done!!!;)

If that is also a need. I agree with John McClain and have believed for a long time no one drafts purely on BPA they draft BPA who fill a need. I say right now I don't care if BPA at Dallas 1st pick is a TE Dallas is not going to draft a TE. If Dallas feels the need to get a FB and Schmitt is on the board then yes take him.
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
aardvark;1923815 said:
But... if he's the BPA available at the time Dallas picks...

Git - R - Done!!!;)

Tell you what, if I'm a linebacker, safety, or corner looking at a Schmidt/Barber duo bearing down on me....I'm not pleased.
 

BlueStar II

New Member
Messages
1,815
Reaction score
1
Doomsday101;1923022 said:
Same here, I look forward to getting him back next season.

:star: I agree about Anderson's contributions, and I'm looking forward to him getting back on the field, especially after he's had the opportunity to go through the off-season workouts and training.
 
Top