As much as I'd like nothing better than to swallow that PFF rating, I'll take it with a grain of salt. I think they're rating Mo on what he did previous to his groin injury and Carr's rating seems overstated, based upon it being for his number of starts. They may be OK but #1? That's pushing it, folks.
Yup, I never took PFF's rankings very seriously, and in this case #1 does seem pretty far-fetched... however, if our secondary is even 50% as good as what they are claiming, that's still better than what I would have expected.
Hard to tell. If you just look at yards, our run defense was best in the league and our pass defense was one of the worst. But if you let your eyes do the test, I can't think of a year when I thought so many of our DBs played well. How can we be having career years from so many guys yet we're still worse than we were when they were having their worst years? Make no sense.
Right, so I suppose if you looked at each guy in our secondary
individually, it may look like a very good group on paper. And maybe that's where this ranking is coming from. However as a collective group, in practice, I don't know if #1 is exactly right. But still, nice to think that
someone is giving our secondary props.
