CCBoy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 46,795
- Reaction score
- 22,477
...and the home of the...brave!Jerry does a great job!
...and the home of the...brave!Jerry does a great job!
Ok a quick read the Spotrac link again… The discrepancy apparently arises because there are some players still on the payroll that are not on the team. Example: WR Dennis Houston who is still on the books. And some players are listed twice on the STs count. I don’t know why. Again, I’m just using the numbers provided by Spotrac..I'm thinking that since YOU created the thread about the Cowboys spending on players - especially with YOU comparing the team's rankings leaguewide from last year to this year - YOU would have done the research on the Spotrac information having some number discrepancies - and have an explanation for it.
It appears to me to that is a project YOU should follow up on.
They should rank by average salary, not cap hit.It’s always interesting to see how each team spends their cap space. This year the numbers spent on offense are very much lower overall than years prior.
Here is a list of what the Cowboys spend by sides of the ball as well as position and how it ranks in the NFL. This is obviously including some players that will eventually not be on the roster after cuts.
OFFENSE: 35 players; $104.341 million; 44.80 of the total cap space. NFL RANK: #17 (Last yr #2)
DEFENSE: 36 players; $96.779; 41.55% of the cap space; NFL RANK: 18 (last yr #26)
SPECIAL TEAMS: 4 players; $5.782 million; 2.66% of the cap space: NFL RANK: #20 (last yr #22)
POSITION RANKINGS
Interesting that we were the #2 paid offense in the NFL last year, and #17 this year. That will certainly change when Cedee Lamb gets his deal. We are certainly spending less at RB, OL and TE this year. I believe Zack Martin will get a new deal at some point this summer which will change the OL positional spending.
- QB- 3 players; $30.037 million; 12.9% of cap; NFL RANK: 4 (last yr #10)
- RB- 5 players; $13.877 million; 5.96% of the cap; NFL RANK: 6 (last yr #1)
- WR- 13 players; $25.806 million; 11.08% of the cap; NFL RANK: 17 (last yr #26)
- TE- 7 players; $6.23 million; 2.71% of the cap; NFL RANK: 28 (last yr #5)
- OL- 15 players; $38.143 million; 16.38 % of the cap; NFL RANK: 24 (last yr #6)
- DL- 14 players; $42.428 million; 18.22% of the cap; NFL RANK: 13 (last yr #16)
- LB- 8 players; $13.539 million; 5.81% of the cap; NFL RANK: 27 (last yr #22)
- Secondary- 18 players; $47.550 million; 20.42% of the cap; NFL RANK: 4 (last yr #13)
- STs- 4 players; $5.78 million; 2.66% of the cap; NFL RANK: 20 (last yr #22)
If you want took at individuals pay or just browse where I got this info, I highly recommend this link to Spotrac:
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/positional/2023/full-cap/
Thoughts?
SpotracThey should rank by average salary, not cap hit.
Dak's AAV is 40M. The 30M for all 3 QBs is misleading.
But you are trying to pull in money that is not paid out. It's about the cap hit on a given year.They should rank by average salary, not cap hit.
Dak's AAV is 40M. The 30M for all 3 QBs is misleading.
It makes perfect sense if you just use percentages to compare spending per position.But you are trying to pull in money that is not paid out. It's about the cap hit on a given year.
Because if you do it by AAV then the total will end up 1.5 times the cap and that makes no sense.
I understand…it does make some sense X. BUT… It’s just not how the league counts it though. There are several things the NFL does that doesn’t make total sense to me.It makes perfect sense if you just use percentages to compare spending per position.
AAV per player X 53 = Total AAV
Player AAV / Total AAV = % of Total
Doing it by cap hit on a per year basis makes no sense. Any big contract player not restructured will have a large cap hit. The player gets paid the same with or without the restructure, it just changes when the team takes the cap, now or later.
I was so glad that they didn't break the bank on Schultz. Maybe they're starting to learn their lesson about giving big money to average players.Not resigning Schultz made a huge impact at TE and offense overall.
It certainly breaks the “we like our above average guys” trend.I was so glad that they didn't break the bank on Schultz. Maybe they're starting to learn their lesson about giving big money to average players.
Schultz was overvalued because most just see his receiving numbers. Luckily the Cowboys didn't. There is far more than just fantasy numbers to consider.I was so glad that they didn't break the bank on Schultz. Maybe they're starting to learn their lesson about giving big money to average players.
He was the #2 receiving player at over 700 yards below CD Lamb...hit and miss blocker.Schultz was overvalued because most just see his receiving numbers. Luckily the Cowboys didn't. There is far more than just fantasy numbers to consider.
But then each team has contracts in different years, having been extended, etc. And then no two team will have same.total.cap. it makes no sense.It makes perfect sense if you just use percentages to compare spending per position.
AAV per player X 53 = Total AAV
Player AAV / Total AAV = % of Total
Doing it by cap hit on a per year basis makes no sense. Any big contract player not restructured will have a large cap hit. The player gets paid the same with or without the restructure, it just changes when the team takes the cap, now or later.
We will see how much of an impact it will make on our offense overall. Hopefully none but I am not sure about that. Great post about our cap. Very informative.Not resigning Schultz made a huge impact at TE and offense overall.
It changes every year. New deals make it go up, old deals go down. The age of a contract is key. Take Martin, his deal was at the top when he signed it but it has sense became a middle of the road contract. That’s just how it works. A record contract today won’t be longIt’s always interesting to see how each team spends their cap space. This year the numbers spent on offense are very much lower overall than years prior.
Here is a list of what the Cowboys spend by sides of the ball as well as position and how it ranks in the NFL. This is obviously including some players that will eventually not be on the roster after cuts.
OFFENSE: 35 players; $104.341 million; 44.80 of the total cap space. NFL RANK: #17 (Last yr #2)
DEFENSE: 36 players; $96.779; 41.55% of the cap space; NFL RANK: 18 (last yr #26)
SPECIAL TEAMS: 4 players; $5.782 million; 2.66% of the cap space: NFL RANK: #20 (last yr #22)
POSITION RANKINGS
Interesting that we were the #2 paid offense in the NFL last year, and #17 this year. That will certainly change when Cedee Lamb gets his deal. We are certainly spending less at RB, OL and TE this year. I believe Zack Martin will get a new deal at some point this summer which will change the OL positional spending.
- QB- 3 players; $30.037 million; 12.9% of cap; NFL RANK: 4 (last yr #10)
- RB- 5 players; $13.877 million; 5.96% of the cap; NFL RANK: 6 (last yr #1)
- WR- 13 players; $25.806 million; 11.08% of the cap; NFL RANK: 17 (last yr #26)
- TE- 7 players; $6.23 million; 2.71% of the cap; NFL RANK: 28 (last yr #5)
- OL- 15 players; $38.143 million; 16.38 % of the cap; NFL RANK: 24 (last yr #6)
- DL- 14 players; $42.428 million; 18.22% of the cap; NFL RANK: 13 (last yr #16)
- LB- 8 players; $13.539 million; 5.81% of the cap; NFL RANK: 27 (last yr #22)
- Secondary- 18 players; $47.550 million; 20.42% of the cap; NFL RANK: 4 (last yr #13)
- STs- 4 players; $5.78 million; 2.66% of the cap; NFL RANK: 20 (last yr #22)
If you want took at individuals pay or just browse where I got this info, I highly recommend this link to Spotrac:
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/positional/2023/full-cap/
Thoughts?