Cowboys the team to beat in the East?

[MileyDancer]

Good article, homie.

 

[Melonfeud]

Very well done.

But of course it was ,as it took superlative and immense talent that's seldom appreciated,,, you,friend! Certainly have an eye for quality,,,

 

[Melonfeud]

Other than what could be construed as heaping praise on 'Dwayne Harris'
( seriously, that guy under preformed,,, progressively for us) I thought it was a solid piece that left enough of the ' what if/ unforseen variables' of the Easts draft up to the reader/viewer to take away what they wanted to from it.
( which in reality, is pretty much all a writer/poster could ask for,,,er,,,other than that single disgruntled comment section poster who is obviously just a natural born hater)

 

[ShiningStar]

And Dallas had 13, the Giants, 11.

yes and as i stated no one is dominant with a 1 and done in the playoffs. so did out 13 wins make us dominant? no.

 

[BourbonBalz]

the nfl goes by wins, not "how close were you"

Yep, and we had two more than the Giants. It would've been three more had we played to win the last game.

 

[BourbonBalz]

yes and as i stated no one is dominant with a 1 and done in the playoffs. so did out 13 wins make us dominant? no.

We were certainly the most dominant team in the NFC East.

 

[ShiningStar]

We were certainly the most dominant team in the NFC East.

clearly, sweeping the Giants confirmed that.

 

[ShiningStar]

Yep, and we had two more than the Giants. It would've been three more had we played to win the last game.

yes, it was in our "would have" column along with any "morale" victories

 

[erod]

It's going to be a four-team bloodbath.

Four good teams with lots of holes.

 

[erod]

clearly, sweeping the Giants confirmed that.

Not to mention some very fortunate turns of events against Washington and Philly.

Dallas could have been 5-1 in the division, but could have easily been 0-6 as well.

 

[ShiningStar]

Not to mention some very fortunate turns of events against Washington and Philly.

Dallas could have been 5-1 in the division, but could have easily been 0-6 as well.

yes, none of those games did Dallas look dominant.

 

[BourbonBalz]

clearly, sweeping the Giants confirmed that.

So, in your genius analysis, two games with a total margin of 4 points tells the story better than the remaining 14 games??? Got it! That's really showing us.

 

[BourbonBalz]

Not to mention some very fortunate turns of events against Washington and Philly.

Dallas could have been 5-1 in the division, but could have easily been 0-6 as well.

Green Bay could've missed that last second field goal in the playoffs and we could've been playing to go to the Super Bowl too!!! We were a 13-3 team last year that most likely would've been 14-2 had we not sat our starters against Philly. We matched the best regular season record in team history. The 92, 93, and 95 teams also won several games they "could've" lost, but like last year's team, they didn't. You can what if crap to death. The facts are the team went 13-3 last year and had a great year. They were 6 points and a give away game away from being 16-0. Those are the FACTS, but you can spin them any way you want to.

 

[ShiningStar]

So, in your genius analysis, two games with a total margin of 4 points tells the story better than the remaining 14 games??? Got it! That's really showing us.

how is that margin of 4 points helping? no sport goes by margin or "morale" so there are no 4 points.

Giants swept us and went as far as us, does that scream dominant? how about since no east team has done it twice in a row? does that scream dominant? Dallas has not been dominant, thats fact, deal with it.

 

[ActualCowboysFan]

Not to mention some very fortunate turns of events against Washington and Philly.

Dallas could have been 5-1 in the division, but could have easily been 0-6 as well.

Not even in the realm of reality agenda pigeon

 

[BourbonBalz]

how is that margin of 4 points helping? no sport goes by margin or "morale" so there are no 4 points.

Giants swept us and went as far as us, does that scream dominant? how about since no east team has done it twice in a row? does that scream dominant? Dallas has not been dominant, thats fact, deal with it.

You seem to be an expert at being wrong. Congrats! By the way, no NFC East team has done what twice in a row? If you're hinting at what I think, that will prove quite a bit. How old are you? Let me guess, twenties.

 

[ShiningStar]

You seem to be an expert at being wrong. Congrats! By the way, no NFC East team has done what twice in a row? If you're hinting at what I think, that will prove quite a bit. How old are you? Let me guess, twenties.

wrong again, but its something you strive for. I know no NFCE east team has done it, thats why no NFCE team has really been dominant. Dallas as well. Stop soaking or wallowing in the culture of mediocrity and lets hope it ends. Dallas has been mediocre for a long time. Nothing from the team has screamed dominant in a long time. You might think 8-8 or 1 and done means dominant but the nfl disagrees. Also they still dont give wins for morale or losses if you dont win by more than 4.

 

[hornitosmonster]

Race between the Boys and the Gnats. The other two are door mats.

 

[Doomsday101]

http://sportdfw.com/2017/07/14/dallas-cowboys-toast-of-nfc-east/

"With Dallas Cowboys training camp approaching, it’s only fitting that we debate who wins the NFC East this season. Personal feelings aside, my thoughts are that Dallas will be crowned champs again. Let me explain why."

Let me know what you guys think of my latest piece .

Yeah I would say unbiased Dallas is the team to beat in the East. Simple reason we are the division champs.

 

[LocimusPrime]

Landon is a great player. The player we should have taken but the cowboys will win the East! Sorry homie. Go cowboys