TheHerd
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,543
- Reaction score
- 15,007
I guess it’s not obvious either way. But you did try a 59 yard FGIt’s early. Being down 3 vs 4 points at this point of the game isn’t a huge deal. More points will be scored.
I guess it’s not obvious either way. But you did try a 59 yard FGIt’s early. Being down 3 vs 4 points at this point of the game isn’t a huge deal. More points will be scored.
Baby steps for this team. Its back to basics today. Running the ball, being patient and grinding.I kinda thought we might go for 2.
$15M/year fullbackWe have to keep our Fullback happy.
I think the opposite. Points are at a premium for usIf the offense was humming, I would say go for 2 but not the way they been playing.
No need. Refs are told to call the game a certain way. It’s too obvious now. The refs aren’t bad. They’re just intentionally bad. If you’re a monopoly you can get away it. I counted four third down conversions gifted to the Raiders on dubious penalty calls. Of course, the obvious fumble taken away doesn’t even need to be mentioned. It was never called an incomplete pass.I will be writing a post tomorrow about the referees regardless of the outcome of this game
Idiot Lion sighting since Beagles won a few games
We’re gonna beat them to a pulp so beat it
Maybe he thought that mess with Z's head after two misses and wanted him to get a kick under his belt?
Raiders are pass happy someone should get a pick in the second half. Then we'll be back in the thick of it.
Maybe he thought that mess with Z's head after two misses and wanted him to get a kick under his belt?
You don't want to chase points. If you go for 2 and miss it you are chasing points. If they kick the field goal and get a stop and score a touchdown then you have the lead and you aren't chasing points.
And while they were down by 5. 4 point difference is no better than a 5 point difference.I think they should have gone for two while the momentum was there.