Cowboys workout DeForest Buckner, coming in for visit

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,256
Reaction score
18,644
Sounds like this one a little bit if Buckner goes at 4.

Frankly, I don't see the scheme fit with Buckner. He's really a 3-4 end.

At least with this draft, there's a good amount of talent from say 20 through the fourth round. 2009 was just awful all the way through. We may never see another draft that talent bereft across the board in a long time.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
And this is what we went 4-12 for? I hate to think I/We suffered through that pitiful season just to draft Buckner! :mad:

Just sad that we are even thinking about Buckner in the top 5............go watch his game against Stanford, his name was barely called all game and he was usually blown back 5 yards on some plays. He has the strength of a small baby.

Add to that his wonderlick score being in the Vince Young range and this pick starts looking very questionable to say the least.
 

Avery

The Dog that Saved Charleston
Messages
19,465
Reaction score
20,518
Nevermind. I now see you're thinking Wentz or Ramsey at 4. Another impactless cornerback with a top 5 pick.

I've always wondered if we were really using you to your fullest potential and today I realize that we are.

The last thing I ever wanted was to disappoint you, father.

Perhaps now you realize that there is no such thing as Wentz.
 

Gaede

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,165
Reaction score
14,127
Buckner's a good player but not a 4-3 end.

In a normal draft, he'd be in the top 10, maybe 9 or 10, off of his potential

His swim move is amazing and gets him immediate pressure. He hustles all over the field, unlike Bosa. Makes a ton of tackles-crushing RBs,

However, there are so many times he gets double teamed and then occasionally destroyed. Conklin abused him. And for a guy his size, he doesn't seem to bull rush very well.
 

dantheman41

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,064
Reaction score
545
Frankly, I don't see the scheme fit with Buckner. He's really a 3-4 end.

At least with this draft, there's a good amount of talent from say 20 through the fourth round. 2009 was just awful all the way through. We may never see another draft that talent bereft across the board in a long time.

Smokescreen in my opinion.... Be shocked if they drafted Buckner. Probably to make Chargers fearful so they draft him
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,604
Maybe they are not forcing the DL need pick. Maybe their draft board has Buckner in the top four along with Bosa. Could be Ramsey, Bosa, Tunsil and Buckner for all we know.

I like Bosa better because I believe he is the more complete player now, but Buckner has a lot of untapped talent because his technique needs work. Buckner's physically gifted, but he's just now starting to learn how to use those gifts.

It took the Cowboys two years to move Bob Lilly from defensive end to defensive tackle...if drafted, Marinelli won't mess around with that time line, and start him off inside. Could have similar growth tendencies as Bob Lilly if started inside.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,604
This is a Chris Canty look a like. I view as DT. DE's - need Shaq, Spence, Dodd or OSU kid. Like Shilique Calhoun, too.Need a serious upgrade to DL

There are some very strong smaller college players who can be had at defensive end, in rounds 2-4. And very strong indicators to boot. That usually translates to big hearts and mix it up from the start.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,604
If you have been following the Dallas Cowboys draft chatter then you already know that many analysts expect them to pick a defensive end in the first round.

Most mock drafts have Dallas selecting Ohio State’s Joey Bosa, but we recently learned that the Cowboys are not nearly as interested in him as these experts would have you believe. Instead, it looks like the Cowboys may have their eye on a different DE prospect: DeForest Buckner out of Oregon.

According to Rand Getlin of NFL Network, Buckner worked out for the Cowboys last week and they were impressed enough to invite him back for a second visit:


Multiple visits with prospects should not be dismissed. Chances are, the Dallas front office is very interested in Buckner and is seriously considering picking him in the first round.


Read more at http://cover32.com/2016/04/01/cowboys-looking-hard-oregon-prospect/#lZxHKFmrqDxrsRck.99
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
Buckner at 4?

Seriously?

Stanford made him their biotch all afternoon, the fact that our scouts watched that tape and think Buckner I top 5 is the most troubling
 

Simpleton

Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
52
Buckner at 4?

Seriously?

Stanford made him their biotch all afternoon, the fact that our scouts watched that tape and think Buckner I top 5 is the most troubling

Do you even know how to watch football?

First of all, let me just say that Buckner is not meant to be a 4-3 DE in the NFL where has to play on the edge in space against 310-320 lb OT's. He can do it at times, especially in run downs, but to me that is not his 4-3 position. In a 4-3 he is a gap-shooting 3 technique and since our scheme seemingly doesn't place much of a priority on size he can probably rotate in at 1 technique a bit too, as well as DE in run downs. But to me he is most valuable as an interior pass-rusher in a 4-3, you put him next to Crawford inside in nickel/dime and then rotate him between DE/3 technique/1 technique during other downs.

With that said, take a look at 5:21, 6:28, 8:29, 11:50 and 17:34 of the Stanford game.

At 5:21 he is quite literally triple teamed, holds his ground, gets penetration in the backfield and gets in on a stop for loss. Now, he wasn't the only reason the play was stopped for a loss but there is a reason the DL to his left was unblocked and gets penetration while the OG lined up across from that guy pulled to Buckner's side where he was being double and triple teamed yet Buckner stood his ground against 2-3 guys and still got into the backfield.

At 6:28 he puts Josh Garnett quite literally on his *** with a hump move and gets into the QB's lap in right around 3 seconds. The QB got the ball out just as Buckner got there but this is a top 50ish OG prospect who is known for his power that Buckner puts on the ground. The key here is that he shows this while matched up 1 on 1 with Garnett as an interior pass-rusher in a clear passing situation.

At 8:28, again matched up 1 on 1 with Garnett in a clear passing situation as an interior rusher and walks him all the way back into the QB's lap in right about 3 seconds to the point where Garnett is actually level with the QB as the QB throws the ball. Again, this is a top 50 type of OG prospect known for his power that Buckner walks right back into the QB's lap.

At 11:50, another obvious passing situation where he is matched up 1 on 1 with Garnett. He gets Garnett off balance with his off arm and then beats him to the outside for the sack. Got to the QB in just about 3 seconds just like the other instances but this time some of his teammates actually got a bit of pressure as opposed to the other times where the QB had a completely clean pocket aside from Buckner getting to his lap right as he releases.

At 17:38, another obvious passing situation lined up across from Garnett, beats him to the outside where the LT is waiting for him with nobody to block, pushes off the LT and gets to the QB in under 3 seconds, hits the QB right as he releases but the QB gets it off, mostly because there is no pressure from anybody but Buckner. He beats Garnett here to the point where Garnett gets so off balance that he almost falls over about 5 yards away from where Buckner actually ends up.

Keep in mind that this is a guy who very often was asked to 2-gap and take on double teams, often times on the edge which I don't think is ideal for him to begin with. You can't expect a guy to fight through double teams in a 2-gap assignment and get a bunch of quick penetration, that's not what they're asking him to do, especially when they have him doing that on the edge where he struggles to get around the corner to begin with. They also slant and stunt him alot in order to get the OL moving in one direction while bringing a DL or LB around behind him to the open area.

And this is a game against Stanford, one of the best teams in the country, on the road, against one of the best/most powerful running games in the country, and Buckner really shows off amazing strength as a pass rusher against probably their best/most powerful lineman in Garnett. The key is that you have to separate natural ability from what he is asked to do within a scheme. The fact that he gets held up on double teams on the edge in a 2 gap system shouldn't matter really if you're looking at him as an interior pass rusher who will only play DE in spots, primarily in run downs, especially when you should clearly be able to see the talent as an interior pass rusher. I think he relies a bit too much on his power when rushing from the inside but every DL coming out of college needs to work on their pass rush technique.

And of course there were plenty of times where he doesn't make much of an impact on a play, he gets beat by a double team or the play goes away from him but that is the case with every prospect. There are plenty of times where Bosa gets rooted out on a run play by a double team, is stoned in his pass rush or lets a RB run right by him. There are plenty of times where Ramsey lets an easy INT bounce right off his hands or gets beaten by a WR where he loses track of the ball in the air. The key is to see the ability these guys do have and know where their best fit is. If we draft Buckner with the plan to play him on the edge 90% of the time, that's a huge mistake, if we plan on playing him as a guy who can give you snaps at DE/3 tech/1 tech and then be used strictly on the interior in passing downs, then we'll have a player.

With all that said, we need to go QB at 4.
 

jjktkk

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,283
Reaction score
1,363
These other bizarre options are starting to make me come around to that idea too.

If Goff and Wentz are off the board, I would rather trade down in the mid teens, around the 14-20 range, and get Lynch.
 

Jstopper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,488
Reaction score
8,007
If Goff and Wentz are off the board, I would rather trade down in the mid teens, around the 14-20 range, and get Lynch.

That's the money plan there. I'm so totally against taking a qb at 4 Because that is a premium pick and we have limited picks. However if we trade back to the teens and pickup another 2nd, 3rd, or 4th now we're talking. Take lynch and load the team up with talent, wins all around.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,604
Do you even know how to watch football?

First of all, let me just say that Buckner is not meant to be a 4-3 DE in the NFL where has to play on the edge in space against 310-320 lb OT's. He can do it at times, especially in run downs, but to me that is not his 4-3 position. In a 4-3 he is a gap-shooting 3 technique and since our scheme seemingly doesn't place much of a priority on size he can probably rotate in at 1 technique a bit too, as well as DE in run downs. But to me he is most valuable as an interior pass-rusher in a 4-3, you put him next to Crawford inside in nickel/dime and then rotate him between DE/3 technique/1 technique during other downs.

With that said, take a look at 5:21, 6:28, 8:29, 11:50 and 17:34 of the Stanford game.

At 5:21 he is quite literally triple teamed, holds his ground, gets penetration in the backfield and gets in on a stop for loss. Now, he wasn't the only reason the play was stopped for a loss but there is a reason the DL to his left was unblocked and gets penetration while the OG lined up across from that guy pulled to Buckner's side where he was being double and triple teamed yet Buckner stood his ground against 2-3 guys and still got into the backfield.

At 6:28 he puts Josh Garnett quite literally on his *** with a hump move and gets into the QB's lap in right around 3 seconds. The QB got the ball out just as Buckner got there but this is a top 50ish OG prospect who is known for his power that Buckner puts on the ground. The key here is that he shows this while matched up 1 on 1 with Garnett as an interior pass-rusher in a clear passing situation.

At 8:28, again matched up 1 on 1 with Garnett in a clear passing situation as an interior rusher and walks him all the way back into the QB's lap in right about 3 seconds to the point where Garnett is actually level with the QB as the QB throws the ball. Again, this is a top 50 type of OG prospect known for his power that Buckner walks right back into the QB's lap.

At 11:50, another obvious passing situation where he is matched up 1 on 1 with Garnett. He gets Garnett off balance with his off arm and then beats him to the outside for the sack. Got to the QB in just about 3 seconds just like the other instances but this time some of his teammates actually got a bit of pressure as opposed to the other times where the QB had a completely clean pocket aside from Buckner getting to his lap right as he releases.

At 17:38, another obvious passing situation lined up across from Garnett, beats him to the outside where the LT is waiting for him with nobody to block, pushes off the LT and gets to the QB in under 3 seconds, hits the QB right as he releases but the QB gets it off, mostly because there is no pressure from anybody but Buckner. He beats Garnett here to the point where Garnett gets so off balance that he almost falls over about 5 yards away from where Buckner actually ends up.

Keep in mind that this is a guy who very often was asked to 2-gap and take on double teams, often times on the edge which I don't think is ideal for him to begin with. You can't expect a guy to fight through double teams in a 2-gap assignment and get a bunch of quick penetration, that's not what they're asking him to do, especially when they have him doing that on the edge where he struggles to get around the corner to begin with. They also slant and stunt him alot in order to get the OL moving in one direction while bringing a DL or LB around behind him to the open area.

And this is a game against Stanford, one of the best teams in the country, on the road, against one of the best/most powerful running games in the country, and Buckner really shows off amazing strength as a pass rusher against probably their best/most powerful lineman in Garnett. The key is that you have to separate natural ability from what he is asked to do within a scheme. The fact that he gets held up on double teams on the edge in a 2 gap system shouldn't matter really if you're looking at him as an interior pass rusher who will only play DE in spots, primarily in run downs, especially when you should clearly be able to see the talent as an interior pass rusher. I think he relies a bit too much on his power when rushing from the inside but every DL coming out of college needs to work on their pass rush technique.

And of course there were plenty of times where he doesn't make much of an impact on a play, he gets beat by a double team or the play goes away from him but that is the case with every prospect. There are plenty of times where Bosa gets rooted out on a run play by a double team, is stoned in his pass rush or lets a RB run right by him. There are plenty of times where Ramsey lets an easy INT bounce right off his hands or gets beaten by a WR where he loses track of the ball in the air. The key is to see the ability these guys do have and know where their best fit is. If we draft Buckner with the plan to play him on the edge 90% of the time, that's a huge mistake, if we plan on playing him as a guy who can give you snaps at DE/3 tech/1 tech and then be used strictly on the interior in passing downs, then we'll have a player.

With all that said, we need to go QB at 4.

Sounds like a tall road grader...and with a 'rook's' experience levels. He'll add both size and NFL power with increased strength from conditioning with the Cowboys.

Yea, put him in a boxing ring with that quarterback candidate and see who walks out...
 

jjktkk

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,283
Reaction score
1,363
That's the money plan there. I'm so totally against taking a qb at 4 Because that is a premium pick and we have limited picks. However if we trade back to the teens and pickup another 2nd, 3rd, or 4th now we're talking. Take lynch and load the team up with talent, wins all around.

The problem I have with the slotted players at 4, is other than Tunsil, they all have ?s. If the Cowboy's FO deems Wentz, or Goff a franchise QB, I have no problem with either at 4.
 
Top