News: Cowboys: Would A Reunion With Justin Durant Make Sense?

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,014
Reaction score
22,608
Cowboys: Would A Reunion With Justin Durant Make Sense?
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2016...would-a-reunion-with-justin-durant-make-sense





...When a team cuts someone on the first day of the offseason, it's usually a bad sign. Instead of waiting until the new NFL season officially begins on March 9th, the Atlanta Falcons decided to not even wait until then to release Justin Durant. Despite coming off his best season, Durant is a guy that didn't fit in Dan Quinn's long-term defensive plans. Durant hits the market at an interesting time, the same time where the Cowboys could potentially have a ton of questions at the linebacker position.

Rolando McClain's deal is officially up. And while many draft experts have predicted that UCLA's Myles Jack could be the team's first pick, the reality is that if McClain is brought back and the Cowboys have enough confidence in Anthony Hitchens and last year's fourth-round pick Damien Wilson, Dallas likely won't go the linebacker direction in the draft. Bringing back McClain is going to be a storyline to follow as free agency nears.

On one hand, the Cowboys got a ton out of McClain over the past two years. Dallas basically gave McClain a "prove-it" type of deal. He flashed his first-round potential at times, but he also looked extremely lost in some games as well. But because the Cowboys gave McClain a chance when no one else really would, I would imagine the 26-year-old would give the Cowboys the upper-hand in terms of his free agency suitors this offseason. But what happens exactly if the Cowboys do not bring back McClain and they do not have confidence in Hitchens or Wilson taking on bigger roles? Well the answer to that question could be bringing back a familiar face in Durant.

With the Falcons for just one season, Durant registered 82 tackles. At 30 years old, Durant is a guy who has been productive in the games he's played in. Because of his age, he won't command that much money in free agency, a bonus for Dallas, especially if they'd like to sign a blue-chip cornerback in free agency.

The problem with Durant is, and has always been, his health. In two seasons with the Cowboys, Durant played in just 16 games. Last year with the Falcons, he managed to play in 13 games. But in Dallas, Durant's role wouldn't be a starting one. Instead, it would be one where he would play in some sub-packages, mainly in packages that focus on shutting down the opposition in the running game. Durant is also a seasoned guy who would be able to help the progression of both Hitchens and Wilson.

Dallas continually finds good, cheap gets in free agency. If the Cowboys want some insurance at the linebacker positions and they don't want to use their high draft pick on a linebacker, bringing back Durant wouldn't be that bad of an idea. Durant wouldn't cost all that much and he could potentially be a guy who's a stopgap solution until the Cowboys can fully groom a guy like Wilson or even another linebacker prospect that they take at some point in the draft.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,562
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
history shows, health will always be an issue with Justin.

Agreed. And I think this team has relied on - and gotten burned by - too many players with poor injury histories.

They put all of their eggs in Romo's basket to remain healthy and lost

They counted on big things from Lance Dunbar despite him always being hurt, wrong again.

They went into the season expecting a big contribution from Terrell McClain. Strike three!

And, while I love the player, we all know about Sean Lee's injury situation.

And while I'm not advocating getting rid of great players in Lee or Romo, I think the team would be better off moving on from players with history of injury, or at the very least making sure they have a backup plan for if and when they are hurt.
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
Yes, if he can still run well.

Mainly because we can put him at the WILL or the MIKE (or the SAM).

I would prefer Hitchens at the WILL if when Lee gets hurt, again. But, with Cowboys LB's, there's no guarantee that both Lee and Hitchens don't get injured. And I would prefer him as a backup to the starting MIKE.




YR
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,562
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
How is getting a dominant defensive player at 4 a bad thing? Where else will we get one?

When you have an opportunity to get a franchise quarterback and you won't again for several years?

You tell me what's harder to come by?
 

DeaconMoss

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,392
Reaction score
7,302
28fd19e8-ca03-457c-a02e-d46290d66c33.jpg
 

Silver N Blue

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,342
Reaction score
8,982
Nah I tend to agree with the board yesterday in the draft zone how many WLB's does this team need. Put me in with the boat Pic crowd on this one.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,009
Reaction score
37,150
I like it. Durant + Lee = one full time LB.

I agree.

Funny thing is Durant was the first linebacker we tried to re-sign last season. After we failed to do that, we dabbled with re-signing Carter and then re-signed McClain.

I think it's possible McClain could still return on another one-year deal, but he is unreliable for a different reason than Durant. Nothing wrong with having both along with Hitchens, Gachkar and Wilson.

If we draft someone who is able to knock one of those guys off the roster, so be it. However, I believe McClain will be a late signing again, so he might just get dropped from the plans entirely if we draft an LB early enough.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,009
Reaction score
37,150
DeMarcus Ware? DeMarco Murray? Now Justin Durant? What is it with fans wanting to bring back players we got rid of? :huh:

I think it's more about playing different roles. We need some proven players, but we need them to play a part rather than relying on them to be the man.

If we want Ware as a full-time starting, star end if he's released, then that's not very smart. As a part-timer supplementing our two young ends, he would be a good pickup. Of course, the money paid to him would have to reflect that role.

Murray would probably be a little different because he could be the starter over McFadden. However, McFadden's performance last year shows that the two could actually be platooned. Again, it would have to be a bargain deal based on his play last year. (I can't see the Eagles releasing Murray, though, so I think this one is a pipe dream.)

Durant would supplement the LB corps, giving us a vet player to spot play and fill in the gaps if one of the starters is not available. Again, I think it would be unwise to bring him in and expect him to be a full-time starter.
 
Top