Jimz31
The Sarcastic One
- Messages
- 14,388
- Reaction score
- 231
Aree you serious? I wouldn't be surprised if the "real" reason we struggled yesterday is because the oppositon could just use one guy to defend each receiver...T.O. opened our offense up whether you want to realize it or not.
Romo will have to struggle more now than ever to find an open man....any open man.
Am I saying we shouldn't have let him go? No.
But let's not be stupid here, the guy occupied more of the defense than anyone else did.
The guy produced....no doubt about it.....just like Chucky said....give me three of him!
You could compare his stats to EVERY other team the way that you are and of course you will come away looking as if it were a good trade the way you are looking at it...I'll guarantee that the Raiders end up tonight with more yards passing then what TO had....big deal. Has it occured to you that maybe the reason why the game was so close was because the Pats haqd to account two guys for TO?.......Evidently not.
Romo will have to struggle more now than ever to find an open man....any open man.
Am I saying we shouldn't have let him go? No.
But let's not be stupid here, the guy occupied more of the defense than anyone else did.
The guy produced....no doubt about it.....just like Chucky said....give me three of him!
You could compare his stats to EVERY other team the way that you are and of course you will come away looking as if it were a good trade the way you are looking at it...I'll guarantee that the Raiders end up tonight with more yards passing then what TO had....big deal. Has it occured to you that maybe the reason why the game was so close was because the Pats haqd to account two guys for TO?.......Evidently not.