Twitter: Dak against playoff teams

This is a grandpa here using terms like jock sniffer. You can’t be serious.
Oh look, One of my favorite jesters from the court of King yobwocs and Queen Rockport. The same jester who was calling someone an "ageist" just recently. By the way, I'm not interested so look elsewhere to satisfy your fantasies of older men. Weirdo.

ageist
/ˈājəst/
Ageist describes actions, attitudes, or policies that discriminate against, stereotype, or show prejudice toward individuals based primarily on their age.
 
I'm not gonna answer you because your claims are false. I had Yobwocs' weekly insights series last year, but it was short lived because people were just gonna attack me about Dak when we're losing, even if I never mentioned Dak at all in any of those posts.... they see my name and make it about Dak.

The offseason I post mainly Dak stuff because that's where all the arguments are. I don't like prediction threads or roster threads, and I have absolutely no idea if Malacai Lawrence is gonna be a beast.
Ok, I can respect that I guess. It's an ape cop out, but I respect that.
 
It’s 2 or 3 people lol. The same amount of people that will jump down on you for saying Dak is elite or a good qb….lets not pretend like it’s one sided. I’m a Dak fan and I’ve been attacked by pro and anti Dak people lol. This is a Cowboys fan forum. There are gonna aggressive fans of this team.

There is a difference between calling Dak a good QB and calling him an Elite quarterback, in terms of making an argument rational. Logically, I would say there is more proof required to proves someone is elite versus being good, and people would be less skeptical if the claim was just good. Ironically, Dak could settle the question himself by having a nice playoff run. I liked Romo for instance as the quarterback, but I would find it absurd for someone to call him elite. By what each has achieved in their career, the highest evaluation that would seem reasonable to claim, is to say they are good. Elite seems absurd without the person claiming it backing it up with convincing evidence, which none has done to overcome the 2-5 record.
 
lmao...when you get called out by Rockport, you know the truth is coming out. You are a Cowboy fan only because of Dak, and that is a fact, jack!
How embarrassing.
So rock only lies when he doesn’t agree with you. Otherwise you’re all over his junk. I don’t think he’s interested in you, find your boyfriend somewhere else.
 
Yup.... Dak haters aren't gonna rule this site as far as I'm concerned. There has to be people willing to make this both sided, so yes I would say I'm the leader of the Ape revolt, name is Caesar.
All Dak has to do to get rid of haters is prove them wrong and perform in the playoffs. Even is the rest of the team sucks, if someone is truly elite, you should still be able to see it in their play in the playoffs, and see wow, the Cowboys played poorly but this player play was great. It's not like people can't see when it isn't a players fault they lost a big game despite the lack of talent around him. The best I've seen of Dak in the playoffs was in his first year here.
 
Oh look, One of my favorite jesters from the court of King yobwocs and Queen Rockport. The same jester who was calling someone an "ageist" just recently. By the way, I'm not interested so look elsewhere to satisfy your fantasies of older men. Weirdo.

ageist
/ˈājəst/
Ageist describes actions, attitudes, or policies that discriminate against, stereotype, or show prejudice toward individuals based primarily on their age.
So you posted the definition and still don’t understand lol….my grandpas never used terms like lock sniffers. It’s pathetic.
 
There is a difference between calling Dak a good QB and calling him an Elite quarterback, in terms of making an argument rational. Logically, I would say there is more proof required to proves someone is elite versus being good, and people would be less skeptical if the claim was just good. Ironically, Dak could settle the question himself by having a nice playoff run. I liked Romo for instance as the quarterback, but I would find it absurd for someone to call him elite. By what each has achieved in their career, the highest evaluation that would seem reasonable to claim, is to say they are good. Elite seems absurd without the person claiming it backing it up with convincing evidence, which none has done to overcome the 2-5 record.
I just said elite. I don’t see many people making that argument. At the end of the day Dak is a good qb who is 2-5 in the playoffs. Why that’s controversial I don’t know….
 
I just said elite. I don’t see many people making that argument. At the end of the day Dak is a good qb who is 2-5 in the playoffs. Why that’s controversial I don’t know….
People are fed up with the mediocrity. A decade with one quarterback and mediocrity and now a decade with another quarterback with the same amount of mediocrity. We all know Jerry is the number 1 problem, but people are less willing to give the same amount of time of mediocrity to the 2nd quarterback, and not even get to a championship Game, meanwhile our hated rival is willing to move on from quarterbacks, proving that sometimes it is better to move on than to keep doing the same thing over and over again for over two decades of mediocrity.
 
People are fed up with the mediocrity. A decade with one quarterback and mediocrity and now a decade with another quarterback with the same amount of mediocrity. We all know Jerry is the number 1 problem, but people are less willing to give the same amount of time of mediocrity to the 2nd quarterback, and not even get to a championship Game, meanwhile our hated rival is willing to move on from quarterbacks, proving that sometimes it is better to move on than to keep doing the same thing over and over again for over two decades of mediocrity.
This is why I wouldn't have hesitated to sign Brady the year he took the Bucs to a SB title. That could have been us. Yeah, Brady was done after that, but it would have been worth it for that one SB.
 
People are fed up with the mediocrity. A decade with one quarterback and mediocrity and now a decade with another quarterback with the same amount of mediocrity. We all know Jerry is the number 1 problem, but people are less willing to give the same amount of time of mediocrity to the 2nd quarterback, and not even get to a championship Game, meanwhile our hated rival is willing to move on from quarterbacks, proving that sometimes it is better to move on than to keep doing the same thing over and over again for over two decades of mediocrity.
It’s been 30 years of mediocrity. Dak is 32. That’s how long it’s been… you can’t be too tired iof mediocrity when Jerry and his son run the team. What’s that plan to wait out him and his son?
 
This is why I wouldn't have hesitated to sign Brady the year he took the Bucs to a SB title. That could have been us. Yeah, Brady was done after that, but it would have been worth it for that one SB.
Oh boy. Posts like these remind me of why it’s been 30 years and why Jerry stays GM…you have no idea what it takes to win it you think we had a championship team. They had Ngata we had Antawn Woods starting for us. Just ridiculous.
 
he was never coming.... he was never interested in an average Cowboys roster.
Yep, Brady was smart going to a Super Bowl ready team. But I guess to some it was all him. He played all the offensive positions and some of the defensive ones as well.
 
All Dak has to do to get rid of haters is prove them wrong and perform in the playoffs. Even is the rest of the team sucks, if someone is truly elite, you should still be able to see it in their play in the playoffs, and see wow, the Cowboys played poorly but this player play was great. It's not like people can't see when it isn't a players fault they lost a big game despite the lack of talent around him. The best I've seen of Dak in the playoffs was in his first year here.

I was with you until you said "prove them wrong, even if the rest of the team sucks".

If thats the case, why do Matthew Stafford get so many excuses for his time in Detroit?

Patrick Mahomes is the best quarterback in football and is as elite as they come.... but he couldn't even make it to the playoffs because the rest of his team sucks.

I understand somewhat of where you coming from, but that logic would never apply here for the Cowboys. No matter how we lose or who was at fault. When the Cowboys lose, some people will blame the quarterback no matter how well he played or if he played bad.

Look how many people attach our 7-9-1 record from last year to the offense despite having a top 4 offense.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,371
Messages
14,533,598
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top