Dak Prescott By Offensive Personnel in 2016

[Blackspider214]

Credit to:
https://twitter.com/Marcus_Mosher

 

[NeonDeion21]

When I was charting this, it was odd to see how cautious Prescott was out of 12 personnel. Didn't hit any big plays down the field out of 12.

 

[LocimusPrime]

Woah look at that 11 personnel package. That's the bread and butter or for the ladies it's naan bread and humus

 

[T-RO]

I think this needs a legend to explain for those of us that forget the personnel numbering scheme.

The count is simple...the first number is the count of running backs...the second number is the number of tight ends.

Spelling it out with examples...


0 RB packages:
00... five WR
01... 4 WR 1 TE
02...3 WR, 2 TE

Other Receiver-heavy packages
10...4 WR, 1 RB
11... 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB

Heavier Packages:
12 = 2 WR, 2 TE, 1 RB
13= 1 RB, 3 TE, 1 WR

You don't see two Running backs in the backfield in the NFL anymore, but...
21 = 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 RB
22= 1 WR, 2 RB, 2 TE

 

[jday]

When I was charting this, it was odd to see how cautious Prescott was out of 12 personnel. Didn't hit any big plays down the field out of 12.

Excellent info here Neon, Thanks.

Here's what I found surprising: Not one instance of the 10 personnel grouping? Since drafting Switzer, I have thought they may offer more of this personnel grouping in 2017, but I honestly had no idea that if they do, it will be the first time in at least over a year.

That's amazing to me, because it would seem that the 10 would be a personnel grouping Dak & Zeke could thrive in...if I'm not mistaken, Mississippi State used the 10 personnel quite a bit, but I certainly could be wrong...I haven't charted it as you have here.

But am I the only that thinks the 10 could be a prominent addition to their attack this year?