Dak Prescott ranked 7th on the Ringer's QB rankings ahead of Lamar, Burrow

[JoeKing]

whar is your problem? Man chill out. There is nothing to say, I can’t help you if you can’t understand it.
I guess you just want to argue. I am done with this.

It's a legit question. You said rankings go out the window after this week and then said they would be interesting. How can both things be true at the same time? When you continue to refuse to explain this, it tells me you were just talking crap. It should be easy enough to answer but you don't. What is your problem?

 

[jnday]

No issue here at all. I’ve always felt dak falls somewhere in that 7-12 range.

There is an issue of Dak being ahead of Burrows or Stafford.

 

[Zekeats]

No issue here at all. I’ve always felt dak falls somewhere in that 7-12 range.

5-10 when he plays the east
25-32 when he plays anyone else

 

[Bob-Lillys-War]

Cokehead rankings .

 

[bonafidebanter]

I wonder how the Rams feel after their QB, who led the league in INTs last year, stunk it up against the Bills. He had 186 yds and 3 picks before garbage time. Asking for a friend.

 

[Bob-Lillys-War]

lmao ...

ahead of Burrow.

 

[GINeric]

There is an issue of Dak being ahead of Burrows or Stafford.

Stafford is 8 - 68 vs winning teams.... Burrows is special, but I'd pick Dak over Stafford any day.

 

[kskboys]

Stafford is 8 - 68 vs winning teams.... Burrows is special, but I'd pick Dak over Stafford any day.

WL record of a player coming from the DET's of the league is irrelevant.

Dak and Stafford are very close. Putting one ahead of the other is fine, doesn't matter which. Goes more to what type O you're running.

 

[GINeric]

There is an issue of Dak being ahead of Burrows or Stafford.

Dak shouldn't be ahead of Burrows.... but he DEFINITELY should be ahead of Stafford. Not by much, but definitely ahead of him.

 

[GINeric]

WL record of a player coming from the DET's of the league is irrelevant.

Dak and Stafford are very close. Putting one ahead of the other is fine, doesn't matter which. Goes more to what type O you're running.

WL record of a player coming from the DET's of the league is irrelevant.

Dak and Stafford are very close. Putting one ahead of the other is fine, doesn't matter which. Goes more to what type O you're running.

All due respect to you personally, but..... NAHHHH. Im not even hearing that first part. Because I was told by a few people here that a great quarterback is supposed to elevate the players around him. They said, a bad o-line, bad personnel moves, and subpar coaching CAN NOT be used as an excuse for a quarterback.....

Those same people said that Stafford is a great quarterback.

So we're throwing that whole "Detroit" excuse out the window. If he's great then he should have been able to elevate that Lions offense. Nah, those aren't valid excuses. There is no excuse why a great quarterback would have played like Stafford played tonight. Thats what people are calling great quarterbacking these days??

 

[Cowboysheelsreds053]

Not read the first page on this thread but would be highly disappointed if the 4 Horsemen on Dak didn’t appear in it.

 

[Pass2Run]

I have to agree with Sharpe on Dak not being the 7th best quarterback but he's definitely top ten. Its ironic that everything Sharpe said was what he thought opposed to how Skip pulled out proof of production, not just talk. QBR is heavily respected around the league and the numbers don't lie. But I don't think Dak's the seventh best.

Now Sharpe is a self admitted Cowboys hater and Skip is a Cowboys homer to the core, and Shannon Sharpe always pull out stat sheets when talking about LeBron and other athletes in sports.... but I notice how Sharpe conveniently ignore the paperwork when talking about Dak. How do you use paperwork when talking about other athletes and other quarterbacks, but leave it out for the Dak conversations??? Hmmm....

Now what really confused me when Sharpe on one hand said Dak isn't top 10.... but then he followed that up with Dak has earned and deserves his money and was one of the biggest analysts lobbying for Dak to get paid.... he just admitted that on the video, but.... huh?? Wait what???

I respect Sharpe's hate for the Cowboys but I don't put too much stock into his sports IQ for this reason.... this is the same dude that said LeBron was better than Jordan and Kobe wasn't a top 10 player all time in his top 10 list.

Yeah... nah... credibility???

If he were to utilize the stat sheet to make his argument, that would bolster his stance, because Dak's record against winning teams is pretty damning.

Ahead of Burrow, Staford, and Murray? Wo.

We all talk about Mike Fisher, mostly because of his tone towards fans. But at least he has legitimate insight at times that offers some sort of value.

What does Skip Bayless ever offer in terms of Cowboy news that holds real value?

I'll wait for the answer with bated breath. :/

 

[Pass2Run]

Stafford throws a pretty ball and makes good decisions and money throws when it counts. Kupp plays the game the right way. Runs every route like its his last. Even when he is not the expected receiver. They are both helped by a creative play caller. With that being said, both are way better than what Dallas has on the roster.

The other thing Stafford has that Dak doesn't have other than a quicker release is an offensive unit with players who're all on the same page, with the same goal, and certain about the strategy to execute the next play. They look relaxed out there and cohesive.

They got their ***** handed to them. But I'm going to say it right now. The Bills are the real deal this year. I suspect they'll still be in the mix when it comes down to the final four.