Dak vs Trubisky Playoffs

Is this a serious question?

Trubisky has 2800 yards passing, and a 1/3 of the experience Dak has.

If you were unlucky enough to choose from 1 of the 2, you definitely have to go with Dak.

Trubisky is pretty garbage from the games I've watched, but has absolutely stellar coaching to compensate. We don't have that luxury.
 
Is this a serious question?

Trubisky has 2800 yards passing, and a 1/3 of the experience Dak has.

If you were unlucky enough to choose from 1 of the 2, you definitely have to go with Dak.

Trubisky is pretty garbage from the games I've watched, but has absolutely stellar coaching to compensate. We don't have that luxury.

Really, garbage? From the games I seen, he looked pretty good. Except that Rams game, coming off his injury. But then again, Goff threw 4 picks that game. Well he did play bad in that NY game too. But until his shoulder Injury he was playing pretty good.

Give me Trubisky. Much more upside for the long haul.

For the playoffs, I think it is more on the defense than the QB's. Trubisky will do better against our D than Dak will against their D.
Why? because their D creates turnovers, ours does not. Dak will throw picks and fumble when he gets sacked 10 times. Because he holds onto the ball. Trubisky seems to get rid of it.
 
Really, garbage? From the games I seen, he looked pretty good. Except that Rams game, coming off his injury. But then again, Goff threw 4 picks that game. Well he did play bad in that NY game too. But until his shoulder Injury he was playing pretty good.

Give me Trubisky. Much more upside for the long haul.

For the playoffs, I think it is more on the defense than the QB's. Trubisky will do better against our D than Dak will against their D.
Why? because their D creates turnovers, ours does not. Dak will throw picks and fumble when he gets sacked 10 times. Because he holds onto the ball. Trubisky seems to get rid of it.

Agreed 100%
 
Is this a serious question?

Trubisky has 2800 yards passing, and a 1/3 of the experience Dak has.

If you were unlucky enough to choose from 1 of the 2, you definitely have to go with Dak.

Trubisky is pretty garbage from the games I've watched, but has absolutely stellar coaching to compensate. We don't have that luxury.

FWIW

Trubisky average is 234 yards a game with 23 TDs(+3 rushing), 12 INTs, 5 fumbles
Prescott is at 238 yards a game with 17 TDs(+5 rushing), 8 INTs, 12 fumbles

I'm not saying I'll take Mitchell over Dak AINEC, but they are pretty close stat wise.
 
Dak has at least proven he is clutch in some situations. What has Trubisky proved? Some want to say that the Cowboys win because of the Defense, when the same could be said for the Bears. Especially in the game against the Rams were Trubisky threw INTs.
 
We can have this debate with the other 31 starting qbs in the league, and Dak should lose 90% of them...


For the sake of this thread-Trubisky
I wouldn't say 90 percent of them but I would easily take Trubisky over Dak. Had we gotten Trubisky instead of Dak I would have you Switzer because they had chemistry and gives him a target he knows and is comfortable with.
 
Is this a serious question?

Trubisky has 2800 yards passing, and a 1/3 of the experience Dak has.

If you were unlucky enough to choose from 1 of the 2, you definitely have to go with Dak.

Trubisky is pretty garbage from the games I've watched, but has absolutely stellar coaching to compensate. We don't have that luxury.

So you’ve looked at yardage but what about the rest of the stats?

A quick glance shows me 23/12 TD/INT, 94.1 rating, 64.9%, for a guy that’s played the equivalent of 1.5 seasons (24 games).
 
I'll take Dak .....hes a winner man( Right Zeke ?) :eek:....can't throw or do anything else required by a NFL QB properly but he's a nice guy so Dak all the way baby!!!

Dak Prescott where passing TD are a luxury item...GO DAK GO....
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,658
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top