Dak wasn't that good last night **merged**

[LocimusPrime]

Bro, this thread is a circus LMAO

It's kinda gangsta

 

[Philmonroe]

ah, so you don't know about the season because it hasn't played out, but Dak's career has already played out and you know about that right?

2 things:

1. We are definitely NOT going to the SB this year
2. Dak has a long way to go as QB

Who said I know about his career? More made up bs from you. I'm speaking on what I have in front of me.

 

[Gator88]

Wow!!! No offensive line pro bowlers are worthless? Ok. So why is it such a topic in reference to Dak’s team? I find this bs line of thinking very hypocritical. You guys will say anything to berate Dak and uplift Romo. This is crazy.

No, pro bowl offensive lineman aren't worthless. Pro bowls are worthless in terms of measuring how good offensive lineman are.

 

[Philmonroe]

You said: "Basically you're scarred to be without Dak because you don't know the future good or bad? Thanks for being a football coward."

If you preface the coward comment with "you're" and "you", it appears clearly to be commenting about the person, not the decision.

But we'll accept your explanation on it, next time it would help if you would say you're talking about the decision, not the person, it's too easily interpreted as a personal attack...

I told you what I meant and if you want to assume or still make up your own version of,what I'm saying esp online where things can get mixed up all the time go ahead. Next time it would help if you just ask exactly what I meant instead of assuming the worst because that's how you'd do it.

 

[Supercowboy1986]

I’d say it’s more spiritually gangsta

It's kinda gangsta

 

[keysersoze]

No, pro bowl offensive lineman aren't worthless. Pro bowls are worthless in terms of measuring how good offensive lineman are.

You have a valid point. But why are the Pro Bowl linemen on our team always over emphasized when speaking about the players Dak has around him?We always hear about Dak has all pro talent on his Oline and all the other bs. But it’s all minimized when all pro linemen Romo played with are brought up.
If it’s worthless when they were with Romo then the same applies to Dak. Why the double standards?

 

[Cap12]

You have a valid point. But why are the Pro Bowl linemen on our team always over emphasized when speaking about the players Dak has around him?We always hear about Dak has all pro talent on his Oline and all the other bs. But it’s all minimized when all pro linemen Romo played with are brought up.
If it’s worthless when they were with Romo then the same applies to Dak. Why the double standards?

Probably because the probowlers on the Oline were aging when Romo took over in 2006 and were gone by 2010 (and those lines after were awful until Fredirck got drafted in 2013). Dak has had 3 probowlers in their in their prime in his first season. Romo never had 3 Probowl linemen at the same time until 2014. As good as Romo's line were for a few years, none of them matched up to 2016's line. Romo also proved he could play through adversity and injuries to his line even early in his career. The bottom line is Dak had better line talent. He has played with 3 legitimate First Team All-Pros (Smith Martin and Fredrick) on the line over the course of his career, where Romo only 1 full season with 2 First team All-Pro players on the line (Smith and Martin in 2014). So basically, people are saying that Romo had less talent to work with than Dak on the OL.

 

[keysersoze]

Probably because the probowlers on the Oline were aging when Romo took over in 2006 and were gone by 2010 (and those lines after were awful until Fredirck got drafted in 2013). Dak has had 3 probowlers in their in their prime in his first season. Romo never had 3 Probowl linemen at the same time until 2014. As good as Romo's line were for a few years, none of them matched up to 2016's line. Romo also proved he could play through adversity and injuries to his line even early in his career. The bottom line is Dak had better line talent. He has played with 3 legitimate First Team All-Pros (Smith Martin and Fredrick) on the line over the course of his career, where Romo only 1 full season with 2 First team All-Pro players on the line (Smith and Martin in 2014). So basically, people are saying that Romo had less talent to work with than Dak on the OL.

That’s a bs excuse. Romo had TO, and Witten in their primes. Along with Terry Glenn. Romo hasn’t had a receiving core anywhere near that. Plus Romo started out with superior coaching than Dak has. All the talk of Dak vs Romo is null and void. Romo sat on the bench and on practice squads until ready. Dak had to go directly into battle.
TO and company boosted Romo’s early stats with major RAC. Terrell Owens helped Romo early on and was the main one to lobby for Romo to start over Bledsoe because Bledsoe and Parcells conspired to keep TO minimized and to target Glenn more because of the history between Glenn, Bledsoe and Parcells. Tuna never wanted TO to begin with. Romo either for that matter.
Can you honestly say what difference a young TO and Witten would do for Dak right now? I’m sure things would look much different with a Hall of Fame WR and Hall of Fame TE. Romo started his career with such a supporting cast. Dak hasn’t been as fortunate.

 

[keysersoze]

What really gets me is how everyone who hates Dak is Pro Romo. Which is fine. Romo retired a Cowboy. But to sit here bashing Dak in favor of Romo is ridiculous. People forget how Romo started here. A practice squad quarterback turned 3rd stringer, turned 2nd stringer, turned starter. It was a process. He didn’t come into the league on an active roster. He didn’t come in as a rookie and deliver us into the postseason. And many also conveniently forget that when he became the starter he didn’t inherit a lousy team that he miraculously uplifted. He came into a pretty damned good situation himself. Since y’all love to talk about the team Dak inherited. How many quarterbacks start off their actual playing careers wit not one, but TWO surefire Hall Of Famers as his main receiving threats? Don’t worry. I’ll wait for the answer.
You all talk **** about Dak having the Oline and Zeke, but Romo had a good Oline and proven pass catchers. Not to mention he had decent running backs as well. The hypocrisy and biases against Dak are plain to see. Some of you guys need to break away from the bs you were raised to believe and embrace reality. Dak’s book is far from written and we shall see if he sinks or swims soon enough.
Hey!! You same hypocrites gave Romo damn near a decade with only several wild card wins to show.
Let’s just support our young quarterback in the same fashion since we are all SUPPOSED TO BE COWBOYS FANS
Or is that just too much civility to ask of you?

 

[jnday]

ah, so you don't know about the season because it hasn't played out, but Dak's career has already played out and you know about that right?

2 things:

1. We are definitely NOT going to the SB this year
2. Dak has a long way to go as QB

Dallas will not go to the Super Bowl with Dak as the starting QB. Our standards have dropped so low that fans are now happy with a 200 yard passing game. Dak simply does not have the natural talent to lead this team. Trading up and drafting the best QB in next year’s draft would be the best possible move that that Dallas could make to move this team into a regular playoff contender.

 

[Cap12]

Probably because the probowlers on the Oline were aging when Romo took over in 2006 and were gone by 2010 (and those lines after were awful until Fredirck got drafted in 2013). Dak has had 3 probowlers in their in their prime in his first season. Romo never had 3 Probowl linemen at the same time until 2014. As good as Romo's line were for a few years, none of them matched up to 2016's line. Romo also proved he could play through adversity and injuries to his line even early in his career. The bottom line is Dak had better line talent. He has played with 3 legitimate First Team All-Pros (Smith Martin and Fredrick) on the line over the course of his career, where Romo only 1 full season with 2 First team All-Pro players on the line (Smith and Martin in 2014). So basically, people are saying that Romo had less talent to work with than Dak on the OL.

That’s a bs excuse. Romo had TO, and Witten in their primes. Along with Terry Glenn. Romo hasn’t had a receiving core anywhere near that. Plus Romo started out with superior coaching than Dak has. All the talk of Dak vs Romo is null and void. Romo sat on the bench and on practice squads until ready. Dak had to go directly into battle.
TO and company boosted Romo’s early stats with major RAC. Terrell Owens helped Romo early on and was the main one to lobby for Romo to start over Bledsoe because Bledsoe and Parcells conspired to keep TO minimized and to target Glenn more because of the history between Glenn, Bledsoe and Parcells. Tuna never wanted TO to begin with. Romo either for that matter.
Can you honestly say what difference a young TO and Witten would do for Dak right now? I’m sure things would look much different with a Hall of Fame WR and Hall of Fame TE. Romo started his career with such a supporting cast. Dak hasn’t been as fortunate.

When did I say anythig about WR or TE talent? I just commented on the Oline per what you wrote, so don't lump me into any great anti-Dak conspiracy. As far as TO, as great a player as he was, he never had anything good to say about his QBs when he finally left the team (Garcia, McNabb, Romo etc.) Yeah, it was all their fault. I'm sure T.O would be complaing about Dak too and he might actually have a reason. Those other QBs were more developed when they played with TO, so he might actually have an excuse with Dak.

 

[G2]

Probably because the probowlers on the Oline were aging when Romo took over in 2006 and were gone by 2010 (and those lines after were awful until Fredirck got drafted in 2013). Dak has had 3 probowlers in their in their prime in his first season. Romo never had 3 Probowl linemen at the same time until 2014. As good as Romo's line were for a few years, none of them matched up to 2016's line. Romo also proved he could play through adversity and injuries to his line even early in his career. The bottom line is Dak had better line talent. He has played with 3 legitimate First Team All-Pros (Smith Martin and Fredrick) on the line over the course of his career, where Romo only 1 full season with 2 First team All-Pro players on the line (Smith and Martin in 2014). So basically, people are saying that Romo had less talent to work with than Dak on the OL.

Romo had plenty of opportunities to either go to the playoffs or go further. Including 2006.

 

[keysersoze]

Romo had plenty of opportunities to either go to the playoffs or go further. Including 2006.

Yea. But according to the Dak Haters, Romo uplifted a team of bums including TO and Witten.

 

[G2]

Yea. But according to the Dak Haters, Romo uplifted a team of bums including TO and Witten.

I wish Prescott had TO, Witten (2 HOFers) and Bryant in their prime.

 

[Cap12]

Yeah, but he and the team either melted down (like the Favre game against the Vikes, which was not all on Romo) or more often, got snake-bitten (the 2014 Packers game). Say what you want about Romo, but I promise you that the team or his body (and sometimes it was directly related to the team when he was getting his clock cleaned) let him down more often than his play on the field did. When things were going well for #9, nobody could spin a prettier pass or had better touch.

 

[Cap12]

I wish Prescott had TO, Witten (2 HOFers) and Bryant in their prime.

The 2016 was the best team that the Cowboys fielded this millennium. It was built to take Tony to the promise land and Dak took it for a nice ride himself.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Who said I know about his career? More made up bs from you. I'm speaking on what I have in front of me.

Dallas will not go to the Super Bowl with Dak as the starting QB. Our standards have dropped so low that fans are now happy with a 200 yard passing game. Dak simply does not have the natural talent to lead this team. Trading up and drafting the best QB in next year’s draft would be the best possible move that that Dallas could make to move this team into a regular playoff contender.

You mean like Romo?

 

[keysersoze]

When did I say anythig about WR or TE talent? I just commented on the Oline per what you wrote, so don't lump me into any great anti-Dak conspiracy. As far as TO, as great a player as he was, he never had anything good to say about his QBs when he finally left the team (Garcia, McNabb, Romo etc.) Yeah, it was all their fault. I'm sure T.O would be complaing about Dak too and he might actually have a reason. Those other QBs were more developed when they played with TO, so he might actually have an excuse with Dak.

You didn’t have to say it. You are still blindly saying that Dak has a better team than Romo ever had. And that’s a damned lie. Romo came aboard with all the tools in place but didn’t deliver. Simple as that!!! Romo had one of the best WRs and one the best TEs in NFL HISTORY and still came up short. All Dak has is Zeke. Come on man!!! You guys are plain hypocritical and biased against Dak. There’s no other reason for this blasphemy.

 

[keysersoze]

The 2016 was the best team that the Cowboys fielded this millennium. It was built to take Tony to the promise land and Dak took it for a nice ride himself.

Now you’re talking stupid. How could a bunch of average WRs and an aging TE equate to the best team? Shut that bs up

 

[keysersoze]

I wish Prescott had TO, Witten (2 HOFers) and Bryant in their prime.

Then the judgements could be applied fairly