Sure I am serious. We've had a line considered worse than the 1989 one at one point under romo. Lines don't last. Romo started out with a good line. One game the announcer made a comment about how that line seemed like it had seemed to age over night. It hit its low point when analysts were saying that statistically it was worst than what we had in 1989. Then some good drafting by the cowboys and we had an elite line again. But history tends to repeat itself and just like it happened under romo, I've been fearing this line is aging fast. It's not as bad as some of you make it out to be, and we drafted a piece to hopefully bring it back some youth. But who knows? I expect this line to eventually get a lot worse than it is now, so I find it comical that people are treating it like it is the worst all time, and if Dak is going to be Quarterback here for a long time, then he would need to be able to deal with lines much worse than what we have now. You can't just keep drafting Offensive Linemen in the first round every year. There a lot of teams in the NFL, where the fans could whine about the line, that is just the hand that you are dealt with. You don't think a quarterback should be able to adjust to deficiencies in the team?