Dak's 3 turnovers signal a deeper problem with this QB

Acceptablename

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,341
Reaction score
1,567
And tha is he is snakebit.
He's capable of running an offensive machine and putting up good stata.

But 3 TURNOVERS in a game?
Against a pathetic, injured Titans team????

Dak, bland men and frustrated fans, is no leader at crunch time because he is snakebit.
His career playoffs win of ONE game in 7 years proves he is no Aikman, no Romo.

He is tied with Derrick Carr (now benched) for the NFL lead in interceptuons. What are we to make of tha?
Yes it’s obvious that Prescott is a serial killer it’s a deep problem I don’t know what we’re going to do
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Not because of Dak. Because of Pollard and Elliott and the run game.
Dak has hurt the Cowboys with his interceptions, and the team has been forced to win in spite of him. In two games they couldn't overcome them. In at least two games the refs had to help.
Let's not forget who started this roll to a 12-4 record; Cooper Rush had to get the team going in the right direction after Dak choked in the season opener and embarrassed the Cowboys. Cooper Rush is 4-1; Dak is 8-3.

So why was the offense near the bottom when Rush was the helm
 

Cmac

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,277
Reaction score
8,813
Did you watch the game? Seriously. Did you watch it ? Last night Tyler B hiked the ball up his own butt. It really never made it to Prescott. The 1st Int was ALL Hendershot. Hit him between the 8 and 9 and he bobbled it right to the defender. 2nd Int was Prescotts fault. So 1 bad play. Im not forgiving Dak for all his turnovers but can't blame him either. If you can't see the difference maybe football isn't your game.
I can't wait for a Golfer to blame his caddie for the missed chip shot.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,656
Reaction score
16,456
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
And tha is he is snakebit.
He's capable of running an offensive machine and putting up good stata.

But 3 TURNOVERS in a game?
Against a pathetic, injured Titans team????

Dak, bland men and frustrated fans, is no leader at crunch time because he is snakebit.
His career playoffs win of ONE game in 7 years proves he is no Aikman, no Romo.

He is tied with Derrick Carr (now benched) for the NFL lead in interceptuons. What are we to make of tha?

I was trained to eat snake to survive...Dak is hunting for the anaconda under that bench, he better kill the head or get it right. Don't shoot blanks.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
And you keep reading. Wha's it say about you, Mr. Ken and Barbie eyeroller?
You are into self-flagilation? Is Barbie into tha, Ke?
You are a concern of mine. Doesn't play well. Judgmental. Miffed at posts. Ken the miffy. Ken the piffy-peeved.
Turn tha frown upside down into a smile.
tenor.png
So original.

You should consider writing childrens books, for real!
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
Profound response. I really don't know how to respond to this. lol
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,378
Reaction score
7,002
How could i ever "Hang" with you when you think Dak inherited a team that went 13-3 the year before lol.

FYI: they went 4-12 the year before.

Oh and you want to see Dak with a bad line? Take a look at 2018 where he was sacked 56 times (20 more than romo ever was) and still won the division and a playoff game.

You have no clue...

FYI Romo had 4 tds in 4 playoff games until his very good playoffs in 2014. So you saying he was "good in the playoffs" is not exactly accurate.

Oh wow, I mistook the 2014 season which was 12-4 with the 2015 season which was 4-12 and yes Dak had the 13-3 season. Terrible! My Bad...I must be slipping in my old age but wait...who was that 4-12 team missing from that 12-4 team the year before?

As far as leaving the good playoff game out which is disingenuous, he was good. He did his job.

Let's take a closer look at the sacks. Even with Dak's 56-sack season in his seven years, Romo still has more sacks in a seven-year period - by 25 and a string of 36,36,35,& 29. His lines were consistently bad.

But much like life, there are good posting days and bad and I had a bad one. As I said, Dak's story is still being written so don't disappear on us in the playoffs.
 

leeblair

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
5,965
So why was the offense near the bottom when Rush was the helm
You keep asking an irrelevant question, but the answer has already been given: McCarthy and Moore restricted the offense to give Rush time to adjust. He had to come in off the bench and they wanted to take it slow and give him time to adapt.
Plus, the run game was still developing. McCarthy has said they were going to move toward a run first offense and it was a process. It didn't peak until after Dak came back in.
But the question is irrelevant; who cares about the offense rankings? They were winning.
 

Ken

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,705
Reaction score
17,366
Oh wow, I mistook the 2014 season which was 12-4 with the 2015 season which was 4-12 and yes Dak had the 13-3 season. Terrible! My Bad...I must be slipping in my old age but wait...who was that 4-12 team missing from that 12-4 team the year before?

As far as leaving the good playoff game out which is disingenuous, he was good. He did his job.

Let's take a closer look at the sacks. Even with Dak's 56-sack season in his seven years, Romo still has more sacks in a seven-year period - by 25 and a string of 36,36,35,& 29. His lines were consistently bad.

But much like life, there are good posting days and bad and I had a bad one. As I said, Dak's story is still being written so don't disappear on us in the playoffs.
They were missing the offensive player of the year, Demarco Murray. They also missed Romo for 12 games.

So you agree, Dak was pretty darn special to make up that gap, along with Zeke?

I'm not going to argue that Romo had some bad lines, i was just pointing out how Dak actually performed when he was beaten to hell one season.
 
Top