The burden of proof isn't really on me. You are arguing Dak's stats were relevant and when we had a competing chance in the game. That's already been debunked so...I just assume you have special issues.
Is that hateful? Point out the hatefulness. I'll sincerely interested in this...if not just to watch you slowly walk back YOUR hyperbolic language.
But is that not true? Seems it is from the history of many posts and threads.
The hate part comes from just about your every post to downing Dak. Even when it is good news.
But you don't throw to yourself...or block for yourself. It takes the whole team to make a completion or TD.
THIS sums it up perfectly.
Ok, see. It wasn't anything in the post...it was "every post", which is an exaggeration. I have repeatedly said overreach is the enemy of a good argument. So, I give Dak his due. You on the other hand overreached and don't give me mine. I didn't realize there was a quota of positive posts for Dak or anyone is keeping count.
"I just know I am right" - very emotional. Cool...to each his own.
That all. I have no further comments.
I just know I am right.
my point is more about the extremes either way. I've never been a Dak lover. I was extremely upset when they rode with him over Romo. The first few years I thought he was less than steller on a reasonably solid offense. The last couple years I think he progressed into a solid QB. Nothing stellar but certainly capable of working with a team to get to the Superbowl.
"Nyah Nyah Nyah I don't have to back up anything I say, it's easier just to throw half assed insults"
Are you quoting yourself?
I also agree about extremes. It's a typical human endeavor.
That would be the extreme who think Dak can do no wrong.
"I know you are but what am I?" and the cliched nonsense just keeps coming
Which is like 2 people on this site. They harp on the small minority to defend their takes smh.
