Dallas All-Time Passing Leaders

KJJ said:
Aikman never had to put up big numbers with the all time leading rusher and the great teams he had around him.
Click to expand...
Wing a SB is a team thing. And the game has changed so much. Old passing records have to be taken in context.
 
leeblair said:
All that matters is championships and wins in big games.
Stats are how losers try to justify themselves.
Click to expand...

If all that matters is championships.... then according to what you've said, Nick Foles and Trent Dilfer should be held in higher regard than Dan Marino and Jim Kelly, correct?

Then you said "stats are how losers justify themselves"?

Well why are stats used to determine drafting order, they're used to negotiate contracts, they're used to select Pro bowlers, All-Pros, MVPs and most of all.... they're used to induct players into the Pro Football Hall of Fame?

Are those losers justifying those categories as well?
 
irishline said:
How many Super Bowls do you think that team wins with Steve Walsh?

Do you think we would have been in and won the same with Craig Morton as we did with Roger Staubach?

While A QB is not the only piece, they are an important piece. I pretty much believe the answer to the two questions above is not as many.
Click to expand...
Steve Walsh did get the only win the Cowboys had in 89. On some real great teams like we had in the 90s who knows where we would have gotten with Walsh. Aikman was clearly the better QB and although his numbers weren’t big, he made big plays when it mattered most. As for Craig Morton it’s obvious we wouldn’t have won a championship with him. He folded in some critical games including a couple of SBs with the Cowboys and Denver. He had some “choke” in him while Staubach had a lot of “clutch.” Staubach was a much better QB than Morton especially when it mattered most.
 
GINeric said:
If all that matters is championships.... then according to what you've said, Nick Foles and Trent Dilfer should be held in higher regard than Dan Marino and Jim Kelly, correct?

Then you said "stats are how losers justify themselves"?

Well why are stats used to determine drafting order, they're used to negotiate contracts, they're used to select Pro bowlers, All-Pros, MVPs and most of all.... they're used to induct players into the Pro Football Hall of Fame?

Are those losers justifying those categories as well?
Click to expand...
LMAO !!

Are you really trying to put Dak in the same Cat as Marino and Kelly ??

I know your a homer , who salivates anything CHOKE, but man even this is a stretch for you ,

lmaoo

Dak is comparable to Cousins, Darnold and Mayfield . All mid tier trash
 
HonoluluCowboy said:
LMAO !!

Are you really trying to put Dak in the same Cat as Marino and Kelly ??

I know your a homer , who salivates anything CHOKE, but man even this is a stretch for you ,

lmaoo

Dak is comparable to Cousins, Darnold and Mayfield . All mid tier trash
Click to expand...
You lost accomplishments and real achievements. His rookie season he won 13 games and should have won 15.

You insult my inteligence by sticking to Jerry insults and then Dak. Go hug your calendar.
 
Aikman would have had a lot struggles with the teams Romo and Dak had. Troy would had to put up big numbers which would have led to injuries and frustration. He struggled early and late in his career when his teams weren’t very good. He played some real good games earlier in his career that the Cowboys lost.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 768 (members: 62, guests: 706)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,533
Messages
13,881,231
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top