News: Dallas Cowboys Running Backs In Comparison To 2015 Draft Targets

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
48,417
Reaction score
23,173
Dallas Cowboys Running Backs In Comparison To 2015 Draft Targets
267643_10150249116363898_1719763_n.jpg

KD Drummond
http://www.scout.com/nfl/cowboys/story/1599281-2015-rookie-rbs-vs-cowboys-committee-report




The Cowboys decided against selecting a running back in this year's draft, despite it's heralded depth. Did they make the right call? We look at the early results.

Through the first half of the offseason, Dallas fans and media went to tremendous lengths to handicap the running back landscape. Moving on from DeMarco Murray seemed inevitable, based on common logic of what his historic season would mean for his contract demands, and what the team would be willing to pay. **click-bait** quickly concluded that Dallas would emulate their 2009 approach and more recently the approach of the Super Bowl champion Patriots and employ a running back committee.

Sure enough, as the dust settled, the RBBC is what Dallas is using, though it’s not structured the way it was anticipated. Committees normally have a good all-around back, a pass-catching back, a thumper back and a scatback. Dallas has yet to have all of these available for their use.

Most thought that Joseph Randle and Ryan Williams would be the candidates for the lead role. Dallas signed Darren McFadden as well, but at the time some didn’t think he warranted much consideration beyond “just a flyer”. Lance Dunbar’s role of always-projected-to-be “Weapon X” left him pretty safe as the change-of-pace back, although he had been highly under-utliized the previous three seasons.

Williams’ knee, however, gave him trouble again and led to his eventual release. McFadden missed most of the offseason dealing with hamstring issues. Randle avoided getting in any additional trouble (at least that made it public) and locked down the lead role after showing well in extremely limited 2014 duty...
 
Dallas Cowboys Running Backs In Comparison To 2015 Draft Targets
267643_10150249116363898_1719763_n.jpg

KD Drummond
http://www.scout.com/nfl/cowboys/story/1599281-2015-rookie-rbs-vs-cowboys-committee-report




The Cowboys decided against selecting a running back in this year's draft, despite it's heralded depth. Did they make the right call? We look at the early results.

Through the first half of the offseason, Dallas fans and media went to tremendous lengths to handicap the running back landscape. Moving on from DeMarco Murray seemed inevitable, based on common logic of what his historic season would mean for his contract demands, and what the team would be willing to pay. **click-bait** quickly concluded that Dallas would emulate their 2009 approach and more recently the approach of the Super Bowl champion Patriots and employ a running back committee.

Sure enough, as the dust settled, the RBBC is what Dallas is using, though it’s not structured the way it was anticipated. Committees normally have a good all-around back, a pass-catching back, a thumper back and a scatback. Dallas has yet to have all of these available for their use.

Most thought that Joseph Randle and Ryan Williams would be the candidates for the lead role. Dallas signed Darren McFadden as well, but at the time some didn’t think he warranted much consideration beyond “just a flyer”. Lance Dunbar’s role of always-projected-to-be “Weapon X” left him pretty safe as the change-of-pace back, although he had been highly under-utliized the previous three seasons.

Williams’ knee, however, gave him trouble again and led to his eventual release. McFadden missed most of the offseason dealing with hamstring issues. Randle avoided getting in any additional trouble (at least that made it public) and locked down the lead role after showing well in extremely limited 2014 duty...

RB stats are worthless unless they have at least 100 carries in a season and 125 is better.

Randle had a 6.7 ypc which was the highest in the league last season. The reason is that he only had 51 carries making the sample size too small to have any value.
 
Everyone always goes nuts when they see a college highlight video. " oh man...this guy can play I'm telln ya..l.ive been following him since pee wee.." Or this is the next AD or the next Barry sanders. Truth is the vast majority of college players don't make it in the NFL. Yeah they look good playing against other college guys but The NFL is where the professionals play. RG3 looked great ( to most ) at Baylor throwing to Twill against UNT and SamHouston State or UT Elpaso.
 
RB stats are worthless unless they have at least 100 carries in a season and 125 is better.

Randle had a 6.7 ypc which was the highest in the league last season. The reason is that he only had 51 carries making the sample size too small to have any value.

6a00e54f7fc4c58833015437061531970c-250wi

Julius Jones should have taught us that:D
 
6a00e54f7fc4c58833015437061531970c-250wi

Julius Jones should have taught us that:D

yet he did have really big games for us in 2004 and a couple in 2005. So the talent was there. What happened to him is still a real mystery to me. He NEVER looked like he did in 2004 ever again. THe quickness and balance he showed disappeared never to be seen again.
 
Whatever the case may be.

Letting Murray walk, and replacing him with Randle\DMC\Williams\Dunbar.........................was reckless. Just a really bad, bad decision.


but our salary cap is in good shape, right?
 
Johnson would have cost us our 3rd round pick (Chaz Green) and our 5th round pick (Ryan Russell). I could live with that.

However, there was no way for Dallas to get up to the 10th pick without giving up Randy Gregory and possibly a future 1st round pick.
 
yet he did have really big games for us in 2004 and a couple in 2005. So the talent was there. What happened to him is still a real mystery to me. He NEVER looked like he did in 2004 ever again. THe quickness and balance he showed disappeared never to be seen again.

It's not a mystery..Parcells ruined him. He got on him about every little thing, made him hold the ball different made him be more patient for the holes. He lost his confidence and vision. That was the weirdest thing I've seen. He came out the gate like a real prospect. I blame some of that on Parcells for sure.
 
yet he did have really big games for us in 2004 and a couple in 2005. So the talent was there. What happened to him is still a real mystery to me. He NEVER looked like he did in 2004 ever again. THe quickness and balance he showed disappeared never to be seen again.

Imo, I think he got too big.
 
I really liked David Johnson in the draft

In the third when the remaining RB started going early he was the only RB left for quite some time. When he went well before our pick, it was a disappointing moment. SJ even said they were interested in the presser afterwards. Byron, Gregory, Wilson and Collins have been pretty good so far at least.
 
yet he did have really big games for us in 2004 and a couple in 2005. So the talent was there. What happened to him is still a real mystery to me. He NEVER looked like he did in 2004 ever again. THe quickness and balance he showed disappeared never to be seen again.

Oh, I was on the bandwagon too most definitely. :(
 
In the third when the remaining RB started going early he was the only RB left for quite some time. When he went well before our pick, it was a disappointing moment. SJ even said they were interested in the presser afterwards. Byron, Gregory, Wilson and Collins have been pretty good so far at least.
He went just 5 picks before Dallas'. All Dallas would have had to do was trade 3rd round picks and add a 5th.

Hindsight...I know....
 
Again, speaking with the wisdom of hindsight. It doesn't take genius to look at the past and say "hey, why didn't we do this?". The FO prepared a respectable compensation package for Murray to keep him onboard and he rejected it. So, the FO had to make other plans.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,169
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top