Dallas should sign B.Marshall Now!!

tunahelper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
2,156
AbeBeta;3304736 said:
No, actually yours is.

Note that we would be spending millions to make this deal. We aren't going to spend 20 mill to pay Marshall's SB just to get another first round pick. Nor are we going to **** with the commish by trying some poison pill provision

Once again you either didnt read the link or your having reading comprehension issues. The article states ways SD with 27 pick could fashion the contract to aviod being clamped with owing salary.

Also remember no salary cap, so if the signing bonus was stipulated to be delayed upon a trade with Seattle Dallas would owe nothing.

Do you have anymore uninformed comments?
 

SDCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,763
Reaction score
22,734
If we made a trade for one of the top 5 receivers in the league...why in the blue hell would be trade him to Seattle? :lmao2:
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,683
Reaction score
12,392
tunahelper;3304783 said:
Once again you either didnt read the link or your having reading comprehension issues. The article states ways SD with 27 pick could fashion the contract to aviod being clamped with owing salary.

Also remember no salary cap, so if the signing bonus was stipulated to be delayed upon a trade with Seattle Dallas would owe nothing.

Do you have anymore uninformed comments?

The article is not based in reality.

The league is not going to let teams skirt the rules in that manner. Plain and simple. (see pill, poison; see also, Goodell, Roger)

Do you have any actually informed comments or is your perception of what is possible based entirely on your reading of profootballtalk?
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,458
Reaction score
11,571
lol omg this thread got too serious too quick. too many people on here take themselves too serious.
 

tunahelper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
2,156
AbeBeta;3304960 said:
The article is not based in reality.

The league is not going to let teams skirt the rules in that manner. Plain and simple. (see pill, poison; see also, Goodell, Roger)

Do you have any actually informed comments or is your perception of what is possible based entirely on your reading of profootballtalk?

Well the league lost in arbitraton when they tried to outlaw the poison pill. I find your opinion on the matter to be short of the arbitrator's.

At least you read the article this time before commenting.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
SDCowboy85;3304849 said:
If we made a trade for one of the top 5 receivers in the league...why in the blue hell would be trade him to Seattle? :lmao2:
Because we don't want this ******** on our team. Do the letters TO mean anything to you?
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
There is a gentlemen's agreement not to use it anyway. That arbitration case was BS.

We unloaded all our knucklheads (except for Bennett) why would we get anymore?
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,683
Reaction score
12,392
tunahelper;3305075 said:
Well the league lost in arbitraton when they tried to outlaw the poison pill. I find your opinion on the matter to be short of the arbitrator's.

At least you read the article this time before commenting.

And how many poison pills have we seen since then?

I find your opinion on the matter to be short of the reality governing the behavior of teams. You seriously don't think anyone has had this thought in the past? You think this is some new idea? No, it is just some moronic stuff tossed out to excite the Madden heads and Fantasy lovers.
 

Cover 2

Pessimists Unite!!!
Messages
3,496
Reaction score
452
If the Seahawks wanted to they could just offer their 14th pick to the Broncos. I'm sure they would gladly take it. You can negotiate compensation, it doesn't have to be for what the tender is.
 

tunahelper

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,684
Reaction score
2,156
Cover 2;3305296 said:
If the Seahawks wanted to they could just offer their 14th pick to the Broncos. I'm sure they would gladly take it. You can negotiate compensation, it doesn't have to be for what the tender is.

The article claims Denver wants the 6th, so that is why the option would work for us.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
tunahelper;3304526 said:
Because they have two 1st round picks the 6th and the 14th. They want to save the 6th. That is why added the link.

:laugh1:
:laugh2: my bad...I have a tendency to not read links...silly me
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,227
Reaction score
16,868
After Jerry just came out against Poison Pills in contracts I seriously doubt he would use one. That said I also seriously doubt Denver is going to match any offer given to Marshall, they want him out of town.
 

Nightshade

Active Member
Messages
1,811
Reaction score
1
I figured when I saw it was from tunahelper that it would be worth a look. No Moss growing on this posters posterior.

Bold idea.
 

Four

New Member
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
1
the 14th pick is a pick they got from another team and as such is not tradable, that's what they say on denver radio.

moot point.
 
Top