Daniel Ross to IR

From a player perspective do they get paid the same whether they're active or on IR?
 
From a player perspective do they get paid the same whether they're active or on IR?

Yes they do get paid their normal salary however long they are IR.

If a team cuts a player before they are medically cleared to play. The team has to pay them an injury settlement. I’m not sure what injury settlement figures are.
 
Yes they do get paid their normal salary however long they are IR.

If a team cuts a player before they are medically cleared to play. The team has to pay them an injury settlement. I’m not sure what injury settlement figures are.

Actually, I think many players have split contracts that specify a % of their contract they will get if they go on IR.
 
Actually, I think many players have split contracts that specify a % of their contract they will get if they go on IR.

True. But that's a real jerk move by the team if you've got a guy who played for you in actual games.

It is fine for a UDFA but not someone who contributed.
 
From a player perspective do they get paid the same whether they're active or on IR?
Same pay if they stay on IR all year. The team has the option to cut them when healthy.

Cedrick Wilson got his scheduled pay for 2018 while on IR.
 
True. But that's a real jerk move by the team if you've got a guy who played for you in actual games.

It is fine for a UDFA but not someone who contributed.

You could be right. I’m not really sure how it works, I just remember reading about a player going on IR within the last couple of years and it said he would still get half his contract. They called it a split contract. I don’t think it was a big name player so it very well could be something reserved for fringe players who aren’t expected to make the team.
 
True. But that's a real jerk move by the team if you've got a guy who played for you in actual games.

It is fine for a UDFA but not someone who contributed.
I think that is only for players that were injured when signed.
 
I think that is only for players that were injured when signed.

You sure that's a rule or just how we operate. People trash the Joneses but they do prioritize treating players well and not nickel and diming them
 
As long as he is not playing in the games. Ross is not good.
If he was he wouldn't be a backup... didn't he cause the goal line fumble in the Saints or was it another game last year!
 
If he was he wouldn't be a backup... didn't he cause the goal line fumble in the Saints or was it another game last year!

He made an occasional play but was terrible against the run in general.
 
He made an occasional play but was terrible against the run in general.
Hmmm... he backed up woods on every 1/3 series or so last year, I dont really remember their being that noticeable a difference when he was in. If he so bad against the run, then why insert him in the heavy goal line defenses?
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,648
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top