DBair's one and only mock draft

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
I waited till just a few days before for a few reasons, mainly I wanted to see what might play out with Miles Austin. Certainly nothing wrong with doing multiple mock drafts as some do, but I didnt have the time.

Obviously we have 11 picks and 9 of those could be in play (comp picks must be used as we know). I do think we'll see a very active draft weekend, and I think its possible we end up with two first day picks (both 2nd rounders). I dont see us using all 11 picks as is, but for the purposes of this, I will use all 11. Moves I think we'll see:

1) Since we dont have a 1st rd pick, I think they will try to recoup that first day pick by getting a 2nd pick in the 2nd round.

2) I think Greg Ellis will be traded, either for a middle round pick straight up, or perhaps as part of a deal to move up. Contrary to the thoughts of some in here, Ellis does have trade value because he can rush the passer. He has also shown he can do it from either the OLB or LDE spot, which gives us more flexibility.

3) We may trade a pick or two for future picks, as we did last yr. Otherwise I think they will be aggressive and trade up for specific guys they believe fit what they want to do on offense and defense, and wont "wait" or hope for guys to fall in their laps. Especially early.

4) I'm passing on QB. Mainly because I think its an awful QB draft, but also because it isnt a critical need with Romo and Kitna in the fold here. Maybe they sign someone as a rookie f/a and plant them on the PS.

5) I ddnt take an OT until the 7th rd, although I think this is an area they may address alot sooner. To me, the eventual starters at LT and RT are more a critical need than any of the interior OL positions. Of course we dont know how Free is progressing this offseason and if he comes along, we'd be in good shape.

6) Depending on how the draft pans out, they might add a veteran CB via free agency before training camp.

Picks:

2nd rd #51: Louis Delmas SS/FS Western Michigan: I dont think we would get him at 51, so I do see us possibly moving up to insure we do land him, maybe 8-10 spots. Mosley is rarely wrong when it comes to our early picks, and he seems convinced its either Delmas or Robiskie. Safety is the worst position on our team IMO, and this guy should challenge to start from day one and at the least play extensively in the nickel/dime defenses.

3rd rd #69: Lawrence Sidbury OLB Richmond: I think this becomes somewhat of a need pick, as I believe Ellis will be gone. Sidbury gives us more depth and at the least this yr can rotate in on some passing downs and spell Ware/Spencer.

4th rd #101: Brandon Tate WR/Returner North Carolina: Explosive return guy once he gets healthy, also a good developmental WR that also is showing the pure WR skills needed to be a factor. Could be the #3 guy in 2010 but for 2009, greatly impacts our field position via punt and maybe kickoff returns too. Butch Davis loves the kid, and we know he has a number of close ties here.

4th rd #117: Jason Phillips ILB TCU: Has to get healthy, but we have the luxury of waiting on him. Probably more of a special team demon early on, but could be eventual replacement for Keith Brooking down the road. Love this kids attitude.

5th rd #156: Kyle Moore DE USC: They are obviously at least considering DE's, as they brought in Jarron Gilbert for a visit. Bown is a JAG, Hatcher has not come on and Spears is in the last yr of his contract. Moore is a guy many seem to think will add quite a bit of weight to his frame and be an ideal 3-4 DE.

5th rd #166: Roy Miller NT Texas: They get the high motor rotational NT here. Probably will never be a starter, but is the perfect complement to Ratliff and could also pay some dividends in a short yardage DT role.

5th rd # 172: Roger Allen OG Missouri Western: Guard isnt an area I think is a critical need but this kid has some flexibility to play outside in a pinch because of the long arms. Potentially physical, overpowering drive blocker than you know Houck and Garrett will like. Alot of upside here.

6th rd #197: Don Carey CB Norfolk St: Small school developmental CB can compete for a spot.

6th rd #208: Brannan Southerland: Do everything FB, is a decent short yardage runner, good receiver and capable blocker. Should compete against Deon Anderson for FB spot, who hasnt been the lead blocker many had thought he would be. With emphasis on the run, this position is a key again.

7th rd #210: Sebastian Vollmer OT Houston: Developmental T to compete against McQusitan and Free...picked him because of the apparent interest and visits.

7th rd #227: Otis Wiley FS/SS Michigan St: Safety is a position we need alot of help at. Developmental guy with atheltic abillity and special teams skill.
 

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
dbair1967;2736519 said:
I waited till just a few days before for a few reasons, mainly I wanted to see what might play out with Miles Austin. Certainly nothing wrong with doing multiple mock drafts as some do, but I didnt have the time.

Obviously we have 11 picks and 9 of those could be in play (comp picks must be used as we know). I do think we'll see a very active draft weekend, and I think its possible we end up with two first day picks (both 2nd rounders). I dont see us using all 11 picks as is, but for the purposes of this, I will use all 11. Moves I think we'll see:

1) Since we dont have a 1st rd pick, I think they will try to recoup that first day pick by getting a 2nd pick in the 2nd round.

2) I think Greg Ellis will be traded, either for a middle round pick straight up, or perhaps as part of a deal to move up. Contrary to the thoughts of some in here, Ellis does have trade value because he can rush the passer. He has also shown he can do it from either the OLB or LDE spot, which gives us more flexibility.

3) We may trade a pick or two for future picks, as we did last yr. Otherwise I think they will be aggressive and trade up for specific guys they believe fit what they want to do on offense and defense, and wont "wait" or hope for guys to fall in their laps. Especially early.

4) I'm passing on QB. Mainly because I think its an awful QB draft, but also because it isnt a critical need with Romo and Kitna in the fold here. Maybe they sign someone as a rookie f/a and plant them on the PS.

5) I ddnt take an OT until the 7th rd, although I think this is an area they may address alot sooner. To me, the eventual starters at LT and RT are more a critical need than any of the interior OL positions. Of course we dont know how Free is progressing this offseason and if he comes along, we'd be in good shape.

6) Depending on how the draft pans out, they might add a veteran CB via free agency before training camp.

Picks:

2nd rd #51: Louis Delmas SS/FS Western Michigan: I dont think we would get him at 51, so I do see us possibly moving up to insure we do land him, maybe 8-10 spots. Mosley is rarely wrong when it comes to our early picks, and he seems convinced its either Delmas or Robiskie. Safety is the worst position on our team IMO, and this guy should challenge to start from day one and at the least play extensively in the nickel/dime defenses.

3rd rd #69: Lawrence Sidbury OLB Richmond: I think this becomes somewhat of a need pick, as I believe Ellis will be gone. Sidbury gives us more depth and at the least this yr can rotate in on some passing downs and spell Ware/Spencer.

4th rd #101: Brandon Tate WR/Returner North Carolina: Explosive return guy once he gets healthy, also a good developmental WR that also is showing the pure WR skills needed to be a factor. Could be the #3 guy in 2010 but for 2009, greatly impacts our field position via punt and maybe kickoff returns too. Butch Davis loves the kid, and we know he has a number of close ties here.

4th rd #117: Jason Phillips ILB TCU: Has to get healthy, but we have the luxury of waiting on him. Probably more of a special team demon early on, but could be eventual replacement for Keith Brooking down the road. Love this kids attitude.

5th rd #156: Kyle Moore DE USC: They are obviously at least considering DE's, as they brought in Jarron Gilbert for a visit. Bown is a JAG, Hatcher has not come on and Spears is in the last yr of his contract. Moore is a guy many seem to think will add quite a bit of weight to his frame and be an ideal 3-4 DE.

5th rd #166: Roy Miller NT Texas: They get the high motor rotational NT here. Probably will never be a starter, but is the perfect complement to Ratliff and could also pay some dividends in a short yardage DT role.

5th rd # 172: Roger Allen OG Missouri Western: Guard isnt an area I think is a critical need but this kid has some flexibility to play outside in a pinch because of the long arms. Potentially physical, overpowering drive blocker than you know Houck and Garrett will like. Alot of upside here.

6th rd #197: Don Carey CB Norfolk St: Small school developmental CB can compete for a spot.

6th rd #208: Brannan Southerland: Do everything FB, is a decent short yardage runner, good receiver and capable blocker. Should compete against Deon Anderson for FB spot, who hasnt been the lead blocker many had thought he would be. With emphasis on the run, this position is a key again.

7th rd #210: Sebastian Vollmer OT Houston: Developmental T to compete against McQusitan and Free...picked him because of the apparent interest and visits.

7th rd #227: Otis Wiley FS/SS Michigan St: Safety is a position we need alot of help at. Developmental guy with atheltic abillity and special teams skill.

i could live with that draft, pretty decent draft but i still think the cowboys will draft a QB
 

RS12

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,529
Reaction score
29,874
I like the draft but would also be open to highest value pick at 51 any position unless QB RB or TE. Most intriguing pick Don Carey. Read he was playing CB at 6-4 242. Is that correct?
 

28 Joker

28 Joker
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
1
If it really is Delmas and Robiskie, please let it be Delmas. I think it's definately S and WR that we are looking to go with in round 2.

Is Ellis going to have to rework his contract to be traded? He only had 3 sacks in his first 10 games and looked old and slow. I wonder what Dallas could get for him.

It seems like teams would just wait for him to be cut. His $ 6.25 million dollar hit is way too high, imo. Teams are not going to want to pay that, imo.

I'm for trading him, though. I'd trade Crayton, too. He's productive and made some big plays, but his attitude is at best suspect, imo. Crayton can be replaced, imo. He's easily defended on the outside. I remember his last anti-Romo/Garrett comments in the media.

You are either with us, or you are under the boot, imo. You are gone.

I really like the FB from Georgia. He's a "Bulldog". He can block, and his legs never stop moving. Plus, he can catch the ball and go north and south. He can score TDs, too.
 

JIMMYBUFFETT

Skinwalker
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
5,717
Agree completely on #2 . I think Ellis is gone and I think there's a good chance it will be to Cleveland . I think Dallas will make a play for Robiskie . I like Delmas a lot , but it's a pretty good safety draft and I think guys like Hamlin , McBath , and Bruton will still be available in the third .

I agree on the QB too . Unless somebody takes a big tumble into the 5th or 6th round , I just don't see them pulling the trigger . If McGee is the one that tumbles though , Dallas will have a tough decision .
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
dbair1967;2736519 said:
I waited till just a few days before for a few reasons, mainly I wanted to see what might play out with Miles Austin. Certainly nothing wrong with doing multiple mock drafts as some do, but I didnt have the time.

Obviously we have 11 picks and 9 of those could be in play (comp picks must be used as we know). I do think we'll see a very active draft weekend, and I think its possible we end up with two first day picks (both 2nd rounders). I dont see us using all 11 picks as is, but for the purposes of this, I will use all 11. Moves I think we'll see:

1) Since we dont have a 1st rd pick, I think they will try to recoup that first day pick by getting a 2nd pick in the 2nd round.

2) I think Greg Ellis will be traded, either for a middle round pick straight up, or perhaps as part of a deal to move up. Contrary to the thoughts of some in here, Ellis does have trade value because he can rush the passer. He has also shown he can do it from either the OLB or LDE spot, which gives us more flexibility.

3) We may trade a pick or two for future picks, as we did last yr. Otherwise I think they will be aggressive and trade up for specific guys they believe fit what they want to do on offense and defense, and wont "wait" or hope for guys to fall in their laps. Especially early.

4) I'm passing on QB. Mainly because I think its an awful QB draft, but also because it isnt a critical need with Romo and Kitna in the fold here. Maybe they sign someone as a rookie f/a and plant them on the PS.

5) I ddnt take an OT until the 7th rd, although I think this is an area they may address alot sooner. To me, the eventual starters at LT and RT are more a critical need than any of the interior OL positions. Of course we dont know how Free is progressing this offseason and if he comes along, we'd be in good shape.

6) Depending on how the draft pans out, they might add a veteran CB via free agency before training camp.

Picks:

2nd rd #51: Louis Delmas SS/FS Western Michigan: I dont think we would get him at 51, so I do see us possibly moving up to insure we do land him, maybe 8-10 spots. Mosley is rarely wrong when it comes to our early picks, and he seems convinced its either Delmas or Robiskie. Safety is the worst position on our team IMO, and this guy should challenge to start from day one and at the least play extensively in the nickel/dime defenses.

3rd rd #69: Lawrence Sidbury OLB Richmond: I think this becomes somewhat of a need pick, as I believe Ellis will be gone. Sidbury gives us more depth and at the least this yr can rotate in on some passing downs and spell Ware/Spencer.

4th rd #101: Brandon Tate WR/Returner North Carolina: Explosive return guy once he gets healthy, also a good developmental WR that also is showing the pure WR skills needed to be a factor. Could be the #3 guy in 2010 but for 2009, greatly impacts our field position via punt and maybe kickoff returns too. Butch Davis loves the kid, and we know he has a number of close ties here.

4th rd #117: Jason Phillips ILB TCU: Has to get healthy, but we have the luxury of waiting on him. Probably more of a special team demon early on, but could be eventual replacement for Keith Brooking down the road. Love this kids attitude.

5th rd #156: Kyle Moore DE USC: They are obviously at least considering DE's, as they brought in Jarron Gilbert for a visit. Bown is a JAG, Hatcher has not come on and Spears is in the last yr of his contract. Moore is a guy many seem to think will add quite a bit of weight to his frame and be an ideal 3-4 DE.

5th rd #166: Roy Miller NT Texas: They get the high motor rotational NT here. Probably will never be a starter, but is the perfect complement to Ratliff and could also pay some dividends in a short yardage DT role.

5th rd # 172: Roger Allen OG Missouri Western: Guard isnt an area I think is a critical need but this kid has some flexibility to play outside in a pinch because of the long arms. Potentially physical, overpowering drive blocker than you know Houck and Garrett will like. Alot of upside here.

6th rd #197: Don Carey CB Norfolk St: Small school developmental CB can compete for a spot.

6th rd #208: Brannan Southerland: Do everything FB, is a decent short yardage runner, good receiver and capable blocker. Should compete against Deon Anderson for FB spot, who hasnt been the lead blocker many had thought he would be. With emphasis on the run, this position is a key again.

7th rd #210: Sebastian Vollmer OT Houston: Developmental T to compete against McQusitan and Free...picked him because of the apparent interest and visits.

7th rd #227: Otis Wiley FS/SS Michigan St: Safety is a position we need alot of help at. Developmental guy with atheltic abillity and special teams skill.

I would take that in a heartbeat.

And we can get a FA QB to develop.

I figured I would throw some Draft Profile vids in here on some of these guys...

Sidbury...
[youtube]I4OGaozeUcI[/youtube]

Tate...
[youtube]fS6L070REw0[/youtube]

Jason Phillips...
[youtube]AYFN9XJjMf0[/youtube]

Kyle Moore...
[youtube]sMopIYqxEVk[/youtube]

Roy Miller...
[youtube]6WzV9G8SQS8[/youtube]

Brannan Southerland...
[youtube]5VhmOJ8kpF8[/youtube]

Vollmer...
[youtube]KnSVRA9HaXw[/youtube]


Again, I would take this mock in a heartbeat.

Best one I have seen so far for the Cowboys.
 

28 Joker

28 Joker
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
1
Thanks for the videos, DC.

Tate looked good, real good in those clips. That one punt return could win a game in the NFL.

On Southerland:

I said earlier that he keeps his legs moving. I left out the part about him finding the hole and burrowing or bullying his way into the endzone or getting the first down in short yardage. He has the instincts to find the soft spot in short yardage. Plus, he came form a power run offense.

Dallas could have used him in Pittsburgh.

I'm glad this guy is gone.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
dcfanatic;2736783 said:
I would take that in a heartbeat.

And we can get a FA QB to develop.

I figured I would throw some Draft Profile vids in here on some of these guys...

Sidbury...
[youtube]I4OGaozeUcI[/youtube]

Tate...
[youtube]fS6L070REw0[/youtube]

Jason Phillips...
[youtube]AYFN9XJjMf0[/youtube]

Kyle Moore...
[youtube]sMopIYqxEVk[/youtube]

Roy Miller...
[youtube]6WzV9G8SQS8[/youtube]

Brannan Southerland...
[youtube]5VhmOJ8kpF8[/youtube]

Vollmer...
[youtube]KnSVRA9HaXw[/youtube]


Again, I would take this mock in a heartbeat.

Best one I have seen so far for the Cowboys.

DC, great add...thanks for the vids
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
41gy#;2736710 said:
If it really is Delmas and Robiskie, please let it be Delmas. I think it's definately S and WR that we are looking to go with in round 2.

I'm ok with either, but if its WR early I prefer Hakeem Nicks over Robiskie. Also would be plenty happy with Rashad Johnson at FS, but dont know if the Cowboys like him that much.

Is Ellis going to have to rework his contract to be traded? He only had 3 sacks in his first 10 games and looked old and slow. I wonder what Dallas could get for him.

It seems like teams would just wait for him to be cut. His $ 6.25 million dollar hit is way too high, imo. Teams are not going to want to pay that, imo.

We dont have to cut him though, we dont need the cap room for anything. So if somebody wants a veteran pass rusher that can play in either a 3-4 or a 4-3, it makes sense to trade for him. I could see several teams that might be interested. Teams like Cleveland, Cinci, maybe Carolina if they traded Peppers, KC perhaps. Etc Etc

I'm for trading him, though. I'd trade Crayton, too. He's productive and made some big plays, but his attitude is at best suspect, imo. Crayton can be replaced, imo. He's easily defended on the outside. I remember his last anti-Romo/Garrett comments in the media.

The only way I';d trade Crayton is if they ended up with someone like Nicks or Robiskie, who could probably play extensively as a rookie and have some success. Otherwise, there's no way we can trade him. He is too valuable.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
A couple of things that I might change or alter:

1) I really like Antoine Caldwell and think he'd be a solid addition as he can swing between C & G. Would be a substantial upgrade over Proctor IMO

2) I still dont know if they wait as long as I did on OT, unless of course they have confidence in Free and/or McQuistan to develop.

3) Jasper Brinkley might be a better alternative at ILB than Phillips, although I am fine with either.

4) I think some would be surprised, but its pretty obvious they are looking at TE again (brought in NC State's Anthony Hill, and Ciskowski personally attended UNC's pro day and got to see Richard Quinn in person). They also supposedly like the James Casey. With Hill and Quinn though the fit for us is both are big, very physical run blocking TE's. If the commitment is to the run game, we'll see alot of 2 TE sets (and alot of short yardage 3TE sets) so another big, physical mauler at TE makes some sense. I dont think they see Hannah as much more than a "move" TE who is a better receiver than blocker.
 

Macnalty

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,639
Reaction score
2,162
I think this is a realistic scenario, like your logic, I agree there is no way we draft all of these slugs, but the core is very strong with Delmas, Tate, Sidbury, the rest are all reasonable in my opinion. Still flying the McGee(QB) flag if we have the luxury of that kind of pick. If we draft wonderfully we get three starters out of this draft for the future, anymore would be sheer good fortune. Pass the lemon wedge this was a good shot.
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
dbair1967;2736904 said:
A couple of things that I might change or alter:

1) I really like Antoine Caldwell and think he'd be a solid addition as he can swing between C & G. Would be a substantial upgrade over Proctor IMO

2) I still dont know if they wait as long as I did on OT, unless of course they have confidence in Free and/or McQuistan to develop.

3) Jasper Brinkley might be a better alternative at ILB than Phillips, although I am fine with either.

4) I think some would be surprised, but its pretty obvious they are looking at TE again (brought in NC State's Anthony Hill, and Ciskowski personally attended UNC's pro day and got to see Richard Quinn in person). They also supposedly like the James Casey. With Hill and Quinn though the fit for us is both are big, very physical run blocking TE's. If the commitment is to the run game, we'll see alot of 2 TE sets (and alot of short yardage 3TE sets) so another big, physical mauler at TE makes some sense. I dont think they see Hannah as much more than a "move" TE who is a better receiver than blocker.

I'm thinking that maybe we draft a big, run blocking TE like A Hill, and then we move Hannah to H-Back.

If that happens, there is going to be a roster spot battle between Cricket and Hannah, because I doubt we keep 3 TEs and 1 FB and 1 H-Back.

I haven't heard that we're evaluating many FBs thus far, and we are looking at potential H-Back guys (like Casey), so I'm wondering if we're phasing out the traditional FB role?

But I like your draft.

Nicely done.
 

Goldenrichards83

Active Member
Messages
1,612
Reaction score
0
) I really like Antoine Caldwell and think he'd be a solid addition as he can swing between C & G. Would be a substantial upgrade over Proctor IMO

Thats the only thing I would change about your mock. Nice draft.
 

Tobal

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,336
Reaction score
328
I think you did well, sometimes what you need isn't there.... This draft doesn't have alot of OT talent in the mid rounds the value is at center/guard on the oline, which is a need for us.

We need safety, ILB depth and future, NT depth and OLB depth, relief

I think you did well, did you nail the guys we might take? Don't know, but I like the reasoning of your picks.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
I like the draft a ton with the exception of going Tate and Phillips back to back.

That injury stuff scares me... especially for Tate with the ACL.

I disagree about the QB class in one sense. I think this class has more potential long term backups than most. A lot of guys with great raw skills and little experience or tons of experience with little raw skill. So I think you'll see a lot of guys develop over 2 to 4 years into a solid backup role but never achieve that leader status required for franchise QB ability.

But it can be hard to find a good QB fit in the mocks. They seem overvalued projected even as no higher than 3rd QBs in the league going in the top 4 rounds. So we may have to go UDFA and specify we have that 3rd QB role open.

Delmas is the guy I think fits us the best and I love Robiskie so if those are the targets I am happy as a lark. I did like Felix quite a lot but historically Dallas doing what I want in round 1 is a bad, bad thing....
 

Canadian BoyzFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
508
I'm happy to see someone recognize that Delmas will not be there are 51. I will also say the same for Sidbury, he won't be there when we pick in the 3rd.

One of the more realistic mocks I have seen. Nice effort.
I'm still pulling for Terrance Taylor at NT with one of the 5th's we have.
 
Top