DC.com: On The Short End - Marcus Spears (Good Article)

CowboyMike

Stay Thirsty, My Friends
Messages
5,448
Reaction score
669
On The Short End
Ellis: Spears May Be A Victim of Cowboys' Philosophy


IRVING, Texas - There's a chance Marcus Spears won't be a Dallas Cowboy for much longer. And he knows it.

It's not that Spears hasn't played well enough - his coaches and fellow defenders always give him due credit. But Spears is learning, as others have before him, or are currently, that this is a business. And every business has a budget.

Back before the draft last month Jerry Jones was talking about the need to develop young players where possible. Ideally, the Cowboys owner/general manager said, he would like to have some later-round picks turn into starters rather than be forced to spend in free agency. That's just the philosophy. Jones knows statistical production will equal big money for quarterbacks, receivers, pass rushers and cover guys. With that in mind, there must be certain positions where Jones will play things close to the vest when building a team. Offensive line, if possible. Fullback. Kicker. Maybe even safety.

Defensive end in the Cowboys' 3-4 is one of those spots as well, which brings the five-year starter Spears to the crossroads he faces now. Unless they had a chance to get or keep a truly catalytic player, the Cowboys might never spend exorbitantly for the bookends to their defensive front. And since many of the responsibilities for a run-defending lineman involve self-sacrifice, there aren't a lot of catalytic types to be found.

"If you watch the draft, the 3-4 teams, they're looking for those guys," line coach Paul Pasqualoni said Monday. "The kid (Ndamukong) Suh from Nebraska is one of those guys. Richard Seymour out in Oakland is one of those guys. If you've got one of those guys you've got a chance to be a pretty good defense.

"They are hard to find. They're going to go early, and there's just traditionally year-in and year-out not a lot of those guys. Not a lot."

Seymour and (it appears) Suh are in a different category, disruptive enough to make plays and change games on their own. Among 3-4 ends he's worked with, Wade Phillips put Hall of Famers Elvin Bethea and Bruce Smith in that group as well because of their pass-rush ability, a couple guys who could stay on the field on third downs.

As solid and stout as Spears and Igor Olshansky have been for the Cowboys, they aren't Hall of Famers. They weren't No. 2 overall picks, and no team would trade a first-rounder for them at this point in their careers.

Neither is flashy, but then neither was Chris Canty, really, and he got a $42 million contract from the New York Giants. The Olshansky-for-Canty change last March suggests the Cowboys won't overpay for players who, by their job description, are not likely to change the game themselves. Spears says he knows he's played well because the defense ranked fourth in rushing yards allowed per game, while Bradie James and Keith Brooking combined for 337 tackles.

"That's how I gauge myself, honestly," Spears said. "When I look at film, I look at 'Did I let that guard get to Bradie? Did I let those guys off the line? Are my linebackers free making plays? Am I making the plays that I'm supposed to make?' And not a lot of times this year I can say that didn't happen. I'll continue to gauge it off that because that's my job."

At that position, very few can go above and beyond the job description. Now, that doesn't mean the defense wouldn't suffer if such solid ends as Spears and Olshansky were replaced by guys off the street, but then again the Cowboys evidently don't think Jason Hatcher and Stephen Bowen are bums.

Whether or not economic realities of the uncapped year were in play, Hatcher and Bowen were tendered more lucrative one-year contracts than their fellow end Spears, the starter. Combined with the team's apparent lack of interest in extending his deal, the tender offer left Spears wondering if he would be traded during the draft.

He wasn't, and now the Cowboys seem set to let him play out the season at a bargain price, $1.226 million, non-guaranteed. If he were a guy who couldn't be taken off the field, that's one thing. But Spears doesn't offer the pass-rush ability of Bowen or Hatcher, especially not if he's going to take the pounding on the two run downs to start a series. The Cowboys like the rotation they have going along the line, which is precisely the reason they won't be paying anyone Canty money.

"I just think there's a lot of wear and tear on you," Pasqualoni said. "The good teams I've been around have got guys that are specialists. Rushing the passer is a full-time job in this league. You can't be a part-time guy."

Spears has all but resigned himself to the idea he'll have to go elsewhere for a big payday, but he's vowed to not make it an issue.

"I only know how to play one way," Spears said. "If it's not good enough for them then it'll have to be good enough for somebody else. I would like to think I've been playing at a pretty high level around here.

"I think that puts pressure on yourself when you're thinking of a contract year. I've just got to play football and it'll work out. I'm not one of those guys to start pressing the panic button."

Spears, Hatcher, and Bowen are all valuable to the team, and by excelling at their respective jobs they each drive up their own marketability. So Spears has to keep doing his thing on first and second downs, and Hatcher and Bowen have to play just as well when they're called upon. They've got to make an impact getting after the quarterback on third down.

If the Cowboys win the Super Bowl, everybody gets paid. It has happened before.
 
I really hope everything works out for Spears, but you can't pay everybody.
 
I like Spears a lot. I like the spirit that he brings to the defensive line. To me, he pays for his spot...and sometimes fine lining the contribution on a monetary basis one loses the football player in a role. I think that the freshness is justification for drive at third down and the retention of both Bowen and Hatcher. That stated, Spears brings some top end mobility to a defensive line position as well. I want to see him a Cowboy for another four years with the current backups as well. I like this group a lot.
 
Spears has value beyond his play on the field. I'd like to see the team offer him at least the top of what they've slotted for the DE position. Loyalty and professionalism should be rewarded, where possible.
 
As a group I think we have the best Defensive Ends of any 3-4 outside of Miami.

I really love the idea of essentially evenly splitting snaps between 4 DE's - 2 for rushing downs, 2 for passing downs.

It saves a lot of money, and keeps everyone fresh.

However, I think Bowen can do his job at a very comparable level.

If Marcus Dixon can take over Bowen's role...


Then I say trade him now. He's worth his tender this year, but I want whatever we can get out of a trade rather than losing him to free agency next year.
 
It does make me wonder a bit why Bowen and Hatcher were worth such high tenders.
 
baj1dallas;3413910 said:
It does make me wonder a bit why Bowen and Hatcher were worth such high tenders.

Because Hatcher is a better overall player and Bowen is a better pass rusher. I don't know why people can't see that.
 
baj1dallas;3413910 said:
It does make me wonder a bit why Bowen and Hatcher were worth such high tenders.

It's because they're valuable role players, and the compensation for them was lower if another team had made an offer. And we'd have been happy not to match an offer for Spears, so we made it as enticing as possible.
 
Ellis used the right term that being a 3-4 defensive end requires. Sacrifice. Marcus Spears could very well have been racking up sacks as a 4-3 end, we'll never really know. But, he's sacrificed potential personal glory for us to be a 3-4 end with the Cowboys, and he's been a very good one.
 
newnationcb;3413915 said:
Because Hatcher is a better overall player and Bowen is a better pass rusher. I don't know why people can't see that.

If Hatcher is better, why wouldn't he play on 1st and 2nd down?
 
Idgit;3413923 said:
It's because they're valuable role players, and the compensation for them was lower if another team had made an offer. And we'd have been happy not to match an offer for Spears, so we made it as enticing as possible.

well the compensation is based on the tender...couldn't we have matched any 2nd round tender offer to either? Would either have been offered a major long term deal that the Cowboys couldn't have matched?
 
Idgit;3413923 said:
It's because they're valuable role players, and the compensation for them was lower if another team had made an offer. And we'd have been happy not to match an offer for Spears, so we made it as enticing as possible.

We gave Spears the original draft pick tender, which would have rewarded us a first round pick if anyone had signed him away from us. Bowen and Hatcher would have given us a 2nd, so as far as compensation, we made it harder for someone to sign Spears. Contract-wise, though, we're paying the other two more. It confuses me a bit, but to my understanding that's what it is.
 
whats suprising is the coming out of College...pash rushing ability is why Dallas drafted Spears. Now he comes off the field on passing downs....go figure.
 
CowboyMike;3414104 said:
We gave Spears the original draft pick tender, which would have rewarded us a first round pick if anyone had signed him away from us. Bowen and Hatcher would have given us a 2nd, so as far as compensation, we made it harder for someone to sign Spears. Contract-wise, though, we're paying the other two more. It confuses me a bit, but to my understanding that's what it is.

I don't remember why, but the original round tender for spears should have been a 1st, but talk at the time was that we'd only net a second. The salary slotted to go with the original round tender, though was lower than the second round tender.

Basically, we invited teams to make Spears a long-term offer. Either to net the pick and elevate Bowen/Hatcher, or to have the other team negotiate a long-term deal that included giving up the draft pick, and then matching what likely would have been a relatively affordable deal.

So, basically, draft pick compensation would have been the same, but presumably you'd be getting a better player with Spears, so that was the bait for other teams.

The downside would be a contract you didn't want to match. The upside was a discount for this year, a demonstration that his market value isn't as high as he might have expected, and more time to work out a possible extension with the team having the advantage if you run the gauntlet and win.

EDIT: I can't find details, but it looks like the original round tender is just arbitrarily capped at a 2nd round pick. It's an instrument that's meant to be applied for any level below the 2nd round tender and is structured to provide a higher floor on the salary for any player deemed valuable enough to tender. With the notion being that 1st and 2nd round picks would receive one of the top three tenders and an even higher slotted salary.
 
The article stated it succinctly, Spears is not a catalytic player, and won't be paid like one. At least not with the Cowboys.

Rat is a catalytic dlineman. So is Seymour. And Kevin Williams. Shaun Rogers as well. Another playmaking DL is Justin Smith albeit underrated.
 
CCBoy;3413860 said:
I like Spears a lot. I like the spirit that he brings to the defensive line. To me, he pays for his spot...and sometimes fine lining the contribution on a monetary basis one loses the football player in a role. I think that the freshness is justification for drive at third down and the retention of both Bowen and Hatcher. That stated, Spears brings some top end mobility to a defensive line position as well. I want to see him a Cowboy for another four years with the current backups as well. I like this group a lot.


Well said. I'm with you; I like Spears a lot.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,078
Messages
14,510,909
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top