OP also asked for thoughts on scheme. This is a previous post, so teams may have mixed up or down a spot or two, but to basic idea remains true.
Lots of talk about man vs zone, and it’s a fair enough topic to discuss. We needed more man coverage than we had early, this is true.
I personally think that maybe Eberflus base defensive schemes just aren’t very good and to make it worse, our talent is below average, at best.
All teams run more zone than man, significantly more.
- It seems that somewhere around 25% man coverage is average.
- Only a couple of teams run man at around 40%
We, as fans, saw our defense suck so bad that we all clamored to switch to man coverage, but honestly, that’s just because we knew Eberflus ran zone and we knew our defense sucked. Seemed logical to change something basic.
What does the league do?
- Guys like Dennis Allen, Kelvin Shepherd, and Jim Schwartz are up toward that 40% man coverage mark.
- They run a lot of cover-1 which is man coverage with a safety deep. They have a good scheme and good players.
- The Browns (Schwartz) lead the league in passing defense using a ton of man
- The Bills are second and Bobby Babich runs lots of zone. They plan man at around 20% or so.
- The Texans, whose defense dominated the Bills recently, is the overall best in the league and their DC, Matt Burke, runs a really high percentage of zone. The thing is, their pass rush was ferocious.
- They got 8 sacks and forced three turnovers.
- They are third in the league in sacks, although no one is close to Denver, which runs a cover-2 zone variation.
The real bottom line is that you can have a good defense either way.
So, what do you need to have a good pass defense?
- More than anything you need great talent
- You need DBs who can play zone and play it well. Thats what they’ll be doing most of the time.
- If you want to use a lot of man, you need DBs who are good at both.
- You need a scheme and players to generate terrific pressure on the QB (duh)
- You need a coach who is great at game planning and teaching his scheme, whatever that may be. “Man” is not a complete defensive philosophy.