Defense saved our butts...

Messages
36
Reaction score
1
Hey,

If it was not for the brilliant palycalling of Wade in regards to our Defence, we would have lost the game.

My thoughts regarding the game:

1. Garett needs to go... His offensive schemes per game are horrible.
This is what happens when the OC gets hired before the HC. (Jerry J. stupidity)

2. I don't think that Wade likes Garett or vice versa. They should let Garett go and let Wade pick the OC..

3. If Romo was hurt, why did we let him continue and almost jeopardize the game... Here Wade should of put him on the Bench and let Kitna continue.

4. Thanks to Suisham for letting us win.

Summary: All in all, Wade is doing a great job with the Defence.. He needs to step in and take control of the Offence..

If we play like we did in our future games I only see us winning 2 more games until the end of the season: Oakland and Washington...

Thanks,
 
MontrealCowboyFan4ever;3096111 said:
Hey,

If it was not for the brilliant palycalling of Wade in regards to our Defence, we would have lost the game.

My thoughts regarding the game:

1. Garett needs to go... His offensive schemes per game are horrible.
This is what happens when the OC gets hired before the HC. (Jerry J. stupidity)

2. I don't think that Wade likes Garett or vice versa. They should let Garett go and let Wade pick the OC..

3. If Romo was hurt, why did we let him continue and almost jeopardize the game... Here Wade should of put him on the Bench and let Kitna continue.

4. Thanks to Suisham for letting us win.

Summary: All in all, Wade is doing a great job with the Defence.. He needs to step in and take control of the Offence..

If we play like we did in our future games I only see us winning 2 more games until the end of the season: Oakland and Washington...

Thanks,

I agree with almost everything there, except the bold. If John Kitna is in the game we lose. It's that simple. Romo pulled a Romo and made something out of nothing. That "something" won the game. Kitna takes a sack there 99 times out of 100.

Romo was downright awful yesterday, no doubt. That's two weeks in a row for him (and the rest of the passing game). It needs to get corrected pronto or this team is in trouble but it doesn't change the fact that, even on Romo's worst day, he's a better option than Kitna.
 
MontrealCowboyFan4ever;3096111 said:
Hey,

If it was not for the brilliant palycalling of Wade in regards to our Defence, we would have lost the game.

My thoughts regarding the game:

1. Garett needs to go... His offensive schemes per game are horrible.
This is what happens when the OC gets hired before the HC. (Jerry J. stupidity)

2. I don't think that Wade likes Garett or vice versa. They should let Garett go and let Wade pick the OC..

3. If Romo was hurt, why did we let him continue and almost jeopardize the game... Here Wade should of put him on the Bench and let Kitna continue.

4. Thanks to Suisham for letting us win.

Summary: All in all, Wade is doing a great job with the Defence.. He needs to step in and take control of the Offence..

If we play like we did in our future games I only see us winning 2 more games until the end of the season: Oakland and Washington...

Thanks,

So your summation is that Garrett stinks, the offense stinks and Kitna should have come?

Had kitna played yesterday we would have been beaten by double digits.

Suisham didnt let anyone win, this failed logic is really annoying.

We fumbled on the 12, we missed a field goal. We forced them to kick longer field goals by playing terrific defense.

It came down to one drive for each team in the final 7 minutes of the game. We played well on offense, defense and buehler had a good kick and we covered it well and they were backed up. Thats it.

Last year we beat them 14-10 in the same exact manner and everyone was ecstatic. Now today everyone is throwing the team under the bus.

Unreal expectations creates unattainable goals which leads to ridiculous critique.
 
theebs;3096158 said:
So your summation is that Garrett stinks, the offense stinks and Kitna should have come?

Had kitna played yesterday we would have been beaten by double digits.

Suisham didnt let anyone win, this failed logic is really annoying.

We fumbled on the 12, we missed a field goal. We forced them to kick longer field goals by playing terrific defense.

It came down to one drive for each team in the final 7 minutes of the game. We played well on offense, defense and buehler had a good kick and we covered it well and they were backed up. Thats it.

Last year we beat them 14-10 in the same exact manner and everyone was ecstatic. Now today everyone is throwing the team under the bus.

Unreal expectations creates unattainable goals which leads to ridiculous critique.

theebs, we should win every game by 30 points. Come on. Get with the program.
 
Defense is playing very well, however I would like to see a little more three and outs.
 
1. Garett needs to go... His offensive schemes per game are horrible.
This is what happens when the OC gets hired before the HC. (Jerry J. stupidity)

Read Bob's blog. He says lack of execution, Garrett had the Skins guessing alot particularly end of game.
 
Oh_Canada;3096176 said:
Defense is playing very well, however I would like to see a little more three and outs.

I did think we had some poor tackles out there that allowed the skins to change the field position on us a few times. All in all though I thought the defense played hard all day long.
 
Back
Top