Defensive adjustments

Hawkeye19

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
25,920
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss
 
We have the personnel for it. LVE, Neal, Cox, Parsons. Big fatty Bohana in the middle.
 
..wouldn't worry to much. Glad it wasn't someone in the middle. We can manage outside with fast LB's.
 
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

Its over buddy. But the last thing we should do is starting switching everything around. Backups gotta play. Even though they suck. DE was one of our thinest positions on the team.

Our only hope is that Goldston is somehow some sleeping stud that comes out and fills in for Gregory. I think that was his position anyway.
 
I expect changes, I wouldn't be surprised if Dallas shows some 3-4 looks.
 
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss
What’s new?
 
Its over buddy. But the last thing we should do is starting switching everything around. Backups gotta play. Even though they suck. DE was one of our thinest positions on the team.

Our only hope is that Goldston is somehow some sleeping stud that comes out and fills in for Gregory. I think that was his position anyway.

They won't find anyone to replace the Edge but they could bring in guys that might help the horrid middle of the defensive line. They could call a guy like Geno Atkins, see if he can still play. Plug up the middle. Attack it all from a different way.... I would at least try. Nothing to lose at this point...
 
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss


No switch up, just plug in Anae & Armstrong.
 
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

I kinda like this idea. Clustercuss or not, lol.
 
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss
Makes total sense as they have the depth at the LB position at this time.
 
You run Quinn’s defense
We hired him to run the D so you tell him, here’s the players you have
Make it work
You don’t go all change everything because we lost a player
Let him do his thing with what he has and the way he wants to do it
 
It would make sense to play more 3-4, considering our weaknesses in this upcoming game. Gregory will be back week after, so we can go back to 4-3 then.

So we won't do that, of course.
 
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

I like your style brother.
 
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss
I think we will see that type of alignment on the D for a good part of the game.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,678
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top